Mafia #89 Trouble in Kindergarten

I do agree, if FF were innocent Zaffy would have probably called the game right then and there so I too assume him to be a bully.
 
So many good arguments and I have such a weak mind.

I do not like that Wiz all of a sudden thinks I might have been on to something, great way to get some one to vote the way you want. Right now I see Wiz as the scummiest, he has not rung true or impressed me with his thoughts at all this game. I should be back on by the lynch and will change my lynch vote if needed.

I vote to lynch Wiz.
 
So many good arguments and I have such a weak mind.

I do not like that Wiz all of a sudden thinks I might have been on to something, great way to get some one to vote the way you want. Right now I see Wiz as the scummiest, he has not rung true or impressed me with his thoughts at all this game. I should be back on by the lynch and will change my lynch vote if needed.

I vote to lynch Wiz.

If you remember I did ask if you saw something that I didn't when you first voted Ice. So tell me what has changed that since yesterday Ice isn't scum?
 
I thought I had posted already, doesn't seem like it went through... I said that I did not know if I was going to make it back here in time for night fall and I am sure no one will be surprised at my vote.

I vote to lynch Wiz....
 
Maybe I am missing something, explain to me like I am in kindergarten so I can understand, exactly how did I "latch on" to you. You are very good at using power words and phrases to stress how right you are and make someone look scummy.

As to stressing the twins it was to get your attention. You seemed to gloss over the fact that it was tied when I placed my vote. I had no idea anyone would switch to Noods and yet, I didn't vote there to insure an innocent got lynched. By golly you are right. According to you it was a three way tie of innocents up for the lynch and I didn't go voting one of them like you did with UN. I must be evil.

So latching on is a strong word, maybe tailgating is better.

I'd have to say I doubt you'd think we'd let it end in a tie and figured someone would move.

I'd really like to know what is your real excuse as you gave 2 different reasons to why you didn't vote Noods.

Wiz you seemed to have a problem with Noods wasted vote near night fall, then you did the same thing tonight voting DD when there was a 3 way tie.

To be honest, I didn't know what the vote count was. I wasn't sure where to place my vote. The issue I had with Noods vote was that she pulled it from pir to not waste it then placed it where it would not affect the lynch one way or the other. I asked her opinion why it was different as she was the one to say she didn't want to waste her vote.

Then I had to ask repeatedly what made the difference in her mind to get an answer.

This sounds like you would have voted her if you knew


Then above you state you wouldn't vote her because you didn't feel a scum vibe from her.


Also now that stated you think FF was scum what do you make of his list of suspects?
 
I'm going to assume FF was scum or Zaffy is just wasting our time because it would be tied 3-3 or there were only 2 scum to begin with.

At first, I presumed FF must be scum too or why wouldn't Zaffy just call the game? I decided not to make that assumption though for several reasons.

1. Mr. Zaffy is a meanie. ;)

2. Just because FF lost access to the site and Zaff knows he will UD at nightfall doesn't mean there's anything that says the game mod HAS TO end the game immediately for that reason. FF didn't PM the mod to quit the game voluntarily, so he still "lives" until his death actually takes place. Technically, the UD doesn't occur until nightfall events happen so why kill the game prematurely?

3. As game mod, Zaffy had to make a choice. If Zaffy ended the game now it would be solely because of FF's behavior. Who wants their game ruined for a reason like that? Counting FF as a UD instead (despite the circumstance) allows the game to still run it's natural course... even that's the same result (game ends).

4. And, most importantly, Mr. Zaffie is a meanie. :p:

I don't agree that FF's role is a foregone conclusion. We should consider all options, not be short sighted or limit our view of the game based on speculation.
 
So latching on is a strong word, maybe tailgating is better.

I'd have to say I doubt you'd think we'd let it end in a tie and figured someone would move.

I'd really like to know what is your real excuse as you gave 2 different reasons to why you didn't vote Noods.





This sounds like you would have voted her if you knew


Then above you state you wouldn't vote her because you didn't feel a scum vibe from her.


Also now that stated you think FF was scum what do you make of his list of suspects?

My reasons are as stated, I was thinking it contradictory the way she made her vote switch in her post. Then it appeared as though she evaded my question on it. after she explained fully I was satisfied with her explanation. I did not think her scum. I also truly at the time of my vote did not realize it was tied. Yes I posted a vote count an hour earlier that you had to fix. Had I been conscious of the 3 way tie, I probably would have voted Rich to avoid a no lynch so we could learn something. I had not looked that closely at you yet as I was under the impression DD was trying to set both of us up with her posts about you directing attention away from me.

FF's suspect list. I can't really make out what he is saying as to why. His post is so loaded with bad attitude that it is coming through with his reasons. I haven't played in a while and can't remember if FF is the type to mention team mates in his list. I will go back and reread his post again and look into the ones he pulled to try to form an opinion if you like.

My view would probably be jaded though as I think DD and you round out the team after last night and the wording of some of your posts.
 
It actually makes a lot of sense, Ice. I didn't think of FF's role in those terms. He almost has to be a bully... which is kind of ironic in my mind. I also have to agree that that being the case, Kash almost has to be innocent based on his attack on her. Hence... I retract my vote on Kash and vote to lynch DD. I still have some hesitation on Wiz. If FF is a bully, then it seems we've got a little breathing room.


Question JB...

If you think Kash almost has to be innocent then why not the same consideration for DD as he posted against her also. What do you make of his list?
 
It actually makes a lot of sense, Ice. I didn't think of FF's role in those terms. He almost has to be a bully... which is kind of ironic in my mind. I also have to agree that that being the case, Kash almost has to be innocent based on his attack on her. Hence... I retract my vote on Kash and vote to lynch DD. I still have some hesitation on Wiz. If FF is a bully, then it seems we've got a little breathing room.

I find your logic there to be confusing, JB. If I almost have to be innocent because FF (presumed evil) attacked me..... then why vote DD?

The same reasoning you apply to me also applies to DD. FF named DD as his top suspect and listed my name below hers. Based on your reasoning, wouldn't that make both DD and me innocent, not just me alone?

Even that is based on assumption.... that FF was scum.
 
Good lord. You creep me out, Ice.
 
AquariaCentral.com