Mafia #29 Biological Badlands #2

[Rbishop]

thru post #440...

to genetically test.....

ice (1) by ogre 348

zig (1) by ice 366

grins (1) by cat 397 (who needs to review the rules on posting a vote)

3 of 10 have voted...

 

[johnlarson66]

I understand what you mean and in all honesty your replies have slightly eased my suspicion of you...but not much...

and ogres recent posting has me wondering whether he is really that confused or slipping up big time...though it wouldnt be the first time he did something like this as innocent...

JPap, outside this game whenever someone prefaces something with "in all honesty" or "to be completely truthful" I tend to think anything that follows is complete BS. At the very least I wonder if that means they are lying when they don't give that disclaimer. It isn't that much different when I read things in the game.

Fine, you can think that...I have no objections except that I know it was truth.

but you wont see me voting for Hn or making a big fuss over his posts

jpappy, you went from "slightly eased my suspicion of you...but not much..." to "but you wont see me voting for Hn or making a big fuss over his posts" - really, really fast. I still trying to figure out why. Was it something Grins said?

I have to agree with Grins, in the real world, when someone leads with "In all honesty -", they are most often lying. Also when they say "Yada Yada, BUT -", everything after the BUT is BS.

Another term I "love", is when people lead with "No Offense". When they start out with that, lookout, you are going to get offended.

 

[catfish69hunter]

By all means keep an eye on me. I fully expect it and as soon as someone says that I look innocent I brace to be hit. That's why Catfish looks shady to me and why my concern about Ogre has increased slightly.

So i look shady i think you might want to restate that in my opinion. i think that im just lost, but if lost like the village idiot and shady are the same thing then by all means im shady as all heck!:drool:

 

[IceH2O]

See now screw this Zig was setup crap. Whats to stop the evils from making it look like a setup so they can claim setup and clear Zig for a while? It gives them a chance to throw more suspicion on innocents instead of helping us link the evil team together. I still feel he is the leader and acted on his own though.

Ice, Ogre was saying Bull Cookies in response to you! Then, if I am reading it correctly, your second paragraph is contradicts of your first paragraph.

Also you state the evils were on JM, but choose to test Zigman, who was on ZSandmann. I stand behind my vote for JM, she seemed evil and was not helping the town. At the time she seemed like the best choice. I do see Ogre's point, but think Ogre's points against Ice can be made against me also.

While I am more and more curious about Zigman, his statements that he is innocent are a little concerning. I think he is an easy target for a train.

Ice has moved up on my list.

What are you reading? When did I say the evils were testing Zig? Maybe you need to stop skimming and really read the posts before you try to make a case.

You know I've been replying as I've been reading and HN makes a good point about something I forgot about, so I went back and read that section of thread again.
Jpaps post on Zig out of nowhere, why did he feel the need to explain why he wasn't voting him? No one asked, he says he didn't want to get questioned on it. Well lots of people haven't commented on other people. Jpaps posts have me leaning him heavily evil and helping to make me look less at Zig.
If one is innocent the other is evil.

I retract my vote on Zigman

I'll have to think a bit more on who I want to vote for though Jpap is really sticking out and the clue isn't helping him.

JL is making me a bit nervous with his posts and also the clue could be pointing to him also.

I don't really see Cory doing anything he hasn't done in past games, doesn't clear him though.

Zig still has my eye. Not entirely convinced innocent but the fact that others I don't trust seem to be pushing his innocence has me wondering.

Screw it, everyone is evil.Even the person I thought was innocent now looks evil.



I agree with HN on another post. I don't post to look innocent. I post to out evil. If by looking evil they use that to their advantage then they are found out. If by chance the innocents take me out then hopefully they can gather info from my death.

I'll make my vote later after looking through with a clear mind.

 

[catfish69hunter]

I vote to genetically test GRINS i hope this straightens out any problems with my vote

 

[Hooked Newbie]

Now that makes me even more nervous frankly, you've now decided you won't be voting for HN? I'm not convinced he is mafia but I'm sure in heck not convinced he is innocent and ready to declare I'll not be voting for him in this game. Why are you so sure?

jpappy, you went from "slightly eased my suspicion of you...but not much..." to "but you wont see me voting for Hn or making a big fuss over his posts" - really, really fast. I still trying to figure out why. Was it something Grins said?

I have to agree with Grins, in the real world, when someone leads with "In all honesty -", they are most often lying. Also when they say "Yada Yada, BUT -", everything after the BUT is BS.

Another term I "love", is when people lead with "No Offense". When they start out with that, lookout, you are going to get offended.

No offense, but in all honesty... I agree with you both. Yada, yada, I think Jpappy is innocent.

 

[johnlarson66]

What are you reading? When did I say the evils were testing Zig? Maybe you need to stop skimming and really read the posts before you try to make a case.

Just a part of the post.

I think I should have used better punctation or been more clear.

Here is what I said "Also you state the evils were on JM, but choose to test Zigman"

It would have made more sense to say, "Also you state the evils were on JM, but YOU choose to test Zigman"

I did not mean for it to say the evils were testing Zig. I was responding that you stated that the evils were on JM. I would have expected for you to vote for someone that voted for JM.

I hope this clear it up.

I am not sure when I skim more, if it is when I am innocent or evil. I am not even sure if I have any "tells". I am sure if I did, no one would tell me.

I agree that I need to stop skimming.

 

[The Zigman]

Before i forget, I'll post my vote now.
My feelings havent really changed since yesterday so,

I vote to geneticaly test Cory Lover

 

[Grins]

Cat, if I was worried about you voting for me I'd have not pointed out that you might want to reword the vote to test me. Keep your vote there, change it, embroider it in cross-stitch on a pillow if you so desire.

Screw it, everyone is evil.

Now here is a thought I can really get behind today.

No offense, but in all honesty... I agree with you both. Yada, yada, I think Jpappy is innocent.

:grinyes:

 

[johnlarson66]

I vote to genetically test GRINS i hope this straightens out any problems with my vote

Cat, if I was worried about you voting for me I'd have not pointed out that you might want to reword the vote to test me. Keep your vote there, change it, embroider it in cross-stitch on a pillow if you so desire.


Now here is a thought I can really get behind today.


:grinyes:

And I thought I was skimming!