Mafia #43 Bio Badlands #2

[Madcrawdad]

Nope, no real input. Just a few vauge lines aimed at 3L.

I vote to genetically test Ctenopoma.

Even after thowing out suspicion towards 3L, Cten waited until 3L was doomed before voting for 3L.

I also think the choice of DD needs to be looked into. She would have been a good person for the evils to have around. The fact that they did not hit me or ZS has me concerned.

There was a little dialog between noodles and DD that I am going to attempt to find. It seemed L3 thought they were a team.

If I was going to vote for anyone else, it would be either noodles or ZS. Noodles because of the DD connection and ZS for still being alive. For now I am pretty much sold on Cten and doubt if I will change, but things can change pretty fast here.

JL, I agree that Ctenopoma is one who needs their feet really put to the fire on Day 2 (along with BKW and Rosita), but I'm unclear on the rest of your post.

I think you're implying that Z might be scum because he wasn't hit last night, right? But at the same time you say you're also concerned that YOU weren't hit last night. Why?

Also, you refer to a DD/noodles team (as pointed out by 3L), which causes you to suspect Noodles. DD was innocent, so I don't see being linked to her as a bad thing. I think that Dawg has pointed out some interesting things that makes Noodles a suspect, but suspecting her because 3L thought she and DD were teammates seems odd... How did you come to that?

 

[Lady G]

That's only because you like making up afterwards. :naughty:

Is 3 or 4 people out of 13 suspects several or a few? Either way it was more than one so I was suspicious. It's night 1 so I didn't have much to go on. I didn't wan't to vote 3L just for the annoyance factor because we have played with annoying people before.

Now some suspicions have come to light since last night. Noodles and Z are standing out to me because they both seemed like they were trying to be perceived as being close with DD. Then DD gets knocked off by the Evils and they are in the clear. Now perhaps they are distancing with their more recent posts although the early vote on Noodles is a risky move if they are in cahoots. Z seems a little more suspect to me because of this post...



His "meh" comment bothered me at first but I see some others felt it wasn't such a bad thing to lose 3L even though he was a townie. Then I notice he's discounting 3L's comments because DD was in fact innocent (totally understandable due to 3L's posting style). Then it made me wonder if Z is trying to cover for Noodles who was also mentioned by 3L. For now I vote to genetically test Z.

I am on the fence with these two so if my vote is needed I could also be persuaded to change to Noodles at this point.

I don't want to turn this into a huge back and forth kinda thing, but I didn't say you were suspect, I just had fun with ya for a bit. As far as DD, never really said she was either...just stated that her and Z seemed to be picking on the newb. Z on the other hand did stand out to me and I stated that, he still does, and I have to agree with you and others about Noodles. Having said that I only actually said one person was suspect at the time and it was a weak suspect at that..but still the most I had to go on.

Judge...how am I playing soooo differently? I have always posted quite a bit and always had fun with peeps. Yes there were a few games in a row I really didn't get to participate as much so my posting was low.

 

[noodles62]

Well now I feel better about my suspicions of you. I hate to say it but I am going to have to follow Z's lead because I think he's right.

I retract my vote for Z and I vote to genetically test Noodles

hhmmm...I don't see how my post would prove any suspicions but I guess that is as good excuse as any to get rid of another townie....with my suspicions of Z and his strange vote reasons and now you seeming to team up with him...something smells fishy in ACville. We still have time so I will wait ot vote but you and Z are at the top of my list....

 

[johnlarson66]

JL, I agree that Ctenopoma is one who needs their feet really put to the fire on Day 2 (along with BKW and Rosita), but I'm unclear on the rest of your post.

I think you're implying that Z might be scum because he wasn't hit last night, right? But at the same time you say you're also concerned that YOU weren't hit last night. Why?

Also, you refer to a DD/noodles team (as pointed out by 3L), which causes you to suspect Noodles. DD was innocent, so I don't see being linked to her as a bad thing. I think that Dawg has pointed out some interesting things that makes Noodles a suspect, but suspecting her because 3L thought she and DD were teammates seems odd... How did you come to that?

I am concerned that I was not hit, because it has seemed in the past few games I played in, when I was innocent, I was hit early. I would think the evils would want me gone, but maybe they want me around.

I think that if noodles is evil, then it would make sense for the evils to hit DD. Even though the noodles/DD team was put out there by 3L, it was still out there. Now that DD was proven innocent, noodles link to DD makes it appear that noodles is innocent. Innocent by association. Now the real question is, besides 3L, had anyone seen a real link between DD and noodles. I saw where DD was questoning noodles on their game play being different. It is hard to put any wieght in what 3L was saying, but the fact is that he was innocent and was a newb. I can honestly say, I would have voted for him today, unless he would have voted for an evil that was lynched. Beyond that, he was gone. I didn't think 3L was very helpful to the town and would have had no problem testing him.

As far as BKW and Rosita, I am unsure of the rule, but appearently rb has let them slide. I think they should be looked into, but I also think that if they were evil, they would have made sure they got their votes in. It seems to me that most UD's are innocents. There is something about being evil that makes someone be more into the game. Maybe rb let them stay to avoid losing 4 innocents in the first day. That is a huge assumption. Trying to figure out why rb does what he does is not something I am prepared to do.

 

[dirtydawg10]

hhmmm...I don't see how my post would prove any suspicions but I guess that is as good excuse as any to get rid of another townie....with my suspicions of Z and his strange vote reasons and now you seeming to team up with him...something smells fishy in ACville. We still have time so I will wait ot vote but you and Z are at the top of my list....

It makes me more suspicious because you first say you don't know who your suspects are. Then you say Z and LG are suspicious. To me it seems like you are bringing up names to see if anyone will jump on but not commiting to anyone in particular. That's why I changed my vote to you.

 

[noodles62]

It makes me more suspicious because you first say you don't know who your suspects are. Then you say Z and LG are suspicious. To me it seems like you are bringing up names to see if anyone will jump on but not commiting to anyone in particular. That's why I changed my vote to you.

OMG! I think and type at the same time, sooooo first I said I dont know, then as I thought about it a few things did surface. I still think that is a pretty lame reason to side up with Z, whom you orignally had your vote on. Perhaps the intial vote on Z was a ploy to throw the townies off, and you two truly are a team.....:huh:

 

[Lady G]

OMG! I think and type at the same time, sooooo first I said I dont know, then as I thought about it a few things did surface. I still think that is a pretty lame reason to side up with Z, whom you orignally had your vote on. Perhaps the intial vote on Z was a ploy to throw the townies off, and you two truly are a team.....:huh:

Noodles, just a question here...where did Dawg "side up" with Z? Because he voted you?? I realize when someone throws their vote on you, it makes you more suspicious of them but, is that the only reason you are wondering about him...because of his vote?

 

[noodles62]

Noodles, just a question here...where did Dawg "side up" with Z? Because he voted you?? I realize when someone throws their vote on you, it makes you more suspicious of them but, is that the only reason you are wondering about him...because of his vote?

It just seems strange that first he thinks Z is evil and casts his vote, then he turns around and agrees w/ Z, where Z had a really lame reason for voting me in the first place. Z's first night vote reason was pretty lame too.

 

[ZSandmann]

Your reasoning for your votes this game seems a bit odd.....
Kinda sends up a few flags. :irked:

It's early on Day 2, my Day 1 vote was a joke but towards the end I was really believing we had one. We will see how day 2 goes.

 

[ZSandmann]

Is 3 or 4 people out of 13 suspects several or a few? Either way it was more than one so I was suspicious. It's night 1 so I didn't have much to go on. I didn't wan't to vote 3L just for the annoyance factor because we have played with annoying people before.

Now some suspicions have come to light since last night. Noodles and Z are standing out to me because they both seemed like they were trying to be perceived as being close with DD. Then DD gets knocked off by the Evils and they are in the clear. Now perhaps they are distancing with their more recent posts although the early vote on Noodles is a risky move if they are in cahoots. Z seems a little more suspect to me because of this post...



His "meh" comment bothered me at first but I see some others felt it wasn't such a bad thing to lose 3L even though he was a townie. Then I notice he's discounting 3L's comments because DD was in fact innocent (totally understandable due to 3L's posting style). Then it made me wonder if Z is trying to cover for Noodles who was also mentioned by 3L. For now I vote to genetically test Z.

I am on the fence with these two so if my vote is needed I could also be persuaded to change to Noodles at this point.

I placed a vote on noodles and we are now in cahoots? That doesn't make any since Dawg. And I barely spoke to DD so I don't see how we were close. Weird reasoning is weird.