A Terrorist - Nonetheless...

The odds of one kook, acting alone, obtaining a nuclear weapon? sorry, not even feasible.

Terrorism occurs on many levels. Should everything be a media play ground? No. Does 'offending muslims' prevent major news stories? Not last time I checked--on any given day, there are a number of stories that portray 'them' negatively. To lump ALL Muslims together with extremists is inaccurate, and rude--much as lumping all Christains together with Crusaders.
 
125gJoe said:
Ok.....

How many does it take to wipe out a 'city near you' -- ?

One truck, or two ?

This IS Terrorism.. And, the Muslim took 2 years to "think about it" ...

Do you get the scenario?




_________________
I get the scenario- disturbed young man things that running over people will punish the US government. I think maybe 5 other people in the United States may agree with him.

What do you want to do about it? Put every young Muslim man in a consentration camp so they can't perform out terrorist acts? Discrimination will increase the attacks, not decrease them.

I think that he wanted the press. And I'm glad he's not getting all that much of it.
 
125gJoe said:
WHAT?

Sorry---
But What did you just say??

One Muslin setting off a Nuke would not be a Terrorist Attack in your thinking?

Did you even read the article?

The WHOLE Reason this story is not told, is due to Political Correctness(period) -- Don't offend a Muslim...

Now had this Muslim killed --say a couple thousand-- then the NEWS Media might cover it..


Go figure.

:help: US ALL . . .



________________


ONE muslum working alone would have a pretty hard time getting hold of a nuclear weapon of any kind Joe.

I hear what your saying though, but I still agree with the definition and the reasons for being so "fussy" about who and what gets labeled as terrorist activity. I don't think the gov is trying to get away with anything here except to prevent itself from getting all tangled up in prosecuting individual loser/nutcases that are just out to get a little attention for themselves. And that's all this individual is....a sorry little man with a low opinion of himself, trying to be a big man with someone...even if only a few low life terrorists.
 
edited..
doesn't matter..

_____________________
 
Last edited:
edited...

________________
 
Last edited:
...
_____________________
 
Last edited:
125gJoe said:
If it wasn't an SUV...
Then a bomb in a theater would "qualify"???

Ooops -- I'm trying to stay Politically Correct, but it doesn't 'work'... Not in Real Life.

_____________________
Fact is that if he was white and did it to attack the US government, you wouldn't have made a thread about it.
 
"During the 911 call, Taheri-azar told an emergency dispatcher he wanted to “punish the government of the United States for their actions around the world,” according to a recording released by police. Authorities have said Taheri-azar later told investigators he intentionally hit people to “avenge the deaths of Muslims around the world.” " That right there to me classifies it as a terrorist act in my book!
 
It only takes ONE muslim to kill thousands. How can you defend a terrorsit act?

What university allows acts of Terrorism??



*sigh*

I had planned and actually written up a few paragraphs to answer that Joe, but I think *sigh* is good enough.
sad0133.gif
 
AquariaCentral.com