Sure, Neph put words into my mouth technically, but they weren't the incorrect words. I asked AAF if he knew FF would vote him ie. if they were teammates. That's why I don't understand your suspicion.
Mafia 106: Pokemafia
- Thread starter Piranha86
- Start date
Sure, Neph put words into my mouth technically, but they weren't the incorrect words. I asked AAF if he knew FF would vote him ie. if they were teammates. That's why I don't understand your suspicion.
I don't even know how to respond to this... well, actually, I'll try this: Are you kidding with me? That entire post and you have nothing to say except in defending yourself and your choices? No comments on my thoughts about others? Not even an attempt at using google or the links I provided to confirm/deny my thoughts? Did I perchance say something dangerous to you?
Just in terms of AAF being apparently an easy target for scum - I notice a couple of other posts referencing this which I'll deal with below. I have never played with AAF and have no idea what his/her form is or was. I took them at face value and acted accordingly - to be fair I did also ask for people to say what their experience playing the game is. This was in order to give some context to what might amount to newbie/inexperienced mistakes.
I'll respond as its a direct question on your part. I took it to mean that you were for some reason highlighting what you took as 'joke' votes versus 'serious' votes hence my engaging with your post. I actually think that this is self-evident by the way.
Anyway, your reason for doing so (highlighting my vote as 'first serious vote' is your own and I don't know why you'd do that. My observation now is that a 'joke' vote counts no more or no less than a 'serious' vote, and I'm content with the basis on which I picked my D1 vote, although I'm certainly disappointed that we lynched an innocent.
The first part of this vote - I have no idea what AAF's previous form is as I've never played with them. I didn't select them for my vote for any reason other than what I gave.
Metric. I get that you are new. I would respond in similar terms as others have which is that while there is a logic to this observation, it is ultimately very circular. Do the scum think 'we definitely shouldn't do that it would expose x - dawg in this instancce' or do they think 'this is the last thing they would suspect. lets do that !'. Its impossible to say which is more likely at this stage of the game so I would not place to much weight in it for now. I'm not trying to shut you down but that is my thought currently.
This is another instance of circular logic being deployed, but it is interesting that dawg is deploying it on his own behalf. 'I'd never be so stupid to do that if I was scum' just rarely sounds impressive.
I have really very little clue about pokemon and therefore have no idea whether your analysis is any way good or bad.
Just saying, again, I've never played with AAF. You are quite repetitive on this point though. I also must say that in my experience - which is not very current - your 9 out of 10 statistic is not at all borne out - but I have not played recently. I would point out that if your take on this is correct, and there was a scum (me presumably) up against an innocent, the scum team would be much more likely to leave things on a tie rather than send jpappy into action to break it.
OK those are my thoughts on some of the developments but if I've missed something which I should address feel free to throw it back at me. As regards people who I deem worthy of suspicion I would prefer to reflect on the thread a little more before finalising my current thoughts. It will be probably tomorrow for me before I get around to that (its coming on for midnight here).
'Kay see what I did was throw out a question to Neph and give a bit of feedback on my thought processes during the day. Its what you do when you want to win for the town.
I think we can do this all day. It is likely that a scum was on both lead vote getters. I am trying to figure if scum would be the kill vote on day one. I could see Pap risking it.
I guess we have decided to ignore FF's message? I know nothing about the game, only vaguely remember when it was popular.
I guess we have decided to ignore FF's message? I know nothing about the game, only vaguely remember when it was popular.
I was wondering about that too. First off the line about not confirming or denying made me wonder if he was supposed to post it but as far as the actual msg goes I like his interpretation so far. It feels like it's a bit complicated though so I'm not sure if it's correct because I'm not sure that we could all be expected to come to that conclusion.
But the drunk part I think is important, the part about whose pet it was I'm not so sure about since I don't know if we could he expected to track it that far. Maybe its speech has something to do with it? Most pokemon just talk in varying octaves emphases of their name but maybe there's something to the name.
But if it is widely known or visible on bulbapedia that it was a team rocket pet then maybe it really is that simple
Anyone care to expand on this?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 using the MAN app!
But the drunk part I think is important, the part about whose pet it was I'm not so sure about since I don't know if we could he expected to track it that far. Maybe its speech has something to do with it? Most pokemon just talk in varying octaves emphases of their name but maybe there's something to the name.
But if it is widely known or visible on bulbapedia that it was a team rocket pet then maybe it really is that simple
Anyone care to expand on this?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 using the MAN app!
No way should it be ignored. The rules say something would be given on the first day. FF claimed to have gotten it, and no one has contradicted him. You have to proceed on the basis that that was a genuine claim. That being so, it does not appear to have been either a hit or a protect, therefore it was a clue.
I think FF has done a solid job in posting up their analysis and giving links to substantiate it.
I have clicked the links in an effort to engage with the analysis but I have to confess that I'm lost and I don't think I'm going to be able to educate myself on pokemon sufficiently to make an informed judgment on whether its right or wrong.
Well, the long and short of the links is that Victreebel's only major showing in the show was as James' Pokemon, and that Delibirds aren't (I think) usually that clumsy. I admit, I didn't understand the hint at first (even asked if this meant I got to use my new Victreebel to eat someone lol), but after doing about 5 minutes of reading on the various pokemon in question, that is what I came up with.
I don't really know how to clarify the subject any more then this, and do hope you try to understand the links (only the first two megasections are needed). If you don't understand pokemon or try to, you won't be able to understand any hints you may be given.
I don't really know how to clarify the subject any more then this, and do hope you try to understand the links (only the first two megasections are needed). If you don't understand pokemon or try to, you won't be able to understand any hints you may be given.
As much as it pained me to read these pokemon links I think FF may have something here. The delibird is part of Team Rocket (scum) who gives presents to his opponents as its power. The present was given to FF by an apparently drunk delibird. The present was a victreebel which was owned by James. I think this clue points directly at Coler who was talking about being drunk early in the thread.
I won't be around for most of the day tomorrow so...I vote to lynch Coler
The clue breaks the tie I have right now between JPap and Coler. I tend to agree with FF on the interpretation after reading up on the links. I'll be around for a bit more tonight. I'll also try to check in before I head out tomorrow but no guarantees. Either way I will be back on before nightfall in case something else comes up.
The clue breaks the tie I have right now between JPap and Coler. I tend to agree with FF on the interpretation after reading up on the links. I'll be around for a bit more tonight. I'll also try to check in before I head out tomorrow but no guarantees. Either way I will be back on before nightfall in case something else comes up.
