or are they...maybe my "new" eyes are seeing something else herehmmm...more incoherent ramblings....
or are they...maybe my "new" eyes are seeing something else herehmmm...more incoherent ramblings....
Well, it certainly has been an interesting day....not too many signs on who the snitches are at this point but definately some interesting behaviors. Chill & Judge are either crazier than I am or they know somethin that I don't. Walking around singing and drinking like nothin is happening. Weird.
Besides they didn't offer any tequila to me! What does a girl have to do around this place to get a drink? Never mind- not sure I want to know.....![]()
Tree Hugger: along with rb, you have an interesting way of interpreting my posts. I never said I trusted anybody, just that rb is the only one (thus far) to give me a REASON not to trust him.
After a long evening at work... release, jbradt is in an introspective mood. It seems that the interactions among these people come in a few definite flavors... :rofl:, :duh:, :bs:, :argue:, and :screwy:. Most of it seems pretty inane. Like the ramble of people honestly trying to make the best of being stuck here.
But there were snitches afoot, and until they were found, somebody was gonna get shanked, and everybody knew it. Most of the other inmates seem pretty calm, but that rb... he was looking for something. Maybe it was a red herring, maybe elvis and bigfoot would bring him one with the smokes. Anything is theoretically possible. He's aweful jumpy though to come out and call out a guy for being a snitch in the first day. That might mean he has something to hide. And somebody has to go, so I vote to shank rbishop.
Nothing personal, rb. I enjoyed our little banter but you were the only one to give me even a small reason not to trust you.
With that particular decision off his mind, he lays down on his cot (back firmly against the wall), and waits to see if he wakes up.opcorn:
Jeez Noodles we were wandering around with an open invitation we would have been happy to have you join. I'll be sure to put you on the guest list next time.
Tree Hugger: along with rb, you have an interesting way of interpreting my posts. I never said I trusted anybody, just that rb is the only one (thus far) to give me a REASON not to trust him.
Jpap: Are you really saying that I'm suspect because I said it was too early to know anything? I appreciate the credit, but it seems you may have been into the tequilla too.
Well darn, here I thought I was doing my duty before I left yesterday. I should probably go back an read, I thought last night or this morning would be nightfall because of the weird time zone for me, so since I knew I wouldn't get back in time, I thought I'd leave a vote that would count. Silly me. I should probably fix that.
I vote to shank Lady G.[/g]
I hope that's the right terminology, (I still can't see this monitor and reading's a real pain.)
If not, I'm sure someone will come along in a helpful, or 8 hours later (where was everyone else when I was posting eh?), and tell me I'm wrong. *lol*
The reasons still stand, it's exactly as I said it - and wow the defensiveness poured forth a little bit. If one says that a mafia whatever-you-call-them-in-this-game would do their best to look lily white, while starting trains, I think we saw that.
It's more typical for them to jump on someone else for their 'aggressive vote' then for them to actually be the aggressor - hence Dirtydawg, he shouldn't have picked on the littler/new guys, a perfect opportunity for an actual Mafia person to look like they're innocent by accusing him. When I think more than that, getting on the case of a newer player for no reason is such a bad move, a real mafia person (unless they really don't want to last long in the game), would never go there, it's too risky. But someone else might easily jump on them for looking guilty. It's possible Lady G is innocent, like I said, it's only night 1, but I know my playing pattern, and I know that on the weekends, I have to be fast, short and sweet, because I may never get back to the game, so I don't have a lot of time to dither around and drink and sing songs, at least not unil the weekday rolls around.
It's not like I think any of you should also vote her out, this is a great game, with lots of interesting people, and each person's Night 1 introductions and style will be different - it'll be tricky as always to get a read. I'm not holding Lady G's and our first game together, but I feel that her strategy might be a repeat, only in the opposite, someone trying to look too innocent could be guilty. That's all. IT's night 1 folks. All I know is in the last game I played, before HN hoodwinked his own partner, I had been right almost every time about each person, so hopefully my "gut" will continue to work. Or vote me out, whatever, but I know my status and I know that if a lynch comes, you'll all be nowhere when it comes to finding the snitches. I'm not really concerned though, after all it is Night 1, and somebody's gotta go, and it's very rarely someone who's guilty.
noone accused you of anything...yetTree Hugger: along with rb, you have an interesting way of interpreting my posts. I never said I trusted anybody, just that rb is the only one (thus far) to give me a REASON not to trust him.
Jpap: Are you really saying that I'm suspect because I said it was too early to know anything? I appreciate the credit, but it seems you may have been into the tequilla too.