Mafia 92: Night of the living Mafia... the play

lol...just picking on you DD. You know I love ya!
LOL I know, I know
Now this just blows my mind. You claim that you weren't building a case on Noods. Yet you have been all over her this game. Now right after nightfall you post this. Is this another attempt to get Noods lynched without building a case on her?

It is posting like this that makes me suspect you so much.
what?! Where in the world are you seeing this from my post?? If anyo0ne looks like they are trying at attempting to get anyone posted, it's you.

DD, where did you ever explain that you didn't want to tie it? You voted Jm (which made it 3-3 Jm and Cnote) and went off on the whole "slip" stuff with Noods. I don't see you ever acknowledging that you even tied the vote, unless I missed something.

I find it odd that that you also say something about possibly voting Jm but Kash is basically forcing you to vote for her and just yesterday it was the other way around. The wording is just interesting...
I posted it around the time I voted for JM the first night. You know, the comment.... someone (I forget who) said I was talking about someone else but I was not. I explained that in a later post too...

sheesh, with all the attention I am getting this game, you would think people would be a little more careful and less skimful of my posts. I didn't say I tied a post. Someone said they were voting JM because they did not want to see a tied vote because that would result in no lynching. I said I would save them the trouble. (not that exact wording but close to it).

Kash's behavior had been more concerning as of late. Moreso than JM..... so what is it now, Paps... I am supposed to suspect someone and then continue to suspect them to the end?

or wait.... or is it that you are trying to deflect the fact that you were the last one on to the JM train....?
 
DD, the only thing I am trying to get is scum. As I stated earlier there is too much scumminess in the game for all to be scum but your posts have jumped of the monitor screaming scum.

Read your posts objectively and tell me I am wrong.
 
I can see everyone's thoughts on JM and DD. They have been acting strangely this game as well but not as much as Wiz IMO. C-Note I was ready to vote on but I really am not sure. I think they would have been participating more right now if scum. I don't see too many scum come close to UDing very often. I don't have a problem with voting either DD or JM though. There just seems to be so many players who are off their game this round that it is tough to stick with one. DD I see a bit lower on the list only because I am used to her skimming and confusing issues. It is par for the course :lipssealedsmilie:

Right now Wiz, Kash and Ice have me the most worried. If my vote is needed I will be around to take out JM or DD though if it becomes a voting issue close to night.

What have I done to cause you worry?
 
DD, where is this phantom post you speak of???

Here is the vote on JM:

LOL I know, I know

what?! Where in the world are you seeing this from my post?? If anyo0ne looks like they are trying at attempting to get anyone posted, it's you.


I posted it around the time I voted for JM the first night. You know, the comment.... someone (I forget who) said I was talking about someone else but I was not. I explained that in a later post too...

sheesh, with all the attention I am getting this game, you would think people would be a little more careful and less skimful of my posts. I didn't say I tied a post. Someone said they were voting JM because they did not want to see a tied vote because that would result in no lynching. I said I would save them the trouble. (not that exact wording but close to it).

Kash's behavior had been more concerning as of late. Moreso than JM..... so what is it now, Paps... I am supposed to suspect someone and then continue to suspect them to the end?

or wait.... or is it that you are trying to deflect the fact that you were the last one on to the JM train....?

Holy smokes, I don't ever remember a Day 1 being so busy before!!



I dunno.... ever since Noods played the typo's are scum card, I guess I am a bit more alert to the "slips" posts. Could this tie Noods and Labby together, I dunno... but it does look odd.


the bolded point cracked me up


hmmm.... this kinda caught my attention too...


I will bet being scum so there is no need...



sorry, had to work late.... had no clue that day 1 would be so much to read.... 9 pages!!

ok, I didn't really see TOO much that I could find as scummy but let me put it out in a list from what I can pick off the top of my head. These are in no particular order.

Kash - continues to hash and rehash (rehash Kash) on the whole Zombie thing. We have been done with that for a while now... way before her posts about it. This is from Kash, once who pays a great deal of attention to detail.... or what I am used to her paying.

