This looks to be a lame attempt to psych people out of voting you, which in turn looks very scummy...not a very smart move, to be honest.I dare everyone to vote for me, to prove my innocence, and to show of kash is scum.
Jeez sorry guys, sorry I was at a baseball game. I have a life and don't sit on the computer. I still stand by my vote on kash, because she seems like the inconsistent one. To be perfectly honest, if I get lynched, you will see the scum come out on kash. I might have to take one for the townies, for you to see it. I don't have any vendetta against kash, I lasted the whole game last time as in innocent, and I plan on doing it again. Kash just seems a little more defensive then usuall and just seems like scum. If I don't get lynced or hit, rb and coler are next on my list. You got to take one scum down at a time.
What is this pm business? I never got one, and since kashta your a mod, I dare you too look in my pm box. (if you can do that). Or any of the mods, the box is empty.
Jeez sorry guys, sorry I was at a baseball game. I have a life and don't sit on the computer. I still stand by my vote on kash, because she seems like the inconsistent one. To be perfectly honest, if I get lynched, you will see the scum come out on kash. I might have to take one for the townies, for you to see it. I don't have any vendetta against kash, I lasted the whole game last time as in innocent, and I plan on doing it again. Kash just seems a little more defensive then usuall and just seems like scum. If I don't get lynced or hit, rb and coler are next on my list. You got to take one scum down at a time.
What is this pm business? I never got one, and since kashta your a mod, I dare you too look in my pm box. (if you can do that). Or any of the mods, the box is empty.
:rofl:Red how is Kash being scum related to you being lynched? Also, no one is saying you have to be on 24/7 but a bit more posting would be nice, after all you did sign up to play. This goes for CJ as well.
Also, as for your second post, I'm voting for you, does that make Kash scum? :headshake2:
Lastly, Red a question for you: Bubble gum, taffy, hard candy, or lollipop?
ok, now you are playing the newbie card which is rather annoying and highly scummy seeing as you clearly stated in post #87 that you, and I quote, "never got that PM. If you look at the signup thread, I was complaining about not getting one, because I didn't see this thread." So how do you sudden;y not understand the context of the PM talk?What do you mean post more? I got grilled early in the game for posting to much, and now I am posting to less?
It makes kash scum because she pushes so hard to vote me off.
So wait did you vote to lynch me?
And can someone explain this pm business?
Valid point you said it a bit better than I did but same general idea....I just think if kash is lynched and she is innocent we have a whole different ball game. I really don't know for sure but I feel kash is innocent but I may be wrong....My vote stands as of now and plant and TRS are at the top of my list.I have to agree with MC...we may learn about what Kash is but it wont give us much other than a vague direction. If she is a mucs then can we write plant off as innocent? Maybe. But the whole voting for Zig only to have the Kash vote "too late" could be a ploy. Very unlikely but still possible. TRS would be cleared a little bit, same with those who voted Kash night 1, but again you cannot count anyone innocent yet. And if she is innocent can we count everyone else as mucs? Obviously not, and I know everyone knows that but I am starting to think that maybe Kash isnt the smartest vote as of now. It would help to move on with her out of the spotlight but I would rather wait and choose a more thought out candidate. I would like to vote based on concrete evidence right now rather than the possiblities. As I have said before, Kashta may very well be a good PR so is it worth lynching her just because we might look at a few people a little differently? I don't think so. In the end she may be my choice, but I will wait until I have my responses responded to again.