If I had to list, I would say Charlie, Grins or you.
I have already stated reasons for both Charlie and Grins, and you becuase I have begun to notice a difference in your issues which you call importance. I feel usually, your findings are much more than what you have now and seem to support them with as much passion. I don't like what I see by your posts.
I actually like the 3 up there now.
HNs try to implicate me let me go back and find all these inconsistencies.
Jpap was the vote that put Niko over the top
Beth has been all over the place, voting for herself even after making a list of suspects. Posts that were hardly comprehendable to posts that are very well written.
Charlie is questionable for his late switch
You are a better suspect then Grins. The copy and paste is enough proof to me that you're communicating. Also the post in which you quoted Mad but answered HN was another of your mistakes. Did you mean to attack Mad or HN in that post? If HN then you should be glad to vote him. If Mad then why was HN on your mind? Was it because you were communicating with HN?