Noods - Typo patrol.... yet feels compelled to proofread her posts and puts out that she sees she has posted something wrong... is it supposed to appear as you are an innocent townie and you have noticed your mistake (or slip) before anyone else?

JM - I think with the whole FF thing and he appearing to be in alliance to FF, he feels like he has escaped being looked at as mafia. He continues to point at how unhelpful everyone else is in his path.... I was going to vote Kash off the top of my head but I feel compelled to vote JM...

CNote, Mad, Ice, Razz.... I can't get a read either way from each because as they are pointed at, they have understandable excuses. Are they scummy excuses? I cannot tell yet.

I vote to lynch JM

This is to Noods:

slips, typos... whatever. I've seen you clear up both in your own posts

Here Jm points out that your vote caused the tie:

Hmm...you have successfully caused a tie. this is interesting.

please show me where i played on the "alliance" with FF. i remember asking Ice a similar question as he did, and then i let the issue drop. FF and a few others brought up my name again along with his own, but i would hardly call that an alliance. c'mon DD, surely you can do better. are you trying to protect someone by causing a tie that will prevent the lynch altogether?

Another response to Noods:

''I wilkl Noods... give me a little bit to go through though...

thinking off the top of my head though, all I did was note on it... got the shakes?

Jb calls night:

It is Night.
 
Sorry I meant to respond to the first quote separately...anyways, no, I am not trying to deflect from the fact that I was last on Jm. I explained why I put my vote there and I think it would have been foolish to place it on either you or Cnote, my other suspects, and allow for someone to tie up the votes and cause a no-lynch when it seemed most votes were pretty much locked in minus yours.

As for the second comment I made, I just thought it was interesting that both nights you have offered up two people as a lynch and then worded it as if the person you voted for forced you to vote them. The first time you were "compelled" to vote Jm, and last night Kash was "screaming" for a vote (or something to that effect).

I do find it possible that you used Kash's posting towards you as a way to get out of voting Jm and thus not having that stain on your voting record. It's a thought I'm mulling over...
 
DD, I think I found the post you were referring to...however when you look at the post in context, it makes absolutely no sense.

I find it interesting that Jm just tied it up, probably nothing with so many left to vote but still he did.

I thin k that JM is scum still don't like his logic. I will change to C-note to break the tie if it comes to it. I just see a whole lot of nothing.

I also do not think these post count discussions ever amount to more than a small hill of kidney beans.

Here Rich mistakenly thought Jm's D1 vote tied up.

I have Cnote in the lead with 3, Rich... am I missing something?

Jb was correct, Cnote was still in the lead.

<snip>
I will bet being scum so there is no need...

<snip>

I vote to lynch JM

You comment on Rich's mistaken post, somehow thinking that your vote on Jm avoids a tie? Problem is you CAUSED a tie. You made it 3-3 Jm and Cnote...DDay switched off Jm onto Razz, Noods switched to Razz and the rest is history...

I did not call Rich scum for that post. I said that there was no need because I had suspected JM as well and voted JM.

I have no problem voting CN or Ice. I wrote that because I had just got home from work and had to read 9 pages for day 1. I skimmed rather quickly and hadn't seen much of the slips or inconsistencies because I didn't feel like I had time to cypher carefully through each post and come to a decision. I just noticed Noods pointing out the slips and thought it odd because I saw her make one or one that could be considered a slip herself. She asked me to gather those posts and I did. [/B]

I didn't spend nearly as much time on Noods as I did for Kash who kept rehashing the zombie business and JM for his misdoings. I said my gut was to vote Kash but I voted JM to save the trouble for Rich.

you sir, are twisting my posts very cleverly though.

Above you clarified your post (I think it was to Wiz) however again your vote did nothing but tie up the lynching.

So I wonder, what "compelled" DD to vote JM just before nightfall. My name wasn't on the list yet, but there was already a vote by 2H sitting on Noods. DD could have reasonably voted there without drawing much attention to herself. (This was while Razz still only had 2 votes himself.)

Oh, I know what it was. Since JM already had 2 votes and you included him in your post already... a vote placed there created that tie between JM and C-Note which totally negated any possibility of a lynch at all.

