Try holding the sample against a piece of white paper, in general ligthing. Do this consistently on all future tests for consistency in readings.
For the ammonia test, if it indicates .25 or greater, do a water change. What is the ammonia reading on your tap water?
Should you hold the tube sideways flat against the white card, flat and away from the card or take the lid off the top and look down the tube against the card/away from the card? You will notice that there is a huge difference in the readings. I think what the original poster was really asking is what way actually gives the BEST and most ACCURATE reading according to the color cards enclosed in the kit. You can read it anyway you like to get consistent readings, but they may be the wrong readings, (at least not the most ACCURATE).
Even in saying that...........how do we REALLY know that the tests are calibrated properly? A good example is ammonia. At only .25 or any reading at all is not too good......so I guess what I am saying is that the test kits give good guidelines but there are sooooo many variables.
I am a press operator/designer with color theory as a background and I have always shaken my head a bit at the liquid testing kits. Albeit they are much better than the paper test strips.
Sorry about the "venting" but what I would really like to see is a test kit for the advanced that tells you exactly what type of lighting, (D50, 60, etc.), what spectrum the lighting was, the density value of the cards (stock substrate as well as the densities of the colors), when "they" calibrated or made the kits.
The other problem, as mentioned was how close the color is for each step, it would be nice to have a greater difference but I don't think that is possible.
Ex. Green of any shade = 0ppm, Red of any shade = .25ppm
This is pretty much impossible but it would sure help the beginners.
anyways, sorry to hi-jack this post but the original poster brought up an excellent topic.........I think!
Cheers.