Mafia 104 - Dawg the Bounty Hunter - The Play

[jpappy789]

random. i did eenie meanie minnie mow duh!

So you used a random number generator or...?

 

[allaboutfish]

let me make this clearer
I USED EENIE MEENIE MINNIE MOW USING THE FIRST POSTED LIST MY DAWG.
YOU KNOW EENIE MEENIE MINNIE MOW CATCH A TIGER BY ITS TOE IF IT HOLLERS LET IT GO MY MOTHER TOLD ME TO PICK THIS ONE RIGHT OVER HERE.

 

[Rbishop]

Must be a TN thing..never heard it like that...

 

[jpappy789]

LOL sheesh AAF...

 

[allaboutfish]

well i said it twice!! haha.

 

[allaboutfish]

Must be a TN thing..never heard it like that...

how do yall say it?

 

[Rbishop]

not printable here at AC..

 

[Zaffy]

Kind of a stretch, especially before the first nightfall.

I retract my vote to lynch rb and vote to lynch zaffy

Is my reason really worse than others?

 

[Chill]

Any reasons for why Pir and Zaf are unsettling?

I get the feeling both were trying to make something out of nothing. Zaf voting Rich for a non-random random vote and Pir and his 'sarcasm'. I could be out to lunch but nothing else is jumping out at me yet.

 

[Lab_Rat]

"What he answered was what I thought he meant, I was just wondering."

Pir, your answer "sounds good" but I don't believe you.

I think you were either trying to make Neph seem suspicious to us or maybe prod him into a flustered response you or others might find suspicious... or possibly just asking a question you didn't really question just pretending to appear helpful.

If you honestly wondered what Neph meant or if Neph wanted to hide behind chaos, I think you would have asked him to clarify his original statement in the context he made it.

Here is Neph's original post.




The "that'll probably change" part referred to his vote.

The last 3 sentences were talking about this particular game. And I think when we read all 3 statements together, Neph's meaning was clear.

The thing is, when you asked Neph to clarify, you didn't include the full content in your quote.

Why did you prune Neph's remarks from this:

"This is an interesting game. A lot to keep track of. I like complications."

To just this:

"I like complications."

Maybe it's just me, but that doesn't look like an innocent question, even though that's what you say it was.

I find Kash's thoughts here quite interesting. It does seem Pir was cherry picking from Neph's posts to make him look scummy.

I won't be here for nightfall so I'll have to vote somewhere.

I vote to lynch Lab Rat.

That is not a real vote, just a placeholder for now so I don't UD in case I can't get back on.

I should be on and off for short times until early afternoon-ish so I hope to check Pir's response if there is one and see what else may develop.

Aww, thanks. But why not put your placeholder on Pir after all the points you made about him in your post before? That doesn't make much sense, though if you were just thinking out loud and not ready to heavily pursue those thoughts I guess I could see not voting for him yet.

I guess it's a little harder to display sarcasm over the internet. It was a dull, joking response and I do not see why you

Pshh. Nobility? I'm royalty. I'm the overripe king of bel air, actually.

1.) It seems like you're predetermined to raise suspicion about me. I assume that if my answer didn't "look good", then you would also suspect me more, or at least post that you suspected me more. So why are you out to get me?
2.) I wasn't really trying to do that. It was an honest question, and maybe I asked it in a strange way. As a bit of a side note
3.) Well, you don't really know me and how I respond to things, so what you think I would have done is irrelevant.
4.) I understood the first two sentences perfectly well. The sentence in question wasn't necessarily (although, I now know that it was) related to the first two.
5.) Maybe it's just you, or maybe it's just me that thought it was a harmless question.

Again, predetermined to raise suspicion about me.

First of all, Dawg stated that the roles are random. I guess that doesn't help my case, but I thought I would point it out. Second, you choose to insult me.

Kash, it's clear that you have it out for me. If it is for personal reasons, and I understand why there could be some, I apologize wholeheartedly. If that is not the case, one could interpret it as you trying to rouse suspicion about me for a gameplay purpose, which would lead me to believe that you are scum, attempting to get me voted out. Or maybe, if you're really sneaky, you'll turn me and then get me voted out, and then become a hero because you got rid of scum. I see that as pretty unlikely, but hey, who knows?

Call it OMGUS, call it whatever, but I retract my previous vote from RBishop and vote to lynch Kashta.

My vote on RB was a D1 'joke' vote and a UD security vote, and since I have some reason to believe that Kashta is scum, or at least unnecessarily trying to rouse suspicion about me, it is more appropriate and game-oriented to place my vote on her.

This post sounds very defensive, way more defensive than any innocent need be on day 1. I didn't see anything personal towards you in Kash's post and I see nothing that indicates she has it out for you. Your defensiveness makes me think you have a guilty conscience.

Hopefully this won't make me look scummy, but can you go a little more in-depth about that? Since I apparently have to spell it out, could you explain how I upped the intensity of the conversation and why it makes you worried?

I agree with Pappy that your defensiveness and accusing her of being out to get you definitely ups the intensity.

i vote to lynch doll. bc ennie meanie minnie mow(or however you spell that).

Seriously, after Pir getting all defensive when Kash kicked bushes around him doesn't interest you at all? You truly feel a random vote is the best way to vote after today's posts?

I retract my vote on JB. I vote to lynch Pir. AAF also has my attention now.