Mafia 105: Finding Bigfoot The Game!

Well Pap you're not going to get much out of me till tomorrow when I have sometime.

At this point I think Neph is innocent. If an innocent got his vote there would have
been a vote on him by now.

I still think it was likely someone unfamiliar with the other players who dismembered Rich.
 
Well Pap you're not going to get much out of me till tomorrow when I have sometime.

At this point I think Neph is innocent. If an innocent got his vote there would have
been a vote on him by now.


I still think it was likely someone unfamiliar with the other players who dismembered Rich.

According to Zaffy's count there are currently two votes on Neph.
 
Yes but there were no votes on him yesterday. Wouldn't an innocent who got his vote come out right away with a quick vote particularly when he was acting erratically enough to build a case on.
 
Yes but there were no votes on him yesterday. Wouldn't an innocent who got his vote come out right away with a quick vote particularly when he was acting erratically enough to build a case on.
Possible, but sudden switches are still noticeable and can do more harm than good...plus, I don't see much on Neph on D2 that could be put together in terms of a case.

I'd be more inclined to think Neph is still innocent though. I don't trust the people voting him either.
 
I'm surprised there's been no chatter in this long considering nightfall is today.

Anyone have any thoughts besides the 4 people that have been posting?

I've been thinking and I'm starting to feel like I Kay have been right about townies digging at each other white the scum den sits back and lets it play out.

I am considering a vote change but I have to look back a bit before I make that decision.

Sorry again about latching onto the pap double vote issue and taking it signup far. I hope anyone that comes in to catch up sees that we solved that issue and it has no credence

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 using the MAN app!

Sorry football will always take precedence...Try to fit this in between games..

Possible, but sudden switches are still noticeable and can do more harm than good...plus, I don't see much on Neph on D2 that could be put together in terms of a case.

I'd be more inclined to think Neph is still innocent though. I don't trust the people voting him either.


The JB theory was something I was thinking about. I just posted my thought,never said it was fact. But you shoot it down and then say the same thing as I did about why someone wouldn't just vote there? Also why would JB tell the Hunter to shoot Neph unless he knows he is Bigfoot? Why waste a shot on a hippy when you only have 2? Be easier to watch them and see who they call out and deduce from there then take them out when a case is possible. The dirty hippie will invest as Bigfoot so you can't just shoot willy nilly.
 
So you have it figured out but you're not interested in sharing?

Not sure how I missed that,especially when it was directed at me. I guess it was the I think and not I know but if he was a hippy he would indeed know who Bigfoot is and since he isn't sharing the info.....

That more or less cements him as scum imo. I think Blob and AAF are both scum so I'll stay with my vote as its to spread out now and they or 1 of them could easily move to me. There are still 2 scum and BF so if BF has figured out who is on his team he could vote with them. If we start moving around I'd want to make sure there were 4 of us on Blob or AAF. Already 2 people on me I don't necessarily think are scum. Its to easy for one of them to move to me.
 
Day 3 Vote count
Neph - Ice(243) Blob(266) AAF(289)
Pir - Blob(245)
Jpap - Neph(251)
Ice - Neph(280) Pir(284)
AAF - Ice(319) AAF(329)
Blob - Chill(332)

No votes from:
ssuchem

Nightfall in 3 hours 8 minutes.
 
How can you say I'm leaning innocent when I'm the third highest rated person and on the 50/50 side closer to scum?

You have the more vocal players as scum, which concerns me since those are the only people who seem to be working to flush out the hippies. I see no reason to lean AAF or Chill, especially, towards innocent when neither have done anything to dig up scum.
The numbers were based on scumminess displayed and threat. If you were an average/mediocre player, you'd be a 4 or 5, but you can be a huge threat the opposite team, so you were a 6. I agree that AAF and Chill are somewhat scummy, it's just they've given no material. Basically, a 5 isn't necessarily neutral.

I'm finding it hard to decipher the posts of pretty much everyone. I can make sense of what they say whether I put myself in scum shoes, size 30s (bigfoot shoes), or innocent shoes. I am still considering changing my vote..
 
AquariaCentral.com