Very anti-town move on your part; though I'm sure you were ready to "pretend" you didn't know what the vote count was if anyone called you out for it.

Not only would you have managed to block the town lynch by creating that tie, you would be further distancing yourself from JM in the process.

And here Kash calls you out for the tie...

before night call, I had to read quickly as I had gotten off of work late, funny you call me skimming yet you post something like this. After I had a chance to see what was going on thoroughly, I could see and absorb what cnote was doing. I am trying to recall whether cn was actually doing this wishy washy stuff before nightfall or after (I am thinking after) so this reference doesn't even warrant anything except the thought that you are merely trying to twist something up.


I was hoping you caught my new term of "re-Kashing" actually... that said, your game play or the game play I am used to is what is inconsistent. Your gameplay this game doesn't irritate me in the least bit, it just confuses me. I get that your work scene has changed and you are in the office more, I get that you're busy. I am much under the same gun.... what confuses me is the constant reflection of something that was discussed as something that should be dropped...... yet you went on..... and on..... and on.



and here you go.... mentioning the zombies yet again...



it's so funny how both you and Wiz reference someone going to the scuumden. I was referencing you, I am not in a mafia den... I was not the one making such a bother about it all. Everyone kept asking about it so I was responding to it.

I guess I just assumed you printed this when you said:



ok, holy crap, are you really accusing ME of skimming when I have said countless times before that I was not trying to make Noods appear as scum but responding to her post? I felt like my best place to put my vote was on JM, I felt most suspicious of him and explained as much that I wanted to be able to avoid a tie.

drawing attention to myself? I was not trying to blend in, contrary to what you are trying to elude to here. I stated the reason why I voted JM.... it made the most sense for me then. It's peculiar how you have seemed to skim past that but you call me skimming. Or is it that you are TRYING to leave that part out.


please... I am not challenging anyone. Nice case you are trying to build but there are holes Kash..... did you wait for your mafia partners to proof this from you "mafia-den" before placing it here?
so here it is in plain lettering. I could vote JM to go along with everyone else and since he's already been a suspect of mine but Kash, you're screaming for me to vote for you.

I vote to lynch Kash. Yes, I suspect you.

Here you say part of your vote on Jm was to avoid a tie...again, you CREATED a tie...


LOL I know, I know

what?! Where in the world are you seeing this from my post?? If anyo0ne looks like they are trying at attempting to get anyone posted, it's you.


I posted it around the time I voted for JM the first night. You know, the comment.... someone (I forget who) said I was talking about someone else but I was not. I explained that in a later post too...

sheesh, with all the attention I am getting this game, you would think people would be a little more careful and less skimful of my posts. I didn't say I tied a post. Someone said they were voting JM because they did not want to see a tied vote because that would result in no lynching. I said I would save them the trouble. (not that exact wording but close to it).

Kash's behavior had been more concerning as of late. Moreso than JM..... so what is it now, Paps... I am supposed to suspect someone and then continue to suspect them to the end?

or wait.... or is it that you are trying to deflect the fact that you were the last one on to the JM train....?

And now you are misrepresenting what actually happened. Rich said he would switch from Jm to Cnote to break the tie, however at the time there really was no tie as Cnote was still in the lead. You didn't save anyone the trouble because your voted created the actual tie, which was only 25 minutes before nightfall.

You keep calling out people for skimming your posts...but from what I can tell you are the one skimming this game...
 
if you read before that paps, in context of the whole hour I was here, I had many pages to read and admittingly skimmed for the most part. All I noticed was it stated that he did not want to make it a tie so I was making it easier on him because I too suspected JM at the time. As far as it making s34nse or not.... p3rhaps if you would have read through 9 pages quickly in order to get a vote in and not UD, you might have done the same too.... oh waqit... maybe not... because pappy doesn't ever skim and always makes enough time available for the game, right? Like most, I have limited ability to get to the site during the day and have to rely on after I get home from work... while making dinner and cleaning up/.... but you go ahead and continue to consider me super-doll....

I am not the only one that can smell the scum in your posts DD

and this is all you have? You can just smell it? come on, I know your game is better than that.
 
AquariaCentral.com