just a reminder. you can't prove evolution right with science. and you can't prove creation right either. you can prove nothin with science unless you disprove all contradicting ideas. this is far from done. so all we can do is argue. :argue:
The Earth orbiting the Sun also conflicts with scripture. Galileo followed Copernicus and dared say otherwise. Got him placed under house arrest. Only took 400 years to get an apology for that one.pophead said:yes, he is a very typical evolutionist. claiming no conflicts between the Bible and theistic evolution. but look at Genesis, it does say DAY, not years.
It also says "with the Lord, a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day". Much of the Bible describes things non-literally for a variety of reasons. It is entirely possible that Genesis is no exception.pophead said:yes, he is a very typical evolutionist. claiming no conflicts between the Bible and theistic evolution. but look at Genesis, it does say DAY, not years.
the earth orbiting the sun conflicts with scripture?! news to me! please tell me more.mogurnda said:The Earth orbiting the Sun also conflicts with scripture. Galileo followed Copernicus and dared say otherwise. Got him placed under house arrest. Only took 400 years to get an apology for that one.
many men(and probably women too) have studied how each book of the Bible is written. many are written non-literally but the first chapter is written literally. I'm not a Bible scholar myself but I know and have known lots.cgrabe said:It also says "with the Lord, a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day". Much of the Bible describes things non-literally for a variety of reasons. It is entirely possible that Genesis is no exception.
Psalms 92 "He has made the world firm, not to be moved"pophead said:the earth orbiting the sun conflicts with scripture?! news to me! please tell me more.
So do you mean to imply we have uncovered all the secrets and understand the full meaning of every verse in the Bible? Do you believe those scholars to be infallible? It is essentially a given that we do not understand everything and have mistaken some things; we should be open to determing what those things might be so that we can better our understanding of our own religion.pophead said:many men(and probably women too) have studied how each book of the Bible is written. many are written non-literally but the first chapter is written literally. I'm not a Bible scholar myself but I know and have known lots.
...mogurnda said:.. In addition to Galileo being an arrogant jerk, even though he was right.