Mafia #99: The ACville Files- Game Thread

dirtydawg10 said:
I understand your job interferes and yes I do know first hand as you suggest. However, I never said it made you more suspicious those are your words.

As far as you VS. Bally...you would rather I voted for a UD?

I couldn't tell if you were evil from your lack of posting. However I thought that the scum were probably hiding in a game where not much posting was going on. I found it odd that you started posting after I called you out and voted you for it. I also know from playing a scum with you that you tend to spend a lot of time defending yourself as scum and not enough time calling people out. I'm getting more of a feeling that you really are scum.
Click to expand...

That "sounds" like a good answer, however.... the problem I have with it is if you are evil then my lack of posting serves as a good "excuse" for you to add your vote to DD's vote against me knowing full well that the town might follow along without questioning your motives. The two of you (if both evil) might then be able to get me institutionalized..... saving you from having to use up a hit to take me out.... also enabling you to target someone else who might foil your scummy plans. A twofer kind of deal like that is appealing for the scum whenever I'm innocent.

The other faulty part of your logic here is the idea that you'd seek out evil from among the low posters in a game that's incredibly LOW in posting across the board. Out of all the people not posting much (me included) only 4 of the players in this game are scum. Low posting is a lousy discriminator to rely on when... (1) most everyone in the game is being quiet, (2) the players not posting a whole lot thus far also includes innocents and townie PRs we wouldn't want to lose by mistake, and (3) that part you've just acknowledged that there really isn't a reliable correlation between my post count and my alignment.
 
For that matter, Dawg.... I've called out 2 players, thus far. How many players have you called out?

1 - DD for falling back to the same sly, manipulative tactic she used against me twice before when she was scum.... but not in games where she was on the town side and actually thought I might be scum. How someone acts toward you in these games is hard not to notice when it becomes a pattern like that.

2 - And now you. Your basis for logical voting isn't very logical after all... if you're really interested in the town's best interests, that is.

As for using the word suspect... you voted me over other players who were quiet. I have to conclude from that fact alone that you either decided I was more suspicious than them, that you wanted me gone because I'm more dangerous to your team than them, or that you didn't vote your top suspect.

Which of the those options do you prefer, since you <<scrolls back to Dawg's post>> never said it made me more suspicious?
 
Great game,loved the final 4 minutes. Pat game was over as soon as it started.....

I'm kind of surprised JB and Dawg didn't get the reference. I'm actually interested in what their 1st thoughts were when they read the headline.


dundadundun said:
alright... all caught up.

i think i'm going to have to agree with this...


dunno about "unsuspicious" moves, though. seems any move can be suspicious at any time, really.

i vote to send ice to the loony bin.

now to get back to making dinner....
Click to expand...


Not sure what you mean here Dun... You agree with Labs post enough to vote me but you don't agree with it. She voted me because she thought scum would make a move to protect FF, but you say any move would be suspicious as I said. So if you agree with me then why did you vote with her?
 
Kashta said:
That "sounds" like a good answer, however.... the problem I have with it is if you are evil then my lack of posting serves as a good "excuse" for you to add your vote to DD's vote against me knowing full well that the town might follow along without questioning your motives. The two of you (if both evil) might then be able to get me institutionalized..... saving you from having to use up a hit to take me out.... also enabling you to target someone else who might foil your scummy plans. A twofer kind of deal like that is appealing for the scum whenever I'm innocent.

The other faulty part of your logic here is the idea that you'd seek out evil from among the low posters in a game that's incredibly LOW in posting across the board. Out of all the people not posting much (me included) only 4 of the players in this game are scum. Low posting is a lousy discriminator to rely on when... (1) most everyone in the game is being quiet, (2) the players not posting a whole lot thus far also includes innocents and townie PRs we wouldn't want to lose by mistake, and (3) that part you've just acknowledged that there really isn't a reliable correlation between my post count and my alignment.
Click to expand...
Twist, twist, twist, defend, defend. I didn't "Add" my vote to DD's...I voted for you first. So you think my odds were bad of finding scum among the low posters? I think I struck a scum nerve and ended up guessing right.

Kashta said:
For that matter, Dawg.... I've called out 2 players, thus far. How many players have you called out?

1 - DD for falling back to the same sly, manipulative tactic she used against me twice before when she was scum.... but not in games where she was on the town side and actually thought I might be scum. How someone acts toward you in these games is hard not to notice when it becomes a pattern like that.

2 - And now you. Your basis for logical voting isn't very logical after all... if you're really interested in the town's best interests, that is.

As for using the word suspect... you voted me over other players who were quiet. I have to conclude from that fact alone that you either decided I was more suspicious than them, that you wanted me gone because I'm more dangerous to your team than them, or that you didn't vote your top suspect.

Which of the those options do you prefer, since you <<scrolls back to Dawg's post>> never said it made me more suspicious?
Click to expand...
More twist, twist, defend, defend. Go back and look at how many I have looked at and called out. I think you're scum. How about you vote for me and I vote for you and let's see who's right?

I vote to send Kash to the looney bin
 
IceH2O said:
Great game,loved the final 4 minutes. Pat game was over as soon as it started.....

I'm kind of surprised JB and Dawg didn't get the reference. I'm actually interested in what their 1st thoughts were when they read the headline.





Not sure what you mean here Dun... You agree with Labs post enough to vote me but you don't agree with it. She voted me because she thought scum would make a move to protect FF, but you say any move would be suspicious as I said. So if you agree with me then why did you vote with her?
Click to expand...
To tell you the truth Ice, my first thought was "WTF does that mean" maybe the beers had something to do with it.
 
well that night sucked. i hate that people UD even though sometimes its hard to not UD, but if you UD every game you really shouldnt play at all vote a when you know you have time. anyway, we really need to root out scum tonight, and looking at the low posters really isnt gonna help.
 
dirtydawg10 said:
I vote to send Kash to the looney bin
Click to expand...

I guess we can take that as an answer to the question you asked Dawg, Labby.... lmao.

From everyone on the list, I count DD and Dawg as suspects so far so I'm happy to vote either of them. Between the two... I guess that depends on which stands a better chance of going to the looney bin as other votes come in.

If I'm right on both or either of them, that amounts to half the scum team. Will still be looking at others between now and Monday night.
 
Kashta said:
I guess we can take that as an answer to the question you asked Dawg, Labby.... lmao.

From everyone on the list, I count DD and Dawg as suspects so far so I'm happy to vote either of them. Between the two... I guess that depends on which stands a better chance of going to the looney bin as other votes come in.

If I'm right on both or either of them, that amounts to half the scum team. Will still be looking at others between now and Monday night.
Click to expand...
C'mon you can do it...vote for me. If DD ends up getting more votes you can always retract ;) Isn't that what scum would do anyway?
 
allaboutfish said:
well that night sucked. i hate that people UD even though sometimes its hard to not UD, but if you UD every game you really shouldnt play at all vote a when you know you have time. anyway, we really need to root out scum tonight, and looking at the low posters really isnt gonna help.
Click to expand...
You think the scum are posting now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom