I am a noob to fish keeping as well as reptiles and amphibians as many of you have probably come to realise. I will state my opinion because I am 17 and believe that our country needs its people to speak up even if its over a small issue because more and more I notice that we are becoming less and less of a democracy everyday.
I voted cruel on the basis that most bowls don't have filters and thus are not safe for fish. I know that whales are mammals but this priniciple still applies. An animal that is obviously deformed (fin curl) because of it inability to exercise properly, how cruel is that, yes it may be healthy but wouldn't it be happier in a bigger tank? Or how about the elephant at the local zoo that rocks back and forth from boredom?
I do not dispute Alans statement that everyone is entitled to their opinion I applaud that thinking, but thoughts are not fact either and I won't claim mine to be, as neither did he.
I believe that fish do have a primitive system of emotion, That they are capable of thought even if its not at a level that is understandable to us. Therfore I disagree with his statement but would otherwise like to comend him for speaking his mind and explaining his thoughts.
I challenge his statement of not all animals having emotions based of the fact that fish can become acclimated to the person that feeds them but when another person feeds them they will be more shy, this begs the question of is a learned trait connected to emotion?. Also some schooling fish sometimes won't accept a fish of their same kind why is that? They can be perfectly healthy and still not be accepted. Why is that?
I don't think that unless you ask the god(s) of (insert belife here) or drop a bunch of acid you will ever know the answer to this question. Therefore I provide my animals with as close to their natural habitat as possible and only house them in enclosures I think I, as an emotional beign, would enjoy.
Well, its late I have bronchitis and an ear infection, I hope this made sense and I hope that I didn't offend anyone but If I did I appologize for nothing, after all its just my opinion.
I don't feel that you should apologize for you opinion nor do I think anyone else should. To answer your question I don't think that memory of a food source shows emotion. In your example you used an elephant. Elephant are very intellegent creatures and have been proven to have emotion. Its obvious they do imo. They experience love fear sadness etc. Although I don't deny that some fish are more intellegent than others like oscars for example. I have never seen any evidence of emotion or even a sense of pain in fish. If fish felt pain wouldn't fishing be out lawed? What do you think would happen legally if you snagged a dog in the lip with a sharp barbed hooked? Not proof of my point I know but only an example.