But the morality is the same. It is the perceived facts that differ (ie whether or not souls are reincarnated as animals). The morality involves eating relatives. It is not a moral judgment that cows are reanimated souls. It is a moral judgment that we should/should not eat our loved ones.
Ok...so if the cow IS a reincarnated reletive...then it would be wrong to eat it I suppose........but..............ISSSSSSSSSS the cow a reincarnated reletive ??
If it's true that the cow is indeed your old Uncle Goober, than it would indeed be morally wrong to eat it.......
But if it ISN"T your old Uncle....and it's just a cow.......born to eat grass and end up on a plate........than there's nothing wrong with eating it...unless of course you are a vegan and such things are abhorant to you....or, you just like cows and can't stand the thought of eating one. But that wouldn't mean that it would be morally wrong for someone else to eat it............(*GAAAAAA!!*)..... head....hurts.....must.....find......aspirin..........quickly.....before...it......melts.....away......
Guess what I'm trying to get at is.........get down through all the muck and garbage that we add to an issue, through our own flawed opinions about a given moral issue....because opinions are not always based on fact and truth...sometimes a person has an opinion about something just because someone else says it's so......not necessarily because they've looked into the issue or not.................anyway, waaaaaaayyyyyyy down deep underneath the pile we create with our own opinions and beliefs.....is the TRUTH......and THAT's where you find what REALLY is.....and that's where you find God..."seek and ye shall find"

Last edited: