Mafia 96 Who Are You? Game Thread

IceH2O said:
The final vote tally doesn't show it but you voted Zaffy 1st then UN after his UD vote. At the time AAF was still in the lead, what good was your vote change going to do when you switched to make it a 2 person race.

If you thought being spread out was best then you should have stayed on Zaffy who I moved to also to make a closer 3 way race until I saw the tally was wrong and a vote on Zaffy did no good anymore since you moved?

Your vote on UN just made it a tighter 2 person race so there was no reason or capable way to keep it spread out when 9 of 14 votes were already on 2 players.
Click to expand...

I didn't think it being spread out was best. I thought it best if everyone voted for who they thought was most likely scum. Hence why I immediately changed my vote to UN after he pulled his UD vote. I can understand scum not wanting to have to pick someone that way they can't hide their vote. With it being a tie and UN being proved guilty all the scum are able to justify a vote not on him by saying well I thought we were going for a tie so I kept my vote on AAF even though UN pulled some really scummy stuff.

All the tie did was provide scum cover in their vote. Had UN shown innocent scum could just as easily say well I voted for a tie, wish it had come up AAF.
 
Lab_Rat said:
Have you forgotten you said this:


And you're right, I would have questioned your motives if you said it was a bad idea...but since when are you worried about being questioned? Have something to hide?
Click to expand...

I haven't forgotten that and it certainly hasn't changed. What UN did was extremely scummy, so much to the point that one almost had to question could he actually be innocent after staring at it for 20minutes of people swapping votes back and forth. But the fact is he slipped up and did something extremely scummy, why you would want a tie after something so blatant is beyond me.
 
Dagamoth said:
I haven't forgotten that and it certainly hasn't changed. What UN did was extremely scummy, so much to the point that one almost had to question could he actually be innocent after staring at it for 20minutes of people swapping votes back and forth. But the fact is he slipped up and did something extremely scummy, why you would want a tie after something so blatant is beyond me.
Click to expand...
Because AAF did almost the exact same thing the night before. Tell me, how was it scummy when UN did a last minute vote switch to someone who was about to UD but it wasn't scummy when AAF did a last minute vote switch to someone who was about to UD the night before? Seems like you have a double standard going there. Both blatantly scummy. I haven't voted yet, but my vote will likely go to AAF since I still think he's scum.
 
IceH2O said:
What did I gain to benefit by pushing for a tie?

I only know UN is scum because of the lynch, I didn't know beforehand same as I don't know AAF is scum or not right now. Only that his actions are scummy and at the time was one of the main places to put a vote. I voted DD for something I think scummy and because AAF isn't a main threat, not as much as DD can be at least. Also at the time of my vote I was hoping for a more spread out vote. But the situation changed so the thought pattern also had to change. Since both were thought scum, thought being the operative word, then there was no reason not to take the chance at the coin flip. If one was innocent and the other scum without any hard proof then I'd rather the coin decide then choose wrong on our own.

If I thought AAF was more likely scum then UN or vice versa I would have just followed the rest onto them and had them hang. AAF already was in the lead and if not hadn't been pushed back would be the one lynched. UN made a bad choice and got piled on only because night lasted longer.


Since you aren't smart enough to figure out the strategy on your own I'll spill some.

At this point there could be as many as 3 communicating players per team. They will not defend one another but if you are innocent and someone comes out and says I think you are innocent then there is a good chance they investigated you and know your innocent, so you can conclude they are on the scum team. Doesn't work as well if they come after you because you can't tell if they are innocents reading you wrong or not unless you see a "team effort" trying to get you lynched.
Click to expand...

So you are saying that you thought both were equally scummy? What kind of hard proof would you have needed to actually cast a vote against someone instead of casting a vote for a tie? Seems like the only way you would cast a vote that could cause someone to get lynched would be only if you had investigated them because that is the ONLY way to get hard proof in this game. If that is not scummy I am not sure what is.

As to your "strategy" wtf? That is not a strategy, that is just common sense. Beside the common sense component to that I don't think anyone is going to think anyone is innocent unless you are communicating with them, this format doesn't allow for thinking anyone is innocent.
 
Lab_Rat said:
Because AAF did almost the exact same thing the night before. Tell me, how was it scummy when UN did a last minute vote switch to someone who was about to UD but it wasn't scummy when AAF did a last minute vote switch to someone who was about to UD the night before? Seems like you have a double standard going there. Both blatantly scummy. I haven't voted yet, but my vote will likely go to AAF since I still think he's scum.
Click to expand...

Because it had happened the night before and had put AAF in the hot seat to go and do nearly the exact same thing and complete contradict what you said just a little bit earlier : the "if MC shows up i'll vote for him", yeah not the same thing and a good bit scummier. However it is true that AAF did do something scummy, I am not contesting that. I haven't had a good feeling about either you or Ice this whole game and even said so after day 1. The fact that both of you were pushing spread out and then for a tie does not sit well with me.
 
I don't have a good feeling about anyone this game, I don't see how someone could have a good feeling about anyone with how things have gone so far. You not having a good feeling about me doesn't bug me one bit. I do not have a good feeling about you.

So even though AAF blatantly lied about his reasons for voting then admitted he lied, that didn't strike you as scummy?
 
Lab_Rat said:
I don't have a good feeling about anyone this game, I don't see how someone could have a good feeling about anyone with how things have gone so far. You not having a good feeling about me doesn't bug me one bit. I do not have a good feeling about you.

So even though AAF blatantly lied about his reasons for voting then admitted he lied, that didn't strike you as scummy?
Click to expand...

Even me?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom