If you're a scientist fresh_newby, you should know that what you are seeing is the way science has been for the past few centuries. There's a generally accepted idea, then evidence comes along to challenge these ideas. Some people accept the new theories, many people reject them, and you get lots of back and forth arguments, even childish behavior and name calling among big names and seasoned professionals.

This goes on to this day. It's part of the scientific process and how new discoveries are made.
In this case, I would put myself in the "new" crowd djlin. The way this all came about is with users of ADA Aqua Soil, a semi-fired clay with strong negative physio electric charges. It has quite a strong effect on lowering GH and KH. Most users of Aqua Soil setting up ADA style tanks don't bother to test, they just use the Aqua Soil, get great results with healthy and happy plants and fish, and that's it. But some people knew that they already had tap water with a low KH. So they tested their KH to see what it was, and lo and behold, the test kits immediately showed the "end" color on the first drop - 0 KH!
It turns out that these extremely low KH as well as GH levels are typical in tanks maintained by Amano/ADA - they publish these specs in their catalogs and in Aqua Journal. And we all know how successful these tanks are.
We also know that many areas of the Amazon where plants and fish thrive also have very low (sometimes undetectable) KH and GH.
So what's going on? The old idea was that without buffering, the pH would crash and that would kill the fish. Why is that not happening?
Well, water with a low KH means that you will see a faster and sharper pH swing when acids or bases are added. That means if you put too much CO2 into the tank, you will see a very low pH.
But is it the low pH that is killing the fish, or is it too high a level of CO2 and/or a combination of too little dissolved oxygen?
After a lot of testing and reporting among many hobbyists, the latter seems to be the theory that is likely to be the correct one.
Again fresh_newby, for a very long time the accepted notion was to keep the KH at a minimum of 3. When you are presenting new evidence to challenge long held ideas, you are going to get resistance, and it is going to take a lot of time, energy, explanation, debate, and evidence to get the new ideas into general acceptance.
djlin, I encourage you to keep and open mind and if you can do some of your own experimenting and investigation to test these new ideas so you can properly rethink your stance and better support it.