wow, arn't you likely to end up with loads of people replying to posts saying stuff like "well my angels never ate my neons" or "I have had plenty of success keeping Oscars and crocodiles" (well...maybe not crocodiles lol)
Echoing other concers, as a know-nothing I think there's a danger in acting primarily on another person's personal experience. Species profiles from a respected source (web, literature, experienced fishkeepers) are great - but there is a reason why they sometimes seem a little qualified, general, or maybe bland (lacking that personal touch). That's because they are profiles, drawn on what is considered to be the most widely observed traits, characteristics, needs etc. which is the responsible way, IMO, to present information on a species.
Information in this format is also pretty widely available IME
So it seems to me that profiles based on personal experience primarily will just be nice fishy stories or tank histories (hey, I'm all in favour of those ) but they're pretty anecdotal. Profiles drawn up by experts which are intended to be comprehensive and as accurate as possible kind of inherently are as described above. And how do you vet the quality of information on a thread like this ?
More helpful for newbies (read me) to read lots and ask specific questions, evaluating their source continually, and for experts to share their knowledge and experience in response. I've never not had a question answered here where I gave correct information
...mind you've I've only been around a wet-weekend...I presume some of you tireless volunteers to the cause of fish welfare eventually run out of patience...speaking of which I'm thinking of putting a crocodile in with my Oscar...I've heard crocodiles are brackish...nevermind...
Echoing other concers, as a know-nothing I think there's a danger in acting primarily on another person's personal experience. Species profiles from a respected source (web, literature, experienced fishkeepers) are great - but there is a reason why they sometimes seem a little qualified, general, or maybe bland (lacking that personal touch). That's because they are profiles, drawn on what is considered to be the most widely observed traits, characteristics, needs etc. which is the responsible way, IMO, to present information on a species.
Information in this format is also pretty widely available IME
So it seems to me that profiles based on personal experience primarily will just be nice fishy stories or tank histories (hey, I'm all in favour of those ) but they're pretty anecdotal. Profiles drawn up by experts which are intended to be comprehensive and as accurate as possible kind of inherently are as described above. And how do you vet the quality of information on a thread like this ?
More helpful for newbies (read me) to read lots and ask specific questions, evaluating their source continually, and for experts to share their knowledge and experience in response. I've never not had a question answered here where I gave correct information
...mind you've I've only been around a wet-weekend...I presume some of you tireless volunteers to the cause of fish welfare eventually run out of patience...speaking of which I'm thinking of putting a crocodile in with my Oscar...I've heard crocodiles are brackish...nevermind...
Last edited: