I think the people trying to find out who were who in other mafia games,probably are evil elfs,idk just my own opinion.
Really? Are you sure about that?
I'm going to keep away from voting newbs on night one because I have no way of reading them since I haven't seen their play before. All bets are off on night 2 though.
I agree I have followed this for a while now because too often we lynch an innocent newb night 1. Is it really worth putting up one for the lynch just because one of the three
might be evil?
I have DD leaning more evil the more I think about V2K and then DD posts, the more I want to lynch DD. I will say if V2K comes up evil, I will vote DD and if DD comes up evil I will cote V2K.
If I change, I most likely will change from jpap to DD. jpap did start something about past roles and then claims it had no merit. Odd thing to start, seems to me he was trying to get others on some sort of witch hunt and was going to then step away.
But you started to jump on when I first asked. I have no doubt in my mind that if I
didn't look into it further and noodles or someone else came back saying that she was mafia in a certain game that you would have jumped right onto me.
Wow a whole lot said in the last few hours but no real content. I would have to say that right now most of the mafia is laying low letting the town turn round and round on itself.
JL your digging hard to find something and some pays off and some is just junk ends.
Noodles your content so far has not had much more than chit chat and self defense.
DD your deflecting a lot of stuff and trying to get people to look the other way. When I played agains you and you were evil you played better than that so I believe that your leaning innocent.
As for the noobs they are playing like noobs and showing more than they should. My biggest concern right now is Eddie. So with that said IDK if there is a clear choice right now so I'm staying were I am.
A pretty blanket statement right there. Why state something that appears so obvious?
If you read my past games you will note the confusion follows me...sad but true. Like I said I must have been blond in a previous life. I post my thoughts and then after I think about it more - I come back and be honest. figure its best cause somebody will call it out anyway. maybe this is not good playing strategy but I guess I am doof.
Woah, did you really just say that? Do you really lie that often???
A detailed list like that on day one? You have to be joking. The sad part about your list is that you are being serious. It is day one.
Your reasons and ranks serve no purpose. You have barely even particapated and then break out this scaled list. A day one scaled list. Based on what? The only purpose I see for this list is to create confusion. It is non-helpful because it is not based on anything besides day one posts. Have you even voted? The people that hold on to their vote until late into the day are the ones that harm the town the most. Place a vote. It is okay to change it. All those thoughts and no vote?
I would like to see more interaction from Brandy and not some sort of hit and run scaled list. The closer nightfall comes with a shortage of vote, the more everyones votes are spread out. I hope others place votes soon.
Brandy always puts out lists and while I don't agree with a lot she says I think posting that a list on day one is stupid is actually quite stupid. If she put it in paragraph form would you have made such a big deal out of it? No, you would have just tried to counter her arguments. Instead you focused on the fact that it was a list...makes no sense to me.
I hate first day voting. Not much to go on. I'm not sure how much I can be on today so will go ahead and put in a vote.
I vote to lynch 3L
It is very odd that he's posted in at least two other threads since the game began and not even a peep in this one. It makes me wonder if he's the lone evil elf and doensn't know how to play the role. He may UD in which case I will change my vote later.
This is only the 2nd time I've played w/Noodles and the first she was voted out early as an evil so I can't say I know how she plays but it seems she's fidgety though she has tried to explain her errors.
John seemed fidgety in the beginning also but I have played w/him b4 when he was innocent and going after pple or "kicking weasles". He can be quite relentless going after anything that moves...but it could be an evil trying to lead others astray. Haven't decided yet.
If I recall correctly it is not unusual for Brandi to put out early lists. I keep notes at home too w/the list of players and jot down little things here and there just to keep myself organized, but atm I don't have enough to publish it. And Brandi, I would be much more concerned about you if you were leaning me innocent. I'm used to not being trusted, lol.
That's exactly my thoughts on JL.
Here are some quotes from jpap,
First he asks a simple question -
She answers -
I chime in (and stir it up a little) -
Now jpap states he was wondering and interested, but it doesn't determine anything -
I chime in again, stirring it up -
Then I ask jpap basicly the same thing he asked noods -
Now, jpap who was just wondering and was interested, looks through the games she has played. After he says that it doesn't matter. Why research it and then call her a liar, if it doesn't matter? I also get an answer to my question, glad he is being "honest". -
Now jpap discovers noods had been evil before (as she claimed) -
dawg points out she was evil before (posted at the same time as jpap) -
My response to the "lying" (posted while jpap was posting) -
I note that it was 3 games ago when noods was evil -
Here jpap explains his mistake, but never really addresses the fact that he called noods a liar or why he continued to persue it if it doesn't determine anything.
I see this as a sign of jpap's evilness because he persued even after he discredited it.
This is my case on jpap. It is weak at best, but of concern to me.
To the part in bold: Where did I flat out call her a liar??? I simply said that based on what I looked into I couldn't find a time where she was evil then I asked how she came up with the thoughts of her being evil. Never once did I say she lied. Also, I don't remember the last time I was evil but I think it was a 50/50 game of sorts. Why don't you go back and research it? Oh that's right, you cant because if you did you would be a hypocrite and that wouldn't look good.
a vicious attack on me.why?i'm just a noob without a clue,and an anoying one at that!The hunch thing was just to see if you would take the bait.I believe you did..sooooo I vote to Lynch Jl
Oh boy...do you really think people are going to fall for that? Baiting by a vet is always a suspicious cover up for a mistake but by a newb, that just seems unreasonable, right? No.
I am suprised to see noods vote for me. I expected DD to vote my way and maybe V2K. My vote staying on jpap has nothing to do with the evil smile. I think I posted why my vote was on him and I have showed a willingness to change it.
I think I have fallen victim to being too vocal on day one and can blame that on my demise. I hope that me having three votes does not put all of the attention on me and players stop posting their thoughts. I am curious of who else votes on me and those that don't who they vote for and why.
I will not change my play just because I have a few votes.
Nice, a backup plan...
Can you see after he says it does not matter, but then goes and researches it, after you gave an answer. That is why I posted the long quotes. If it did not matter, why did he take the time to reasearch it and call you a liar. If it had no importance, then why look into it?
I agree with you and think that past roles gives an indication of how people might be playing this game. Not if they have been given a role this game because of their past roles (or lack of).
1. I've already answered that a million times but you seem so obsessed with it...why do you feel the need to defend your vote every single time it is brought up?
2. If you don't think past roles serve a purpose for determining who might have a good chance of being evil now then why did you think my initial question was a good one? A see some back peddling...
Let me clarify my post above. Noodles posted last night that her main suspects were V2K and Eddie. Then earlier today within 3 hrs of each other 3 votes for JL. The last of whom was Noodles.
Very interesting point. As much as I want to vote JL I really don't want to as noodles and piggy make me uneasy. Sploke, I'm not sure of as of now obviously because he hasn't posted much but has made some decent points.
3L is an odd case atm, but I'm not going to make a guess as to what he is. Mad and plant voting 3L is understandable but I'm not sure if I agree with it right now. I'm not a fan of voting a possible UD at any time and I've used that strategy in the past when I was evil. Just something I'm thinking about.
DD has been defensive but nothing new. She does that almost every game and I would need more before I called her scum.
Eddie and Virt are newbs but the fact that they came out right away and voted is odd, especially as it was both for DD. But I'm giving them a pass.
Cat has posted some good thoughts but then some stuff I'm a little iffy on.
Hooked hasn't said anything controversial enough to comment on. Same really goes for Fire and Dawg, except he is leaning more towards innocent right now for me just based on his helpfulness.
Based on that
I vote to lynch Noodles let's see what comes of that. I'm sure JL will use this in my face...so bring it on.