Did anyone really kick bushes?: We voted for FF or tried to tell LR why we shouldn't vote for LR.
Mafia #67 - 50/50 -- The Play
- Thread starter dirtydawg10
- Start date
Because she has in the past and I think this time gone with unwavering certain after someone. She was wrong but she was innocent. The gun slinger game she did not do that.
So I , I know another broken rule, changed my mind. Dare I type the words.
Without getting into a semantics argument I'm more concerned with Annie's lack of follow up on his questions.
The fact that you've used nearly the same reasoning for thinking that Lab is both scummy and innocent is what I find suspicious...not that you changed your mind.
I guess that is one way to look at it. I see those two statements as completely different.
Who did you vote for by the way?
Yes I'm still here, on and off today... reading the thread over again at the moment to see what I can find.
I've noticed comments here and there where various people wonder or suspect me for being quiet. You'll all have to get used to that, I'm afraid. It's been this way for the most part the last 4 games in a row and I doubt it's going to get any better. In two of those games (both innocent), I nearly UD'd before getting the thread read and my vote made after getting home late. Last game when I went after Noodles (Railroad Owner), that was because (1) I'd been given her role from the start, and (2) I also knew that course of action would get me killed right away... but that was okay because I don't have as much time to spend on the computer anymore.
As far as me being noted on various suspect lists, I'm fine with that too. You all know me well enough to keep me in mind as a possible suspect in these games. I'd be surprised and probably disappointed if you didn't.
Now... after having to trudge through 500+ frigging messages debating FF and his posting a few times, going back through Day 1's events again looking for something relevant to comment on or ask about is a bit of a chore. And we've lost an innocent townie thanks to all that. While that discussion did generate a good volume of posting, I don't believe the content and interaction was all that useful in the larger scheme of this game. It distracted us from whatever other discussion we would have exchanged instead, allowed the scummy half of the town to stay out of the limelight, and sent the innocents chasing each other around in circles.
Thank goodness it's a new day... maybe we'll be able to get somewhere now.
Back to the thread again, I'll be posting again soon.
Hi Annie!
I think I could post War and Peace and I would still hear how I do not post any good ideas. Once you get a label you keep it.
Agreed.
I'm thinking JB too.
What do you think about his idea that we could learn more from lynching anyone but FF. Did that seem like his motives were scum driven to you?
I know, I laughed out loud.
Like I said before, I post what I can, when I can. I don't expect I'll be getting the coveted ACVille citizen of the year award anytime soon, but I'm trying.
Hoping someone will latch onto this Pap?
I have alot going on in real life atm. I am trying not to make that an excuse, and to keep caught up on the game.
My whole operating theory yesterday was FF was a scumbag and the ones trying to defend him were as well. Rather than continue to add to the confusion of yesterday, I decided to wait until FF was lynched and go from there.
Guess what? FF wasn't a scumbag; but I still believe there were scum trying to save him because they thought, like myself and several others thought, that he was NCM.
JB and JL come to mind in this regard. Ice to some extent. Maybe more, I havent had time to carefully review yesterdays posts again.
In this post you're either:
#1: actually concerned about my lack of follow up.
#2: a scummy weasel looking for your next lynch.
Which one is it? I will be following up on this question.
