UV Sterilizer to get rid of algae?

Status
Not open for further replies.

stratusfearrr

AC Members
Feb 25, 2009
870
0
0
UV will only get rid of Green water type of algae.
 
so it won't get rid of the hair algae that seems to be all over my broad leafed plants?
 
So instead of adding a 300+ dollar co2 setup to my tank, i checked into it and found that a uv sterilizer is supposed to get rid of algae. If i were to add this

http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?c=3578+4393+19643&pcatid=19643

To my 46 bowfront, with 117 watts over it, would i be algae free? Because this is a third of the cost, and is supposed to rid my tank of algae.

HELP

UV WILL kill green water algae. It WILL NOT kill algae on the plants, on ornaments, on the glass, etc. However, I have noticed it does lessen these outbreaks, at least for some species--but I would not consider it a first line defense to them, the non-green water algaes.

However, it will, if used at sufficient watts per gallon, kill ICK, parasites with vulnerable life-cycles, some semi-rare worms/nematodes with suitable life cycles, etc.

I don't know why most seem to consider UV a luxury or unnecessary (even the local "guru" here are the LFS scoffs at UV--BUT, he runs one on every tank in his store!--think about, I think you will know why); I consider UV a requirement.

Over a relative short period of time, UV will pay for itself. Medications and antibiotics have skyrocketed in costs, since I first began fish keeping ... I mean, you will see some spend $400.00+ on a filter system and scoff at UV, strange in my humble opinion.

Check ebay out, you just might be surprised how cheap external 9w - 36w units are ... just pop one in the filters output or push the water through with a power-head/pump.

Regards,
TA
 
Last edited:
So instead of adding a 300+ dollar co2 setup to my tank, i checked into it and found that a uv sterilizer is supposed to get rid of algae. If i were to add this

http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?c=3578+4393+19643&pcatid=19643

To my 46 bowfront, with 117 watts over it, would i be algae free? Because this is a third of the cost, and is supposed to rid my tank of algae.

HELP


It sounds like you either need C02 or less light and to add dry fertilizers of you arent already. Your plants are consuming the what is fueling the algea so it continues to grow. Plants that are deprived of nutrients wont be able to absorb then as fast as the algae is which is casuing it to grow.
 
Than brings forth the myth(s) ...

UV sterilizers will only get rid of free floaters...you have some sort of imbalance in the tank. Better to fix that than get something that will only mask the problem.

UV is NOT a VALID fix? Strange thinking and logic there! The only dark water, no light and UV I know of, where fish live, is in underground caves. In some caves, New Mexico, Mexico, etc. blind cave fish do inhabit light-less and UV dark waters.

UV is only duplicating mother nature, it is "holistic" and "organic", so even those hypersensitive individuals should have NO problem with UV--a natural requirement for life in a balanced eco-system!

UV promotes the general "natural balance" of any aquarium. Indeed, any aquarium not exposed to natural sunlight, or at least direct sun though a window for sufficient periods, can NEVER REALLY be balanced--you simply have removed one important aspect of the natural environment--if no UV is present.

Some focus on the "redox thing" (reduction-oxidation reaction) as the most important aspect--that it just naturally promotes better fish health--this may, or may not be, I simply lack the tools to confirm/test it. But, you CAN see definite improvements in a system WITH UV.

And, if someone who is running UV, and for sufficient period of time(s), ever tells me their fish don't appear more healthy, colorful, energetic, with pristine fins, scales, clear eyes, are prone to be more disease free,etc.--I would accuse them of FIBBING!

One other just "side thing" you will notice, the water just smells better after a couple of weeks! It begins to smell like you smell around a healthy pond, or clear pristine mountain stream--a woodsy, humus type smell, even if the aquarium has NEVER smelled this way before.

I am saying, those who have not ever ran UV, and PROPERLY, are the only ones willing to deny the benefits.

I am saying, the ONLY valid reason NOT to run UV is that you just can't afford it! And, if that is the case, stop buying million dollar filters and equipment and spend a bit on UV!

Regards,
TA
 
Last edited:
Thats fine. If algae comes up there is an underlying issue that generally can be "fixed". I believe that when it comes to planted tanks especially, theres really no need. I would much rather tweak something that will both a) benefit my plants in the long run and b) rid myself of the algae. You can find plenty of nice, balanced tanks w/ healthy plants and no algae that do not use UVs.

So IMO its not just that I cannot afford one, although thats certainly a factor, but I see no NEED. A difference of opinion.
 
Thats fine. If algae comes up there is an underlying issue that generally can be "fixed". ...

That is yet another myth! If you don't have algae fighting for a stand in your aquarium, something is WRONG.

Again, algae is a natural part of any aquatic eco-system which is healthy and in which the inhabitants are in good health ... "we" just don't find algae to be esthetically pleasing and/or find it can out compete plants, and quick!

Aquarium maintenance will always be a necessity, a battle with algae will always be ongoing, if not, probably nothing else will be alive in the tank either!

Algae is a control problem--it can only be controlled ... the means to accomplish that are many (thank goodness!) Those are a matter of opinion and personal choice.

Regards,
TA
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
AquariaCentral.com