What is the point in keeping a vote on someone after they've declared themselves out of the game?
I honestly thought that once H20 saw Woods post that he would declare him to be dead, as stated in the rules.
I actually thought it was peculiar that you voted for him after he declared his intention to not play. Why vote for a dead man? In my opinion that is the most useless vote you can make. If he changed his mind and played, it would be near unanimous against him right now, to the point that we wouldn't be able to discuss anything else. So the only question about his certain death was whether it happened last night or tonight.
I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm just questioning your strategy here, I don't think your vote on a dead lead is scummy. But I do think that you're over thinking the situation.
Zaffy, the point was we didn't yet know if the guy was serious about quitting... telling us he is "going to" UD isn't the same thing as quitting the game. And Ice didn't jump in to kill him off either when this came up well BEFORE nightfall.
If everyone had pulled votes off Woodward we'd be powerless to counter a last-minute vote he might place by switching to him so he'd get lynched instead. He had to be kept within at least a vote or two of the lynch or the idiot might still be in the game today. Both Jpappy and Dawg posted comments saying the exact same thing.. whatever we believe now of their real intentions.