What did I gain to benefit by pushing for a tie?
I only know UN is scum because of the lynch, I didn't know beforehand same as I don't know AAF is scum or not right now. Only that his actions are scummy and at the time was one of the main places to put a vote. I voted DD for something I think scummy and because AAF isn't a main threat, not as much as DD can be at least. Also at the time of my vote I was hoping for a more spread out vote. But the situation changed so the thought pattern also had to change. Since both were thought scum, thought being the operative word, then there was no reason not to take the chance at the coin flip. If one was innocent and the other scum without any hard proof then I'd rather the coin decide then choose wrong on our own.
If I thought AAF was more likely scum then UN or vice versa I would have just followed the rest onto them and had them hang. AAF already was in the lead and if not hadn't been pushed back would be the one lynched. UN made a bad choice and got piled on only because night lasted longer.
Since you aren't smart enough to figure out the strategy on your own I'll spill some.
At this point there could be as many as 3 communicating players per team. They will not defend one another but if you are innocent and someone comes out and says I think you are innocent then there is a good chance they investigated you and know your innocent, so you can conclude they are on the scum team. Doesn't work as well if they come after you because you can't tell if they are innocents reading you wrong or not unless you see a "team effort" trying to get you lynched.
I only know UN is scum because of the lynch, I didn't know beforehand same as I don't know AAF is scum or not right now. Only that his actions are scummy and at the time was one of the main places to put a vote. I voted DD for something I think scummy and because AAF isn't a main threat, not as much as DD can be at least. Also at the time of my vote I was hoping for a more spread out vote. But the situation changed so the thought pattern also had to change. Since both were thought scum, thought being the operative word, then there was no reason not to take the chance at the coin flip. If one was innocent and the other scum without any hard proof then I'd rather the coin decide then choose wrong on our own.
If I thought AAF was more likely scum then UN or vice versa I would have just followed the rest onto them and had them hang. AAF already was in the lead and if not hadn't been pushed back would be the one lynched. UN made a bad choice and got piled on only because night lasted longer.
Since you aren't smart enough to figure out the strategy on your own I'll spill some.
At this point there could be as many as 3 communicating players per team. They will not defend one another but if you are innocent and someone comes out and says I think you are innocent then there is a good chance they investigated you and know your innocent, so you can conclude they are on the scum team. Doesn't work as well if they come after you because you can't tell if they are innocents reading you wrong or not unless you see a "team effort" trying to get you lynched.
