Mafia 92: Night of the living Mafia... the play

[IceH2O]

You covered if Mad is innocent then Doom and Rich are scum
and if mad is scum Doom and Rich are innocent.

Other possibilities include:
Mad-I, Doom-I, Rich-I;
Mad-I, Doom-S, Rich-I;
Mad-I, Doom-I, Rich-S;
Mad-S, Doom-S, Rich-I;
Mad-S, Doom-I, Rich-S;

Are you intentionally disregarding all of these possibilities, or did you really not think of them?

That is not at all what I said, maybe you should skim less and read more intently.

I agree and disagree, yes there won't be much info and without info the hit would probably be misplaced but at the same time how many times have you had a gut feeling about someone but had no way to prove it and were right. I'd hate to be lynched and not be able to take a shot especially if it turns out I was right about who I wanted to hit. I guess what I'm saying is just use your own judgement.

On that note I do think I'll watch you 3, doubt all 3 are mafia as the posting is to close but I could see Mad being mafia and thinking up the idea or Rich or Doom being mafia latching onto an innocent Mad idea.

That isn't what I'm saying exactly.

I'll break it down. Its really an either or situation.

Mad mafia- Posts this idea to look pro town, I mean really did it have to be posted?
Mad innocent- Posts this idea but worded it badly. Should have been more on the point of making sure you took as long as possible to make a choice. Asking someone to not take a shot is wrong IMO as its part of their game.

If Mad is innocent then its possible that Doom or Rich would think the town would agree and are latching on.

If Mad is mafia its possible that Doom or Rich are innocents that bought into the plan or one of them could be mafia trying to reinforce the idea.

Pretty sure this last post covered all possibilities.


So are you hoping others skimmed and would take what you said as an honest post or would you like to admit you were wrong. Same question Mad, did you misread what I wrote or was it purposely done to try and make me look bad. I ask you since you were kind enough to pull Dooms post to make sure i answered it.

Now I'll read what I have skipped to see if I can add anything more but I'm pretty sure my vote stays as it is unless its needed to be moved to Doom to break a tie.

 

[[AC] C-note]

No, I am saying there is a difference between what you are saying and what you are actually doing.

When I said you should have questioned the reasoning, the REASONING, behind the vote you responded that you were getting at that with your questions. When I then said that no, that was what Lab was doing you turned around and said that it was about Tank throwing away the vote.

Your inconsistencies are showing.

lab was getting at that the vote was on DDay....I was getting at the act of voting itself.

 

[user_name]

no LG yet?

 

[Madcrawdad]

So are you hoping others skimmed and would take what you said as an honest post or would you like to admit you were wrong. Same question Mad, did you misread what I wrote or was it purposely done to try and make me look bad. I ask you since you were kind enough to pull Dooms post to make sure i answered it.

Never pulled it, just pointed it out. My issue is you that you never acknowledge that all 3 could be innocent. Was that purposely done to make us look bad?

You take an early, seemingly innocent exchange, and you're suddenly labeling at least one in the group as scum. Right?

I agree and disagree, yes there won't be much info and without info the hit would probably be misplaced but at the same time how many times have you had a gut feeling about someone but had no way to prove it and were right. I'd hate to be lynched and not be able to take a shot especially if it turns out I was right about who I wanted to hit. I guess what I'm saying is just use your own judgement.

On that note I do think I'll watch you 3, doubt all 3 are mafia as the posting is to close but I could see Mad being mafia and thinking up the idea or Rich or Doom being mafia latching onto an innocent Mad idea.

That isn't what I'm saying exactly.

I'll break it down. Its really an either or situation.

Mad mafia- Posts this idea to look pro town, I mean really did it have to be posted?
Mad innocent- Posts this idea but worded it badly. Should have been more on the point of making sure you took as long as possible to make a choice. Asking someone to not take a shot is wrong IMO as its part of their game.

If Mad is innocent then its possible that Doom or Rich would think the town would agree and are latching on.

If Mad is mafia its possible that Doom or Rich are innocents that bought into the plan or one of them could be mafia trying to reinforce the idea.

 

[IceH2O]

There is a lot busier a 1st day then I remember in past games. No one person has me feeling any better about them then another. Its a lot of digging though so I do like this and should help in the following days.

A lot of reaching but its Day 1, I can see where Noods is going and it wouldn't be the 1st time mafia slipped on day 1 but I can also see how it could be just badly worded.

There really is to much going on to just sit and post about it all. If you have a certain question about a certain player and what I'm thinking I'll read those interactions and answer.

Right now Mad and Doom are my top 2. Razz a distant 3rd because it could be a slip but Mad is voting him(?) and I don't think as close as the voting is that it would be distancing.

 

[jpappy789]

lab was getting at that the vote was on DDay....I was getting at the act of voting itself.

yes, the REASONING behind the vote. so when your response to me saying that you should have been questioning the REASONING behind vote was that your questions were doing that what did you actually mean?

 

[Madcrawdad]

no LG yet?

Didn't you tell Jpap that you were going to be posting some quotes that you pulled? Did I miss them?

 

[IceH2O]

Never pulled it, just pointed it out. My issue is you that you never acknowledge that all 3 could be innocent. Was that purposely done to make us look bad?

You take an early, seemingly innocent exchange, and you're suddenly labeling at least one in the group as scum. Right?

Isn't that an implied statement when you put out the other scenarios? Does everything have to be typed out?

No I'm not labeling anyone scum,just listing the possibilities of IF one is scum how the other 2 could fit into the scenario.

 

[jpappy789]

fair enough, my wording is poor. My main concern with Tank's vote is the fact that it is random and on an off player, yes to me it looks like an attempt to toss a vote to protect themself from having to make a game effecting decision. Yes I'm aware that Labby brought up the "train" bit, but AGAIN my concern with Tanks vote had nothing to do with on whom the vote was placed but the fact that it was a wasted vote.

As to Kash's vote on 2H, yes it appears tossed but I'd need to read further into their interaction and posts to make a solid opinion.

Also let me know Cnote when you get that solid opinion...

 

[jpappy789]

Didn't you tell Jpap that you were going to be posting some quotes that you pulled? Did I miss them?

I believe so but I couldn't tell if those couple of quotes that were there was everything or not...was there more UN?