Mafia 104 - Dawg the Bounty Hunter - The Play

[Dangerdoll]

That was quite an interesting route to get to your vote DD...from Rich peaking your interest to finding a post of Rich's about Kash going after Pir to saying Kash is pushing for FF?

just posting my thoughts...

 

[Dangerdoll]

it seems like I put a little fear in the boys, huh.

 

[jpappy789]

DD, I find it odd that Rich had anything to do with it seeing as your final conclusion was in your initial post all along...

out of all that's been said today, I have to say the one that peaked my interest most aside from anyone else is Rich. Call me out of practice with being in the game, something is just not sitting right with me and I need to follow up with singling out his posts.

Another thought that comes to mind is FF and Kash pointing out how well composed his posts have been. While I agree that FF is playing a fine game, is well composed, and did indeed shock me with such a well thought out list early in the game, I can't hrlp but wonder why Kash is so dead set on what appears to be trying to convince everyone that he must go. I get people having thoughts and trying to explain them, but it seems like overkill. Yes, I voted FF night one but that was as said, random at best....

Still not settled on the whole Bally thing with making a post elsewhere and then posting it in the game thread. I don't understand the reasoning for anyone doing that, regardless of anyone's excuses.

going to see what is bothering me about rich...

 

[Rbishop]

This is the one that is bothering me I guess. I guess the issue rich is on Kash for pushing Pir and mayve it's by this post that rich is not bothering me but what he said about Kash that makes sense. Yes, she is doing sort of the same with FF but the difference is it is Day 2 and there is a lot to be learned. On Day 1, Kash looked just like she was doing her thing, the thing she usually does. And that is pushing for answers, posting her thoughts, seeing if anyone else can see what she does. Pir could have been her only suspect, who knows. But now it is Day 2 and dynamics run differently. What I mean is that there is a lot more to take in, I guess I am just surprised that Kash is not making everyone their own thoughtful and pointing fingers type of post, which is what I was used to with Kash.... and is instead zero-ing in on FF. Yes, FF seems to be more comprehensive but I am not familiar with his maturity level as far as mafia's go.

for now, I vote to lynch Kash

DD..you posting like lbf-FF1 or AAF now....a big ramble covering the whole game....and talking a fair amount of nothing solid...

 

[Nepherael]

can only pop in for a sec. i had to go to the dentist and im about to go to the movies.

im going to go with my biggest suspect as of now. i vote to lynch neph. i didnt like the fact that he said he was cleared of being scum bc he said something scum wouldnt say. done it before when i was scum and a newbie so i think thats my best bet. ill try to catch up after the movies.

I usually catch up from the bottom up and I saw this. I'm gonna drop a preliminary vote for AAF. At first glance it looks like an OMGUS vote but I think that he twisted my words and is using them against me instead of drawing a conclusion from my statement. It reeks of scum to me. I never said I should be or was cleared of being scum because scum wouldn't say that. I said I wouldn't say that if I was scum. It's a subtle distinction but enough to make me suspicious enough to vote. By the way AAF if I'm right about you then well played, that was a good twist and subtle enough it even almost slipped by me.

I vote to lynch AAF

Sorry that I was gone for so long. I'm catching up right now so I will say that my vote is subject to change but it's unlikely.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

 

[dundadundun]

Ok Dun...



Above you very clearly state that my post could indicate a SCUM alliance (or PR involvement) and then say you're going to keep an eye on me and Chill. You also state that Pir's innocence had something to do with it, although I can't think of a reason why that even mattered.
i stated i had thought that was possible and wrote it off. but nothing in this game is as it seems on D1 so wanted to keep my eyes open just in case.


Here I first question your statement.



Your response basically just states that it could be something or it couldn't be...no explanation as to how it was possible or why me and Chill would have done what you said.
shouldn't have had to. you weren't exactly on any "suspect list".


Here I state that you are providing no evidence for why Chill and I could be on a team. From there you don't respond...
that's all very well and good... but you didn't ask me anything. why would i respond?


Then Chill poses a question to Rich. Your name is mentioned in regards to Kash's question, but Chill never asked you anything...
kash asked me a question. others said they'd like to know too. zaffy said he didn't care to hear the answer but thought it was a good question. regardless... it did pertain to me and i responded. i believe that's within the boundaries of the rules.


But you interject and say that Kash is capable of doing something while scum and AGAIN bring up my name saying I could "form alliances"
she is... and you can... what more do you want me to say? doesn't make it related to my former inkling of suspicion.


When I ask what you meant, you say that it was a compliment.
it was.


Then I ask again why you specifically said I could form an alliance. I also say that I don't think it was a compliment because you mentioned me and alliances earlier (look above).
it was.

You "explanation" is something about me as scum teaming up with an innocent and then having them take the fall...
you're capable of it... done it to me before.
So, in conclusion...

1) You initially floated the idea out there that Chill and I are somehow scum or PRs teamed up because of a meaningless post
yep... and in this game it is what it is... no need to get upset about it.
2) When questioned, you offer no reasonable explanation as to how or why that would make any sens
if i had a reasonable explanation at that point i'd have given it. then again the other players that thought the same might have pursued that avenue as well. turned out i didn't think much of it after that. who knew...
3) After no encouragement, you respond to a post not even directed at you and bring up the idea of me making alliances again
there was plenty of encouragement. my name was dropped all around that post and the subject matter. not only that, but there was a current discussion about me embedded.
4) You final response is stating that I could team up with an innocent and have them take the fall
it is true... you're very capable.
See any inconsistencies in there? Your "compliments" seem more like a facade to get my name out there and suggest I could do A, B, and C as scum without any explanation as to how that fits into the context of this game.

yes... i see a HUGE inconsistency... nowhere in your post did you thank me for offering to make you a custom cape.

and why are you worried about getting your name out there? something to hide, pappy?

 

[Rbishop]

what? That's an old gameplay, rb.... asking if anyone is posting from the mafia den is so yesterday, don't you think? not sure what the question is aside from the sarcasm being used to try throwing doubt in my thoughts.

Then post something real instead of a synopsis of you 10 min review of the thread....your thoughts have all the doubt they need without me adding more...and if it is an old game play, it fits both our ages...:rofl:

 

[Rbishop]

because I read through the thread first to see what was being said, then I thought about what caught my interest in all that had gone on for the day and I recalled "rich". Then I went back and pulled his posts.

You pulled his posts, reviewed them and didn't post at all about it....?

 

[Rbishop]

not even a long winded multi quote kash post?

 

[Kashta]

Hey! I resemble that remark! :silly: