Definitely of interest, but a few things I'm considering:
Plantling's vote for her second candidate (saying that there were enough votes on Kashta) was a bad move, plain and simple. The thing is, I've seen others do the same thing, as town. I don't understand why, but they do it... Last game, Noodles (Communicating Innocent) did the same thing and I (as scum) was able to exploit it a little bit to help make her look scummy. So, I would need to see additional bad behavior from Plantling before voting her. Her last-minute, albeit late, vote change to Kashta was slightly redeeming.
Mad you admit to exploiting little things like last minute vote changes last game to make people look scummy. How can I be sure you aren't doing the same thing this time with Kash? Also how can you be confident of your vote with company like plantling and red? Both, in my book, right now are looking more and more suspicious. Neither have real good explainations for their vote. Plantling says her vote is based on Kash's last minute vote to save herself. (I am not sure how I woulda reacted in Kash's place) Am I supposed to believe that if I am lynched I should just take one for the team and doing anything other than that is considered anti-town? Red still seems to just have some weird personal vedetta against Kash since we were beat last game. Sorry, but just because she was a "bad guy" last time isn't a good reason for a vote this time around. Thoughts?