Let me see if a can get a run down on this.I don't understand what doesn't compute Mav? You also need to help me understand the many variables. Of course they wanted to protect JB's role, he's scum.
We gave them the invest name before nightfall, if he's innocent all they had to do was hit him. We (the town) still gain nothing.
Looks to me like Rich hit two scum in a row.
Can you pull the quote where he says he wants to believe Zaffy? I thought that was Raz, you even called him on it.
You guys are right it was Razz wanting to believe Zaffy, sorry UN.would you mind pulling out when i said that?
:iagree:
I think it's fair to say that options 3&4 can be marked out because they are no longer valid because of last nights events.Let me see if a can get a run down on this.
Option 1: Rich says he will invest JB. JB is going to turn up scum so mafia hits Rich killing the Det and covering up JB's role.
Option 2: Rich says he will invest JB. JB is going to turn up innocent so mafia hits Rich killing Det and we think they are protecting JB.
Option 3: Rich says he will invest JB. JB is going to turn up innocent so mafia hits JB so we are left with 2 Det.
Option 4: Rich says he will invest JB. Rich lies and he invests someone else. Mafia hits JB now we have 2 valid invests to use when we figure out which of the 2 det is real.
He attacked Zaffy.
Ok, trust me UN, when I'm viewing this thread, I'm not gonna be 'quieting down'.
All I'm saying is that I have a very strong feeling that Haydn is scum. I do however suspect salt, but not as much as Haydn.
First of all everyone, I apologize for anything rude I said last night.
I love stitch-scars!
I think he needed one after he tried for you.
I'm going to go grumble things to my guinea pig.
Have I not stated that I have a very strong feeling that Haydn is scum?
I have already stated that I have a very strong feeling that Haydn is scum. Salt and JM are also on my list.
Was this posted on the wrong den?
I've got better evidence than you think...
It's not. But just to clarify my vote stays on Haydn and was never actually on Zaffy.
I agree I was just putting all of the options that were valid when the mafia had to decide who to hit.I think it's fair to say that options 3&4 can be marked out because they are no longer valid because of last nights events.
Listen, I'm perfectly willing to admit my theory may not be fool proof, but I'd like to get more opinions. Your options 2, and 4 are a boatload of crap, but options 1, and 3 are legit choices.I agree I was just putting all of the options that were valid when the mafia had to decide who to hit.
Listen, I'm perfectly willing to admit my theory may not be fool proof, but I'd like to get more opinions. Your options 2, and 4 are a boatload of crap, but options 1, and 3 are legit choices.
You have to consider that by hitting Rich they were giving up Zaffy.
forgot to adress your second point. We were going to figure out the truth on Zaffy anyways they could not have protected him.Listen, I'm perfectly willing to admit my theory may not be fool proof, but I'd like to get more opinions. Your options 2, and 4 are a boatload of crap, but options 1, and 3 are legit choices.
You have to consider that by hitting Rich they were giving up Zaffy.
Maybe I'm reading #2 wrong, but as I read it, it's:bs:.4 is out there but something I might do in rich's situation, however, 2 is perfectly reasonable.