Mafia 101 - Blarney Castle: Return of the Leprechauns - Game Thread
- Thread starter Lab_Rat
- Start date
wow really good knews. i dont think ive ever played a game where scum got taken out on the first day, even if it was a UD. sorry to see you go red and go doctor!!!
![[AC] Old3Toes](/forums/data/avatars/s/83/83908.jpg?1431345518){kind=avatar}
Lab, I have some questions regarding the Bartender role.
1) If the beer is given to a normal innocent is that when the "kill" happens?
2) Does the bartender count towards the innocents or are they neutral until otherwise?
[AC] Old3Toes;2762116 said:
1.) Yes, if the bartender gives the beer to an innocent townie, the townie dies. If given to an evil or a townie PR, no townie death will occur. I realize that it reads a little awkward but that is my take on it.
2.) The bartender counts as an innocent.
If the green beer goes to a PR the bartender basically joins that team. If given to an innocent townie the townie dies. This game was made from the original Christmas game and the Bartender is equal to the Rudolph PR I believe it is. Bartender counts for the Townies unless their beer goes to one of the Leps.
I read through the thread again and really not a whole lot to go on. LG did vote for Chill which is a good sign. Although it doesn't clear her because there is a lone Lep out there I'd say she will drop down on my list for now.
I'm also wondering about AAF and the people who pushed for votes there. Not sure which side of the argument I would fall on in that one. Meaning whether scum were pushing to get AAF lynched or if there was something more to those votes. I actually saw it at the time that AAF was typing while Fozzy posted but others saw it differently I guess. I did make a joke in that direction though.
I'm also wondering about AAF and the people who pushed for votes there. Not sure which side of the argument I would fall on in that one. Meaning whether scum were pushing to get AAF lynched or if there was something more to those votes. I actually saw it at the time that AAF was typing while Fozzy posted but others saw it differently I guess. I did make a joke in that direction though.
I can't stay very long right now but I have at least some questions for just about everyone. So I'll just put these out there and check back later today.
=====
AAF -- This should be fairly straight-forward. When did you decide to place your random vote on Dawg? BEFORE looking at thread? You already intended to vote whoever the person was that just happened to make the latest post you saw and then saw it was Dawg so you voted him? Or.... AFTER looking at the thread? Seeing Dawg had made the last post (missing the Fozzy post), you then decided to pick Dawg for a random or arbitrary D1 vote at that time?
=====
Dawg -- When you retracted your Fozzy vote to vote Red, thus creating a tie between AAF and Red.... Chill was the only one who had not voted yet. You said you wanted to see if someone might switch or find out which way Chill would vote. At that time, what did you think was most likely from Chill.... that he would break the tie.... or that he would vote someone other than AAF or Red?
=====
Driver -- You made 2 game related posts that I saw. First to vote Lady G because it was a rainy afternoon. Then to comment that AAF seemed a bit sensitive in his response to the many posts from O3T. You chose the word "sensitive" and not "defensive" for how you phrased that. And you didn't seem to feel anything strongly enough to vote AAF -- you left your Lady G vote in place.
As you read nightfall events, were you hoping the coin flip would kill AAF or Red? Did you lean either of them as more scummy than the other? Was your vote on Lady G a joke vote or a random vote? Who other than Lady G were you considering for your vote (if anyone)?
=====
Fozzy -- How random was your vote on AAF? Originally, you voted him based on his exchange with Zaffy about the video (being dickish). Was that a serious vote or a joke/random vote?
Later when OT3 made several posts that they did not believe AAF's vote on Dawg was random at all....... you were the only one who seemed to understand AAF's side of it. You explained that you could easily see that AAF might have missed your post and really thought Dawg's post was the latest one in the thread when AAF posted his vote (3 minutes after your post).
And, since you actually posted that... did you wonder at all whether you should move your vote off of AAF?
I have to ask because it seems odd that someone would leave their vote on a person...... but then be the only one to defend them in some way to another player who ALSO went on to vote them.
=====
Hi IQ -- You voted Red for making a big deal about Zaffy making a big deal about AAF posting a non-Irish-drinking-song video. Was that a joke... you did that because you were trying to be funny? Or did you think Red really seemed scummy at the time?
=====
O3T -- I'm having a little trouble trying to "read" you. Blasted alias names! lmao.
First, you said Red's vote on Zaffy looked like first "serious" vote of the game. How serious were you about that specific statement at the time? Was that an actual comment or were you being sarcastic? (Red voted Zaffy because Zaffy voted AAF for posting a non-Irish-drinking video.)
(For the rest of these questions, keep in mind that I do NOT want to know who you are. When you answer this, please make sure you do NOT make it some kind of a clue about your actual identity. As I said, it's hard for me to read you because I don't know what your usual style is.)
Your many posts about AAF and your vote on him suggests two possibilities -- that you are generally an aggressive/inquisitive player who believed it was worthwhile to keep poking at him, I guess, to gauge his reaction.... OR.... that you held some actual conviction in your belief that AAF is evil.
Which is it? Were you just messing with him or did you (do you) actually think AAF is scum?
And finally, this: You seemed pretty sure that AAF is evil based on how you focused on him over his random or no-random vote on Dawg. That being the case, why so narrowly focused on only that single random vote when there were several other random (or self-proclaimed random) Day 1 votes that you didn't comment about in any way?
Do you intend to vote AAF again today or do you have other possible suspects in mind?
=====
Wizard -- You voted O3T because dinosaurs died out long ago. Was that a random vote or a joke vote?
=====
At the moment, I don't have any questions for JB, Lady G, or Zaffy yet. I went through real quick to re-read their posts but didn't see anything to question them about so far. All 3 players usually post a lot more content than they have (regardless of their role) and it was a very slow day. Just need to wait until they get more involved, I guess.
=====
AAF -- This should be fairly straight-forward. When did you decide to place your random vote on Dawg? BEFORE looking at thread? You already intended to vote whoever the person was that just happened to make the latest post you saw and then saw it was Dawg so you voted him? Or.... AFTER looking at the thread? Seeing Dawg had made the last post (missing the Fozzy post), you then decided to pick Dawg for a random or arbitrary D1 vote at that time?
=====
Dawg -- When you retracted your Fozzy vote to vote Red, thus creating a tie between AAF and Red.... Chill was the only one who had not voted yet. You said you wanted to see if someone might switch or find out which way Chill would vote. At that time, what did you think was most likely from Chill.... that he would break the tie.... or that he would vote someone other than AAF or Red?
=====
Driver -- You made 2 game related posts that I saw. First to vote Lady G because it was a rainy afternoon. Then to comment that AAF seemed a bit sensitive in his response to the many posts from O3T. You chose the word "sensitive" and not "defensive" for how you phrased that. And you didn't seem to feel anything strongly enough to vote AAF -- you left your Lady G vote in place.
As you read nightfall events, were you hoping the coin flip would kill AAF or Red? Did you lean either of them as more scummy than the other? Was your vote on Lady G a joke vote or a random vote? Who other than Lady G were you considering for your vote (if anyone)?
=====
Fozzy -- How random was your vote on AAF? Originally, you voted him based on his exchange with Zaffy about the video (being dickish). Was that a serious vote or a joke/random vote?
Later when OT3 made several posts that they did not believe AAF's vote on Dawg was random at all....... you were the only one who seemed to understand AAF's side of it. You explained that you could easily see that AAF might have missed your post and really thought Dawg's post was the latest one in the thread when AAF posted his vote (3 minutes after your post).
And, since you actually posted that... did you wonder at all whether you should move your vote off of AAF?
I have to ask because it seems odd that someone would leave their vote on a person...... but then be the only one to defend them in some way to another player who ALSO went on to vote them.
=====
Hi IQ -- You voted Red for making a big deal about Zaffy making a big deal about AAF posting a non-Irish-drinking-song video. Was that a joke... you did that because you were trying to be funny? Or did you think Red really seemed scummy at the time?
=====
O3T -- I'm having a little trouble trying to "read" you. Blasted alias names! lmao.
First, you said Red's vote on Zaffy looked like first "serious" vote of the game. How serious were you about that specific statement at the time? Was that an actual comment or were you being sarcastic? (Red voted Zaffy because Zaffy voted AAF for posting a non-Irish-drinking video.)
(For the rest of these questions, keep in mind that I do NOT want to know who you are. When you answer this, please make sure you do NOT make it some kind of a clue about your actual identity. As I said, it's hard for me to read you because I don't know what your usual style is.)
Your many posts about AAF and your vote on him suggests two possibilities -- that you are generally an aggressive/inquisitive player who believed it was worthwhile to keep poking at him, I guess, to gauge his reaction.... OR.... that you held some actual conviction in your belief that AAF is evil.
Which is it? Were you just messing with him or did you (do you) actually think AAF is scum?
And finally, this: You seemed pretty sure that AAF is evil based on how you focused on him over his random or no-random vote on Dawg. That being the case, why so narrowly focused on only that single random vote when there were several other random (or self-proclaimed random) Day 1 votes that you didn't comment about in any way?
Do you intend to vote AAF again today or do you have other possible suspects in mind?
=====
Wizard -- You voted O3T because dinosaurs died out long ago. Was that a random vote or a joke vote?
=====
At the moment, I don't have any questions for JB, Lady G, or Zaffy yet. I went through real quick to re-read their posts but didn't see anything to question them about so far. All 3 players usually post a lot more content than they have (regardless of their role) and it was a very slow day. Just need to wait until they get more involved, I guess.
I wondered that too when I re-read her posts but came to a completely different conclusion. To me, it's more of a wash.
Lady G and Chill are good friends who quite often vote each other right off the bat in a lot of games. Kind of an "unless I've got somewhere to vote for real, I'll default to Lady G/Chill" kind of a thing.
Pappy tends to do the same thing defaulting his Day 1 vote to Dangerdoll just the same way.
That being the case, doesn't that make Lady G's vote on Chill inconsequential?
