Mafia 9: The Bloody Coup

jpappy789 said:
I still don't think that he would do that on purpose. There is only one newb and a good chance that they have a role of some sort...
Click to expand...

I'm still gonna assume the person who has the role of president has some wits about him or her and is not in danger of being lynched. I think if it came to that the bodyguard would try to steer us CC's in a safer direction. I still think it's important that we vote. However I will consider a no-vote if enough ppl that are trustworthy promote that route.
 
sploke said:
Ice's feelings shouldn't have anything to do with it - the assignments are supposed to be totally random, so feelings about "what he would give us" shouldn't really be a basis for any kind of voting system. I think this has been covered in about every game I've seen.
Click to expand...

actually, no.... they haven't "all" been random. This one maybe but "all" the others, nah... I know at least 1 was not.
 
plantling said:
I'm still gonna assume the person who has the role of president has some wits about him or her and is not in danger of being lynched. I think if it came to that the bodyguard would try to steer us CC's in a safer direction. I still think it's important that we vote. However I will consider a no-vote if enough ppl that are trustworthy promote that route.
Click to expand...

there's no way to know or tell who the president is or how much "wit" they have since it is a random picker, unless ice was not happy with who got the role the first time, for all we know emma could be the president.
 
I guess I'm just an agreeable person. :)

It's early and I'm taking everyone's thoughts into consideration. I have put my own opinions in their too. I just agreed with KOTDs point about jo being all fussy when nobody voted for him. He made a good point IMO.
 
I brought up the idea for a vote for nobody as something to discuss.

I have always been one against it. I am willing to have an open mind and discuss it. I see the reasons not to.

This games dynamics are very different.

A lynching of the president means the game is over. What we will learn is that the game is over.

I am unsure how valuable a list on day one is, or who we can even make a list. It seems the people who are on the hot seat are those that post.

Right now, everyone is on my list as suspects.

I also would like more input on why or why not to vote for nobody from some of the other players. I really thought Ogre would think it was a good idea, but maybe when he wanted to do it in the past when he was mafia.

I like the 50% chance of hitting rebels.

I do not like the 5% chance of ending the game with a hit on the president.

I am not even sayinh I am for it, I want to talk about it.

At this stage of the game, talking is the only way to learn.
 
Lady G said:
Hmmmm do you not find it odd that not in one of those post from Jp did he ever say why, or fight back in ANY way. AND he agrees seems VERY submissive to me
Click to expand...

out of all the posts i quoted, only 2 are relevent to the game, and in one he agrees with someone, in the other he says he thinks its interesting that ogre names two people..in response to that post I would have asked why, but im not him.

IMO thats not in any way suspicious to me..why is agreeing with someone suspicious? if you understand a point someone is making why question it?

in his lynch post, jo mentioned pappy was agreeing with everyone when in fact he agreed with one person, this was the point i was trying to make.
 
Continuing...

I asked Ogre why he mentioned jl and mad...he explained and I backed off. There is a chance that at least one of the two are rebels. I still think it was a little suspicious of ogre but then again everybody is acting weird...

With my "agreeing" with jo, I saw his point and understood why he was a little ticked off at being put on everyones list merely for voting early. What I don't agree with is that he is being very pushy about it and also voted for KOTD kinda out of the blue...
 
I wasn't trying to twist her words...she probably thought I was talking about Sov and Mad (since Mad made a comment about I probably shouldn't have left my cow out in the pasture)that is what I was talking about....
KingOfTheDeep said:
seems to me that mee-mee is trying to twist lady's words here to take some heat off of herself..hmmm

only suspect these two right now..

mee-mee
joander
Click to expand...

Lady G said:
I think she/he (sorry not sure), was talking about when they go to other post in the site, at least that is the way I took it. Or maybe thought you have to do it each time you log in..if that is the case you don't have to just go and put yourself invisible and hit apply you will stay that way until you switch back.


Oh MM, no one mentioned it was in the chat room the day before...you know me I have to point everything out. Well I know we (CC's) can't post outside the game but rebels can that was my point to you.

Yes, I know....and Niko ate my cow....darn him...and flappy liked it to and so did cavey...I will get them next time I am in chat....


Ok....when did I "jump" on anyone, I haven't voted anyone, or mentioned a list as of yet. The only thing I did was make a few observations...are you getting jumppy here:lipssealedsmilie:
Click to expand...
 
And I do believe this also...1 major player could have been given the major important role...we have all experienced players here, and some of us have played all the games....
Dangerdoll said:
actually, no.... they haven't "all" been random. This one maybe but "all" the others, nah... I know at least 1 was not.
Click to expand...


If we did a no vote tomorrow night, then it would leave the Rebels a chance to take out 2 of us. One for CIA and 1 for FBI...and the Doctor can not protect against lynchings...only hits....
The Doctor’ can protect hits only not lynchings. If the Concerned Citizens lynch the president game over.


johnlarson66 said:
I brought up the idea for a vote for nobody as something to discuss.

I have always been one against it. I am willing to have an open mind and discuss it. I see the reasons not to.

This games dynamics are very different.

A lynching of the president means the game is over. What we will learn is that the game is over.

I am unsure how valuable a list on day one is, or who we can even make a list. It seems the people who are on the hot seat are those that post.

Right now, everyone is on my list as suspects.

I also would like more input on why or why not to vote for nobody from some of the other players. I really thought Ogre would think it was a good idea, but maybe when he wanted to do it in the past when he was mafia.

I like the 50% chance of hitting rebels.

I do not like the 5% chance of ending the game with a hit on the president.

I am not even sayinh I am for it, I want to talk about it.

At this stage of the game, talking is the only way to learn.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom