Mafia 104 - Dawg the Bounty Hunter - The Play

My vote is staying with AAF right now. If I had been around to answer I would have said exactly what pap did and I think AAF was really trying to sidestep pap's questioning which makes me even more suspicious. Your thoughts about kash have me intrigued though and I'm gonna go back and look into that.

The reason I quoted this is because rich here hit the nail on the head with me. Every time I've made an off handed comment and was torn up for it because one person found it scummy I was found innocent. AAF should also have picked up on that by now so I'm wondering about his motives. I'll admit it's still possible he's an innocent that didn't like what I said but, as of right now, I'm not taking that chance. Especially when after I posted that he said something about not even offering his thoughts on anything that stood out to him because it could bite him in the butt.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Neph, believe me, I didn't like how you made it a WIFOM situation either. For you to say "that's too obvious" means nothing to me because you could just as easily be scum hoping we would agree.

And now your new defense is that every other time you've been questioned you've also been innocent? You've played what, two games? That's a horrendous sample size. Each game is different and each game you get different roles. So to again imply you are innocent because of a fault in your logic makes me more suspicious of you than before.
 
now about that cape...
 
Just got home and skimmed up to this point. I gotta take the dogs for a walk or I am going to kill them. I will try to get back and post some thoughts before nightfall, but I'm comfortable with my vote on Neph still.
 
out of all that's been said today, I have to say the one that peaked my interest most aside from anyone else is Rich. Call me out of practice with being in the game, something is just not sitting right with me and I need to follow up with singling out his posts.

Another thought that comes to mind is FF and Kash pointing out how well composed his posts have been. While I agree that FF is playing a fine game, is well composed, and did indeed shock me with such a well thought out list early in the game, I can't hrlp but wonder why Kash is so dead set on what appears to be trying to convince everyone that he must go. I get people having thoughts and trying to explain them, but it seems like overkill. Yes, I voted FF night one but that was as said, random at best....

Still not settled on the whole Bally thing with making a post elsewhere and then posting it in the game thread. I don't understand the reasoning for anyone doing that, regardless of anyone's excuses.

going to see what is bothering me about rich...

This is the one that is bothering me I guess. I guess the issue rich is on Kash for pushing Pir and mayve it's by this post that rich is not bothering me but what he said about Kash that makes sense. Yes, she is doing sort of the same with FF but the difference is it is Day 2 and there is a lot to be learned. On Day 1, Kash looked just like she was doing her thing, the thing she usually does. And that is pushing for answers, posting her thoughts, seeing if anyone else can see what she does. Pir could have been her only suspect, who knows. But now it is Day 2 and dynamics run differently. What I mean is that there is a lot more to take in, I guess I am just surprised that Kash is not making everyone their own thoughtful and pointing fingers type of post, which is what I was used to with Kash.... and is instead zero-ing in on FF. Yes, FF seems to be more comprehensive but I am not familiar with his maturity level as far as mafia's go.

for now, I vote to lynch Kash

sorry rich, it wasnt that you did anything wrong, you just peaked my interest.... my assumption was that something wasn't right but it wasn't with what you said in your error, it was in something you said that peaked my interest.

could that be because you have nothing rb?




I am not dodging anything. I have said it already that I thought I had an issue with rich's posts. I posted the one post that caught my attention because there wasn't any other that did of rich's. When I read it again, I found that it wasn't that I actually suspected him but found that something he said had me suspicious and I pointed that out and explained it.


so rich is the issue and you vote kash? as rich has..???
 
Votes so far:

2 - FF - Dun (234), RB (354)
1 - Rich - FF (248)
1 - Dun - Zaffy (253), JPap (357)
3 - Neph - Lab (311), Wiz (327), AAF (385)
2 - Zaffy - JB (333), Kash (346)
1 - JB - Chill (337)
2 - Kash - Rich (353), Doll (384)
1 - Doll - Zaffy (389)
1 - AAF - Neph (395)

1/2hr till nightfall

No votes from: Bally
 
could that be because you have nothing rb?

I am not dodging anything. I have said it already that I thought I had an issue with rich's posts. I posted the one post that caught my attention because there wasn't any other that did of rich's. When I read it again, I found that it wasn't that I actually suspected him but found that something he said had me suspicious and I pointed that out and explained it.

The problem I have is that you tend to be a more thorough player DD. Maybe not long winded, but not as careless as to say that you had an issue with Rich's post and then turn around and say that you actually agreed with him. And then to use his post to end up at a conclusion you previously posted? Too weird for me to be comfortable with...

you are not getting my vote right now. i don't suspect you. the first mention had suspicion slightly, but the others were compliments. rest assured, JP.

I never thought you would because to do so with such little to vote for would put you in a bad situation. I may just be paranoid, but I still don't trust what you're saying.
 
so rich is the issue and you vote kash? as rich has..???


that's right. Rich stuck out to me for a reason and I initially assumed it was because I suspected him for something. Turned out I didnt but instead was peaked by something he said. How many times are you going to ask me the same thing but with different words.

Nice job pulling posts, so I see that you do know that concept of the game owever, I still fail to see anything with who you suspect besides me. Surely I can't be your only suspect.
 
Would you be happier if I let my vote slip so the scum get a double vote?
I must have missed this...

My point was I find it odd that people seem to be more worried than usual about getting a vote in by specifically labeling them as "placeholder" votes...in a game where you don't UD the first time you don't vote.
 
AquariaCentral.com