Neph, believe me, I didn't like how you made it a WIFOM situation either. For you to say "that's too obvious" means nothing to me because you could just as easily be scum hoping we would agree.My vote is staying with AAF right now. If I had been around to answer I would have said exactly what pap did and I think AAF was really trying to sidestep pap's questioning which makes me even more suspicious. Your thoughts about kash have me intrigued though and I'm gonna go back and look into that.
The reason I quoted this is because rich here hit the nail on the head with me. Every time I've made an off handed comment and was torn up for it because one person found it scummy I was found innocent. AAF should also have picked up on that by now so I'm wondering about his motives. I'll admit it's still possible he's an innocent that didn't like what I said but, as of right now, I'm not taking that chance. Especially when after I posted that he said something about not even offering his thoughts on anything that stood out to him because it could bite him in the butt.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
And now your new defense is that every other time you've been questioned you've also been innocent? You've played what, two games? That's a horrendous sample size. Each game is different and each game you get different roles. So to again imply you are innocent because of a fault in your logic makes me more suspicious of you than before.