no, if anyone else posted links to where they were, I would have questioned the validity of them too.... the point is, I pointed out that the links proved nothing in his whereabouts. The reason I posted about the links in the first place is because of exactly what I explained to him..... the links proved nothing. It was an unusual move and seemed desperate to post links in the first place, IMO. I didn't know him from Adam, neither do most aeveryone else... how do they prove where he was... I questioned it and responded to his response... I still don't see how that is making a blowing up things out of proportion... but we all read things differently...
as far as you "not being satisfied with my response", that's fine and up to you... but pappy, it seems now someone else in making a huge issue out of something that is over and done with. Yes, you are correct about one thing... that I decided to tone things down and post more wisely, hence me not "mentioning points already mentioned".... I am posting more wisely because I find it a waste for people to be concentrating on me when there is mafia rooting around and unfortunate for you, at this point pap, I am sorry but it seems you trying to point me out as doing this or not doing that being a huge issue has only made you seem more mafia to me...
I don't understand how I am making a big issue out of it. I mentioned it once and then responded to you. I don't think it is a crime in mafia to dig for the answers...
Well you might as well have posted "I'm innocent" and saved the time and effort of posting a response. Seriously DD, should I believe you after one day? Are you honestly suggesting that I should look elsewhere because you are a deemed innocent? You seem to be pulling a noodles here.
And no need to apologize for being suspicious of me. We always go at it in these games, and we usually both end up wrong. Hopefully someone is right this time, preferably me...