Mafia #98: The Grinch Returns -- The Play

Fishfriend1 said:
even if he is telling the truth, we have 3 people on that list. At least one is evil, but the other two are mysteries, and we don't even know which one is the evil. Course, if he is evil, he has at least 1 other person there to help him think up a good role and abilities. Since there is such a margin for error, we could prove his falseness until all three people are dead, at which point the game would be lost. I'm probably not going to pay his RC much credence because of that.
Click to expand...
I think the 1 in 3 odds are better than the 1 in 10 odds and I guess I'm not seeing AAF making this claim as a scum.
 
I was originally thinking the best thing would be to have a 24hr nightfall (for Friday) and then the 26th. However the more I think about it with the way this game is going, I would say the best thing would be to have the next nightfall be the 26th and lock the game Sat and Sun. I just will not have any time at all either of those days and would prefer not to have to play catch up on Monday. Just essentially pause the game and pick it up Monday morning IMO.
 
dirtydawg10 said:
I was originally thinking the best thing would be to have a 24hr nightfall (for Friday) and then the 26th. However the more I think about it with the way this game is going, I would say the best thing would be to have the next nightfall be the 26th and lock the game Sat and Sun. I just will not have any time at all either of those days and would prefer not to have to play catch up on Monday. Just essentially pause the game and pick it up Monday morning IMO.
Click to expand...
:iagree:
 
We could all just agree not to post Sat or Sun, then we don't have to get the Mods involved as I'm sure they (as hard as it is to believe) have more things to worry about then our game being locked and unlocked :evil_lol:

This is IF we all agree to have the extended nightfall with no game play on Sat and Sun
 
I removed quotes not posted towards me...

Fishfriend1 said:
You commented on both of my other thoughts, so I was curious as to why you chose not to comment on dawg there. It seemed like you were ignoring him, and such is still a possibility.

I don't have a gut feel that UN is playing a good game (good as in well played, as in, a vet game more then newb game). That seems apparent from his posting right now. Which means he could be being coached or just playing well. Guess which one I'm worried about.

The gut feel was between 2H, UN, and Dun. That was were I was interested. Any three would have been places to set a vote day 1, but he picked 2H. Without any reason except that it was a gut feel that 2H was scummier then the others.

I felt that LG was playing just townie enough to get past, which is what I was trying to say in my post. Now, it could be that she is a townie, but whenever something like that happens I always keep an eye out. Just the way I play.

I said he is playing well, or at least, that is what I meant by good game. As stated above, it could be him improving or him coached.

Because I stopped my reread when I reached my post yesterday morning. It was, checking back, post 434. I think I made myself pretty clear on my thoughts after that point, no need to re-state it that soon.

Anything concrete? Nope, this game there hasn't been enough to say "YOU ARE SCUM AND I KNOW IT" yet. I only have thoughts, some feelings, and a few small possible cases. Can you honestly say that you have concrete proof that someone playing is evil, without any doubt in your mind?
Click to expand...

I wasn't going to go out of my way to agree with something as trivial (relatively speaking) as Dawg wasn't being very active. It didn't concern me that you said it so I did not comment on it. Simple as that.

The whole "coached" bit is so overused on certain players that it's become an easy way to point suspicion on to someone without needing to grab any posts or do any actual analysis.

No, I never included UN as a player I was going to vote for D1. FF that is a total lie. I was between Dun and 2H and for the bazillionth time I had legitimate reasons for both. The only gut feel was that I just felt 2H's comment was scummier than what Dun did. How is that scummy? Should we examine your D1 vote?

So you didn't want to restate your thoughts on Kash? Do you actually think she is scum or not? I don't understand how you can make an actual list but then leave someone out who earlier you said you could vote for on the spot...

I'm not saying you need to know someone is scum. But other than your supposed case on me your only other suspicions are general statements about game play. Concrete evidence would be some actual posts.

dirtydawg10 said:
What do you think about Kash's D2 vote?

My fixation on Wiz was kicking bushes to see what was there. After seeing Wiz's more recent posts he has dropped down a notch on my list...but he's definitely not off my list.

I have to say I am a bit more interested in AAF's list. If I had to rank the 3 people left I would say Bally, Kash then Rich with Bally seeming the scummiest at this point. I can't really see a reason to doubt AAF's list although I wish he didn't come out with it. Although he may have helped us he also has helped the scum as others have pointed out. I think now that it's out there we need to use it to our advantage.
Click to expand...

I can't really analyze a vote thrown out there to avoid UD. I'm more interested in how she came about her D1 vote and what she said when questioned.

Fishfriend1 said:
Yes, he voted 2H because of the unlynchable thing, but he was perfectly fine with 2H or Dun, and I was wondering why he picked 2H. He said 'Gut feeling" that 2H was scummier then dun.
Click to expand...

What's your point FF? I picked 2H because I felt he was scummier than Dun...should I not be voting for who I think is scummiest?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom