Mafia 73: Werewolf Game!

I'm thinking we're safe with an estimate of 3-4 as I really don't see even FF putting up 5 wolves against a town of 10. Wouldn't be fair numbers for the town imo. Of course, that's me trying to get into FF's brain. :crazy:



:jaw:



:omg: Did not need to know that bit of information there Chill...


I agree that the tone didn't fit with the mood of the town at the time. What I can't get over is how differently this play would be for JM compared to how he played as a vampire. Right now, that's the biggest thing preventing me from voting for him.



Agree that LG is giving me a bad vibe. Not only is she finger-pointy, she's pointing at the wrong people for saying things. Almost like she doesn't care who she points at as long as she's pointing at someone. Wonder what knowledge she has that others don't...feel like howling there LG?


WTF is up with all the PR discussion? I already gave UN the :thumbsdown:. It's not productive for the town to discuss PRs, only helps the flea-bags.

LR I just want to say thank you. I won't have to jump all over you for speculating this time around. :clap:
 
Fair enough, RL has to play a major part in the game.



Better to look away from you? Is that what you're saying? ;)





Not what I'm saying at all. What I'm saying, if you look again; is to look at whatever seems important to you. But remember that we're playing THIS game. Other games can be good points for comparison; but can also be highly misleading. I'm also saying don't trust anyone unless you're communicating with them outside the thread.
 
OK... so Pappy and Zaffy jumped on JM (righteously, IMO) for scummy behavior. I get that. But there's something that sticks out to me:
Here pappy says he's gone through a few games to check on day 1 voting.

Now here, Pappy states to Kash that he's not going back to check how many wolves were in the old game.

I don't get why you would go back and check on something to accuse JM, while at the same time not go back to check on something that could be good info for the town to have. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not faulting you for not checking the old game. Hell, I'm not going back to check either. What draws my attention is that you are okay with doing the work for the accusation, but not to gain information. That seems... unPappy-like to me.

As far as JM is concerned... I do see why everyone else is jumping. But I have to say for the record; I don't like the train. At all. My vote won't be going to JM tonight even if the only reason is to keep people looking for other suspects. I also agree with Labby's thougts. JM is rightfully under the microscope, but I want to see more before voting anyone.

Jm, I know that is false because I read through a few games you have played and joke votes have been posted on D1. I've even seen you do it at least once.

Jpap says he even found where JM participated in joke voting.

Why would Jpap go this out of his way to nail JM on day 1? I'm feeling like keeping my vote where it is at this point.
 
Jpap says he even found where JM participated in joke voting.

Why would Jpap go this out of his way to nail JM on day 1? I'm feeling like keeping my vote where it is at this point.

So you're going to follow him despite him not even mentioning the thread?
 
Jpap says he even found where JM participated in joke voting.

Why would Jpap go this out of his way to nail JM on day 1? I'm feeling like keeping my vote where it is at this point.
The thing that really bothers me about the whole JM deal, is that I can see how it would seem that it was getting out of hand, and how it could irritate someone.

A couple things bug me about it. 1. the joke votes don't usually extend to the mod, his computer, etc. 2. my recollection of the last few games is that they've started off pretty hard-core. A lot of the day 1's recently have been pretty contentious and heated. This day 1 took me by surprise as well. I'm just (apparently) not as tightly wound as JM.

Looking at it this way, I can see where JM's coming from. If he is indeed evil, then this is a hell of a change up from last game where he fooled everyone but Kash. I don't buy it. If he's innocent, then Pappy's either being his over zealous day 1 self, or doing a hell of a set-up job.

As far as why JM on day 1... why not? IF Pappy is wolven, why not go after someone; anyone day 1? He's usually vocal, and I don't think anyone would think twice about Pappy going after someone day 1 and being wrong.

Thinking about it now, I'd have to lean both of them innocent for putting their necks out like they have. But it's early yet.

My vote will likely not end up on either of these two tonight.
 
incase i dont get here tomorrow night, i better get a real vote in now...


I Retract my vote on FF, and vote to lynch Zaffy, just so i dont UD
 
So you're going to follow him despite him not even mentioning the thread?

Read closer, I'm keeping my vote on Pappy for the moment. Frankly, I don't think you're scum.

incase i dont get here tomorrow night, i better get a real vote in now...


I Retract my vote on FF, and vote to lynch Zaffy, just so i dont UD

There's the Rocker I remember! Welcome back.
 
it feels good to finally vote for you again Zaf!
 
Ok, not sure what my schedule holds tomorrow, so I need to go ahead and place a vote before going to bed. I've been going back and forth among Zaffy, jpap, and jm for my vote. As I said prior, I'm not really comfortable putting my vote on jm at this point. Jpap may be being his usual aggressive day 1 self, but I don't like how he and Zaffy have been mimicking each other in their posts, then kinda, sorta, kicking at each other. Zaffy is very good at being evil, I've been on enough evil teams with him to know how well he can fly under the radar. Therefore, he will earn my vote for day 1.

I vote to lynch the flea-bitten scum known as Zaffy.
But not his dog since his dog is cute.
 
AquariaCentral.com