Mafia 81: The Bloody Coup

Once an innocent gets lynched its game over since the scum can control the lynch. They dont need to kill you at all...they wont be voting for any one of themselves so Ice might as well call the game since the town would be outnumbered.



How so? FF followed my train of thought that I actually ended up modifying slightly. I definitely thought that a list or a name was fine so long as they could back it up with a reason, which I wasn't sure if that was acceptable at first.

The plan mentioned I did not agree with was them just listing their top four suspects straight up.

Here is the precursor to my hypothetical statement 2H so you don't miss it. How you thought I was talking about leading up to tonight, I have no idea.
 
I'd say that was pretty close, but there is a lot more in there that the writer is telling you that if the game continues you could use. Look at the line
they wont be voting for any one of themselves.

How could he know that?
I read that as maybe it's already been discussed, and the writer already seems to know what is going to happen tonight. I don't talk about it in the thread, but I do make a note of it, and watch to see if it comes true.

If I think it's important enough I bring it up in the thread, but you have to remember it could cause you some grief.
I also consider that in this case it went to a known innocent. I would have included something like "WE" can't let this happen, and here is what I think "WE" should do.
Notice how those things are missing?
Now you look at the fact that this post came from a very good player like Pap, and maybe you have a solid clue to his role.

It's a training exercise Pap. I thought I would try to help FF become a better player.
But as long as you brought it up would you care to comment on the pretty blue parts.
 
I already told you that I was saying AFTER AN INNOCENT IS LYNCHED hypothetically the CIA wont be voting for themselves. Can you honestly tell me that any team that knows each other would seriously start taking out their own teammates after taking control of the lynch?

So no, I do not know what is happening tonight. And if I already knew what to do I would have said so.
 
Well I'm back and there's not much else to say. We need a clue on the CIA team and that will come when we lynch one of them. Since we need to keep the innocent vote united and we know what 2H is...I retract my vote for Chill and vote to lynch JPap.

Unfortunately one innocent for sure is on me. I don't see the innocent vote being unanimous since I wont be voting for myself.

My bet is that the some CIA will jump on me later claiming exactly what you just said as a reason to vote me.

My best guess for the scum team is DD, NPR, maybe Chill and maybe Rich.
 
Sorry that was in reply to Labby.
G's play is typical and my gut read on G is that she is not scum.

My gut says the opposite on Noods.

Sorry for the confusion.

Chill's thoughts on LG not being scum.

G, you really think a Mafia team is going to "wait anything out"? From what I can recollect of being on any teams, once it looked like anyone from the team was getting an accumulation of votes, the towel was thrown in and that person was considered the game free-throw.... meaning, the entire team was sure not to protect whomever, and neither did we out anyone else. I think you've been in enough games to know this instead of throwing an idea to get people thinking the mafia HAVE to be thinking this way... sorry.... out of all the posts, this one seems to be the one that is the most manipulating... aside from Noods' posts that is (sorry Noods, just not seeing you as so innocent this game). When I vote though, due to the length of time though, I am voting G because of this.... however, I think it'd be a good idea to really read through Noods' posts (some are quite long) to see just what that Noodle is up to.

<snip>

I vote to lynch LG

DD votes LG

Labby, Chill isn't calling LG innocent, he is saying he really doesn't think she is scum. From my experience, although this may look like it's saying the same thing, there is a fine line of difference.

Then she defends Chill saying he doesn't mean that LG is innocent.

I didn't mean to imply he was saying she was innocent, rather that I see nothing innocent in how she's posted and was wondering what he saw.

Lab comments on what DD says.

What's the fine line DD?
It's true I don't know she's innocent, I think she is but I don't know.

Chill comes back actually saying that he thinks LG is innocent.

FF, you mean to tell me that Noods does not look suspicious to you at all? Tell me why

DD totally misreads FF's list and then they go head to head with DD going missing in the past 24+ hours.

Chill trying to connect me and FF along with his late vote on Pir also stand out to me.

I would be comfortable voting either DD or Chill at this point. However I doubt what I have to say is going to mean much with the towns self appointed leader gunning for my head.
 
AquariaCentral.com