Roan Art said:
Would you cite your source for this, please? This is something that I've certainly not heard of and I've done a fair amount of research on this. Thanks!
I was on my way out the door earlier, so I didn't search everything out on that last post. Apologies for any confusion.
For the bit about Amquel
not converting ammonia to ammonium, also at Novalek's
site:
…The active ingredient in AmQuel is known chemically as sodium hydroxymethanesulfonate, HOCH2SO3Na.…
The hydroxymethane- end of the molecule reacts with ammonia to form a non-toxic, stable water-soluble substance which is acted upon by the bacteria in biological filtration.
…
…
The -sulfonate end of the AmQuel molecule reacts with both free-available chlorine, known properly as hypochlorites (OCl-) and combined-available chlorine (chloramines). In the first instance nothing more than harmless chloride ions (Cl- ) are produced, and in the latter instance chloride ions are formed and the freed ammonia instantly reacts with the hydroxy-methane end of the molecule.
It turns ammonia into aminomethanesulfonate, doesn't use sodium thiosulfate.
The bit about sodium thiosulfate and false positives was cited above (in the quote) as being from the
SkepticalAquarist. (Scroll down to "Ammonia Tests"; third paragraph).
He cites Seachem's website as his source, but if whatever he read is still up at Seachem, I can't find it.
The SkepticalAquarist used to post here as WetmanNY, although I haven't seen him posting anywhere for some time. I'd put him roughly on par with RTR and consider his info reliable and well-researched.
EDIT: :OT: I searched around a bit for the Wetfeller and found this old
thread which may be of interest to anyone in a fishless cycle frame of mind.