Your opinion on non-human primates (i.e. Bigfoot) in North America?
- Thread starter Piranha86
- Start date
I am primate and proud of it. Our primateness is hard to deny. Genetically, anotomically and otherwise. Nothing wrong with being linked to tarsiers and old world monkeys.
As for bigfoot's existence. He's as real as the Loch ness monster.
As for bigfoot's existence. He's as real as the Loch ness monster.
come on lbf you have to have some opinion on bigfoot. what is ur gut feeling even?
livebearerfreak
you are hypnotized! LOL
I still stand by my opinion..... humans are not even near being primates..... we still have not found the missing link... unless you can prove me otherwise. I stay by my opinion.. if you want my opinion pm me... also has nothing to do with religion....
Sent from my SPH-D600 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Sent from my SPH-D600 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
There are always unknowns. The only known in this universe is that there are unknowns. - Travis R. Palmer
And once again, I lose faith in humanity...
Being a Primate does not mean we are descended from monkeys (well, technically we ARE, but thats moot). It merely means that we have charactaristics that label us as a species similar to a number of other creatures, so we (as humans) chose to categorize ourselves with them despite being an amazing 2% different from our nearest existing (and known) relative in the animal kingdom (which we are part of btw). It doesn't mean we have to be directly descended from them, not by any stretch of the imagination.
Here's the closest thing we ever had to a Bigfoot. And early man probably encountered it too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus
OMG, it's bigfoot! lol, thats exactly what I imagine bigfoot would look like if it's real 
So... who wants to ask about Nessie?
So... who wants to ask about Nessie?
Do you accept mice, rats, squirrels, chipmunks, porcupines and beavers as examples of rodents? If so, do you know the precise evolutionary history including the common ancestor and where/when/how each speciation occurred?
My guess is your second answer would be "no."
Also there are many Intermediate forms linking past ancestors (monkeys) to humans, but everytime one is found it creates 2more gaps because generally there is a intermediate form between what we already knew and the new one, which by no way means it doesnt exist but we havnt found it yet. by asking for one "missing link" you truley do not understand evolution at any level... Which would make it impossible for you to think about human evolution at all so you are being both ignorant (uninformed) and arrogant at the same time since you say no one can convince you otherwise
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
