Mafia 104 - Dawg the Bounty Hunter - The Play

Chill said:
This was sarcasm?
Click to expand...
I guess it's a little harder to display sarcasm over the internet. It was a dull, joking response and I do not see why you
Ballyhoo said:
I vote to lynch Pir for being a Will lacking in nobility.
Click to expand...
Pshh. Nobility? I'm royalty. I'm the overripe king of bel air, actually.
Kashta said:
"What he answered was what I thought he meant, I was just wondering."
1.)Pir, your answer "sounds good" but I don't believe you.
2.)I think you were either trying to make Neph seem suspicious to us or maybe prod him into a flustered response you or others might find suspicious... or possibly just asking a question you didn't really question just pretending to appear helpful.
3.)If you honestly wondered what Neph meant or if Neph wanted to hide behind chaos, I think you would have asked him to clarify his original statement in the context he made it.
4.)The thing is, when you asked Neph to clarify, you didn't include the full content in your quote.
Why did you prune Neph's remarks from this:
"This is an interesting game. A lot to keep track of. I like complications."
To just this:
"I like complications."
5.) Maybe it's just me, but that doesn't look like an innocent question, even though that's what you say it was.
Click to expand...
1.) It seems like you're predetermined to raise suspicion about me. I assume that if my answer didn't "look good", then you would also suspect me more, or at least post that you suspected me more. So why are you out to get me?
2.) I wasn't really trying to do that. It was an honest question, and maybe I asked it in a strange way. As a bit of a side note
3.) Well, you don't really know me and how I respond to things, so what you think I would have done is irrelevant.
4.) I understood the first two sentences perfectly well. The sentence in question wasn't necessarily (although, I now know that it was) related to the first two.
5.) Maybe it's just you, or maybe it's just me that thought it was a harmless question.
Kashta said:
I might vote him, I just wanted to think about it. There isn't much chance his reply is going to resolve anything either so it's where I'm inclined to vote if nothing else comes up.
Click to expand...
Again, predetermined to raise suspicion about me.
Kashta said:
My only reluctance is tending to look harder at vets in a team building format. For Pir to be scum, Dawg would have had to let the balance of this game rest on him in a critical role or someone would have to have chosen Pir as their first turn. I find both cases unlikely... but still possible I guess.
Click to expand...
First of all, Dawg stated that the roles are random. I guess that doesn't help my case, but I thought I would point it out. Second, you choose to insult me.

Kash, it's clear that you have it out for me. If it is for personal reasons, and I understand why there could be some, I apologize wholeheartedly. If that is not the case, one could interpret it as you trying to rouse suspicion about me for a gameplay purpose, which would lead me to believe that you are scum, attempting to get me voted out. Or maybe, if you're really sneaky, you'll turn me and then get me voted out, and then become a hero because you got rid of scum. I see that as pretty unlikely, but hey, who knows?

Call it OMGUS, call it whatever, but I retract my previous vote from RBishop and vote to lynch Kashta.

My vote on RB was a D1 'joke' vote and a UD security vote, and since I have some reason to believe that Kashta is scum, or at least unnecessarily trying to rouse suspicion about me, it is more appropriate and game-oriented to place my vote on her.
 
Kashta said:
I know Pappy. I did start typing up a vote on him too. And random is supposed to be random... and I believe they usually are. I just know as a game mod, I'd be hard pressed not to randomize the assignments a second time if the first run put a player in that role who UDs so often.

You are right though...

I retract my vote on Lab and vote to lynch Pir.

I don't believe what he said is true in response to my question. And I don't have anything more suspicious to go on. I also may not get back again before night. So this vote is unlikely to change.
Click to expand...
Didn't see this as I was typing my response. I find it curious that you argue with JPap as to why I am most likely not scum, and then vote for me.
 
1 - JPap - Chill (4)
1 - RB - Pir (46)
1 - JB - Lab (48)
2 - Pir - FF (53), Bally (101)
1 - Bally - Rich (78)
1 - Rich - Zaffy (82)
3 - Zaffy - Neph (98), Wiz (99), Chill (112)
1 - Neph - JB (100)
1 - FF - DD (105)
1 - Kashta - (114)

I think this is the current vote count. Just as a heads up, if I need to, I will switch my vote in order to keep myself in the game, even if it means voting someone who I do not believe to be scummier than anyone else in the game.
 
1 - JB - Lab (48)
2 - Pir - FF (53), Bally (101)
1 - Bally - Rich (78)
1 - Rich - Zaffy (82)
3 - Zaffy - Neph (98), Wiz (99), Chill (112)
1 - Neph - JB (100)
1 - FF - DD (105)
1 - Kashta - Pir (114)

Fixed, sorry.
 
Chill said:
Zaffy and Pir are unsettling me the most at the moment.

I vote to lynch Zaffy.

I may revisit this get back on between now and nightfall.
Click to expand...

Any reasons for why Pir and Zaf are unsettling?
 
I am with DD in her thoughts....

I vote to lynch FF1

A bigger dislike than mine on AAF....
 
Votes so far:

0 - JPap - Chill (4)
0 - RB - Pir (46), Neph (66)
1 - JB - Lab (48)
3 - Pir - FF (53), Bally (101), Kash (109)
1 - Bally - Rich (78)
1 - Rich - Zaffy (82)
3 - Zaffy - Neph (98), Wiz (99), Chill (112)
1 - Neph - JB (100)
0 - Lab - Kash (103)
2 - FF - Doll (105), RB (119)
1 - Kash - Pir (114)

Nightfall in just over 5 hours

No votes from: AAF, JPap, Dun
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom