Mafia 30: Witness Protection - The Play

Crap. 2 townies and the doctor. As i expected and posted, three toes was innocent. Now tree looks more suspicious than ever to me.

[AC] Gunslinger;1378771 said:
and where have you seen the Dane Cook sig thing, as if it matters....

I like Dane Cook, hes funny.

[AC] Tree_Hugger;1378893 said:
Ouch...the only good thing I can think to say about this nightfall result is that at least there were no UD's.

I'm really sorry Old, and fellow townies. I really did think Old looked scummy from his posts.

I will accept responsibility, and also for Scoop's because I don't think Old would have attacked him/her if he hadn't been put under such threat of lynching.

I am just a townie, so at least we wouldn't lose another power role if ya'll want to lynch me. I will go back through the thread and see if I can find some suspects at least for you all to look at when it is shown that I am indeed a townie who made a dreadful mistake.

Paragraph one... A 'good old towny' type of wording.

Paragraph two... Another 'good old towny' wording scheduale.

Paragraph three... 'good old towny says sorry'

Paragraph four... "I'm just a towny" "at least I'm not a power role" "I am indeed a townie who made a dreadful mistake."

What happened here?! You start with I'm a good, sorry towny for starting the three toes train, then you say REPEATEDLY that you are a towny who is sorry. This post just screams "cheap mafia coverup" to me. Does anyone else not notice this?


[AC] Tree_Hugger;1378935 said:
Rickets, I will be blunt. I do not trust you. I don't have a good feeling about you, your posts come across as a bit anti-town. I don't trust myself at this point to make a good judgment on who to vote for however.

I don't believe anyone on Old3Toes is Mafia...it would be such a totally unnecessary risk for them to have voted there when only 5 of us did. I would bet they are all on different people. I am still worried about the lack of participation from Wing Nut and Doomsday. I do still believe the Mafia are going to lay as low as possible and hopefully we can keep pressure on everyone so they have to keep posting. I am considering Rickets as mafia also...the "I told you so's" and the efforts to set me up before nightfall seem really suspicious. I can understand no one else seeing it the way I do, since you just don't know if I am a townie or not.

I vote to lynch no one....this is just in case, to avoid UD, until I make up my mind and have more time to think things over and reread stuff since I was so off on Old3toes.

Paragraph one... "a scummy feeling" is what made you lynch our townie three toes. So, now you want to lynch another on another "scummy feeling"? Bad strategy, as i will not be voting for Rickets tonight.

Paragraph two... First, you try to say no one on three toes was mafia. This seems strange, considering you voted for him. Then, you get rid of the attention on your excuse by accusing 3 others. And to top it all off, you say we don't know if you're a towny or not. Well, what was that first quote supposed to be?! It basically said: "I'm just a towny, oh I'm sorry for starting a train on another towny, and I'm a towny. By the way, I'm not a power role, just a towny, who is an innocent towny." Who is foolish enough to say this? Maybe a noob mafia player?

Paragraph three... Another comment on how "off" you were on three toes. More distancing and excuses, I almost expected you to add "as I'm just an innocent townie" to that.

[AC] Driver8;1378991 said:
I have to say Uh-Oh looks pretty darn scummy right now. Yes, I realize Rickets said pretty much the same thing....but isn't it mafia that usually post the "first thought" of it, and wait for others to follow? Rickets has posted a couple things that made me stop for a sec, but not much more then that. Uh-oh on the other hand has many times.

Narwhale's vote for no one seemed a bit convenient IMO, Wingnut also stands out to me...actually many people have me worried but after that night fall these people seem to stand out the most to me.

One other thing is standing out to me, not to start the whole me and Hammer thing again, but Hammer did post there was a train forming on 3toes way back when there were only 2 on it, I don't remember what post number it was right now, I just know I questioned them on how it was a train with only 2 people.

I will be back later this evening or in the morning to post more thoughts after I have re read everything yet again.

I'm watching you, Driver, you seem suspicious to me. But I'm not tree, and you won't be getting a "you seem scummy" vote.

I vote to lynch Tree_Hugger for the many, many good reasons stated above.


Good morning, all. Hope you have a nice day.
 
Uhoh, who else do you suspect besides me? I realize I will be an easy target due to my mistake and the fact I brought the case against Old3Toes that caused others to vote for him, I can accept that, which is why I try to convey that it's okay if you want to lynch me, you don't have to worry about losing another power role since we just lost 2 last night. However, if you are a townie you have got to look into other people as well because I am not mafia and I don't want to see an entire day cycle wasted by taking the easy mark with no discussion or suspicion being tossed out onto other people.
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;1379421 said:
Uhoh, who else do you suspect besides me? I realize I will be an easy target due to my mistake and the fact I brought the case against Old3Toes that caused others to vote for him, I can accept that, which is why I try to convey that it's okay if you want to lynch me, you don't have to worry about losing another power role since we just lost 2 last night. However, if you are a townie you have got to look into other people as well because I am not mafia and I don't want to see an entire day cycle wasted by taking the easy mark with no discussion or suspicion being tossed out onto other people.

More excuses. You'd think one would know not to yell "I'm innocent" in a game like this.
 
sorry Old3Toes, i actually thought we were gonna get a scumbag on the first night.

UhOh, I am more suspicious of you than I am of Tree Hugger. It wasn't tree hugger that caused me to vote for 3Toes, I was suspicious of him before Tree's post. I believe Scoop also felt he was the best suspect at the time.

I'm not suprised you are trying to hang blame for the lynch on Tree Hugger.
 
[AC] UhOhChongo;1379422 said:
More excuses. You'd think one would know not to yell "I'm innocent" in a game like this.

I hope you have your excuses lined up for why you took an easy target and ignored questions about who else you find suspicious if I am lynched and everyone can see I was telling the truth. I know you said in your vote post that you are watching Driver, but I really hope that you are watching everyone and give out more solid reasons for your suspicions.

Frankly, I doubt a mafia would be bold enough to lead the charge against me, so you are most likely not mafia, but don't make yourself an easy target by making a bee line for me, or the next nightfall will be an exact duplicate of this one and the mafia will be able to lurk and blend in even more while letting us just pick each other off one by one.
 
[AC] UhOhChongo;1379413 said:
Crap. 2 townies and the doctor. As i expected and posted, three toes was innocent. Now tree looks more suspicious than ever to me.



I like Dane Cook, hes funny.



Paragraph one... A 'good old towny' type of wording.

Paragraph two... Another 'good old towny' wording scheduale.

Paragraph three... 'good old towny says sorry'

Paragraph four... "I'm just a towny" "at least I'm not a power role" "I am indeed a townie who made a dreadful mistake."

What happened here?! You start with I'm a good, sorry towny for starting the three toes train, then you say REPEATEDLY that you are a towny who is sorry. This post just screams "cheap mafia coverup" to me. Does anyone else not notice this?




Paragraph one... "a scummy feeling" is what made you lynch our townie three toes. So, now you want to lynch another on another "scummy feeling"? Bad strategy, as i will not be voting for Rickets tonight.

Paragraph two... First, you try to say no one on three toes was mafia. This seems strange, considering you voted for him. Then, you get rid of the attention on your excuse by accusing 3 others. And to top it all off, you say we don't know if you're a towny or not. Well, what was that first quote supposed to be?! It basically said: "I'm just a towny, oh I'm sorry for starting a train on another towny, and I'm a towny. By the way, I'm not a power role, just a towny, who is an innocent towny." Who is foolish enough to say this? Maybe a noob mafia player?

Paragraph three... Another comment on how "off" you were on three toes. More distancing and excuses, I almost expected you to add "as I'm just an innocent townie" to that.



I'm watching you, Driver, you seem suspicious to me. But I'm not tree, and you won't be getting a "you seem scummy" vote.

I vote to lynch Tree_Hugger for the many, many good reasons stated above.


Good morning, all. Hope you have a nice day.


Just to clarify some things...First of all, yes my initial vote on Old3Toes was the result of a post that looked very scummy to me, however, if you read more of my posts, you will see that I also felt that his responses after the vote were also scummy. What other reason is there to vote for some one? (I do expect an answer to this question)

I do not believe the people on Old3Toes were mafia. I don't think it was necessary for them to vote for him since I know for a fact 2 of the people on him are innocent. It's possible 1 slipped in there, but I don't think it's likely.

I did not suggest lynching Rickets based on a scummy feeling or any other feeling. Read more of my posts past that one. You accuse me of wanting to lynch another person on a "scummy feeling" when guess what, that is the exact opposite of what I said. I said I didn't trust my feelings enough to vote for someone like that again, hence the vote for No One in that post and hence why I have gone back to my original theory that the mafia will be low posters who lurk and only post when they have to in order to stay out of the spot light, or as most would say, off the radar.
 
I hate that we lost two of our PR's last night but I hate even more that it seems the good guys are going at each others throats. And everything happened so sudden because the town isn't communicating well, something Old Three Toes was trying to tell us. He was right that we do need to list who we think are Mafia AND list reasons, the more the better. And the earlier the better, so let's not wait until nightfall again and allow last minute jitters to rule us.


[AC] Driver8;1378455 said:
First let me start with :silly:......gentlemanly huh....funny I got more of a "girl" vibe from you, "sweetheart"??? Well, maybe you do know who I am!!!
Maybe I'm in touch with my feminine side, LMAO. :silly:

[AC] Gunslinger;1378471 said:
Hey Mad, can we change the name of the game to "Who is Who" with the goal of identifying the person(s) behind the alias...?

Or, "lets multi-quote 200 posts in my post"...?

Talk about day one drivel.....
:coughtypicalrbsmart***cough:

Vote count thru post 234

O3T (4) - maelstrom 147, Tree_Hugger 212, Tiburon 215, scoop411 216
C-note (3) - RICKETS 114, Doomsday 192, wing nut 208
HI IQ (2) - Nemesis 132, Driver8 163
Driver8 (2) - Hammerhead 173, BadHaggis 209
wing nut (1) - HI IQ 165
narwhal (1) - UhOh 187
Tiburon (1) - O3T 218
No lynch (1) - narwhal 224

No votes recorded from: C-note, Gunslinger

Nightfall in roughly 2 hours 45 minutes. Please send any PMs as required.
I am going to watch all those on O3T carefully as I'm sure there is a Mafia in that line-up somewhere. Typically it would be the 3rd voter, a pretty safe spot for Mafia, so I would say Tiburon is most suspect. Also C-Note's vote for O3T is suspect. Gunslinger's vote for C-Note makes him less Mafia to me, but just a tad. Hope to see more thoughts from him, though.

[AC] Driver8;1378991 said:
I have to say Uh-Oh looks pretty darn scummy right now. Yes, I realize Rickets said pretty much the same thing....but isn't it mafia that usually post the "first thought" of it, and wait for others to follow? Rickets has posted a couple things that made me stop for a sec, but not much more then that. Uh-oh on the other hand has many times.

Narwhale's vote for no one seemed a bit convenient IMO, Wingnut also stands out to me...actually many people have me worried but after that night fall these people seem to stand out the most to me.

One other thing is standing out to me, not to start the whole me and Hammer thing again, but Hammer did post there was a train forming on 3toes way back when there were only 2 on it, I don't remember what post number it was right now, I just know I questioned them on how it was a train with only 2 people.

I will be back later this evening or in the morning to post more thoughts after I have re read everything yet again.
I was commenting on the early votes for UhOH, votes seemingly without much reason. And it was Old3Toes who responded to you that yes, two votes on a person can be considered a train.

[AC] Driver8;1379007 said:
Well, I went back to find the post....added the quote so others can see, it was actually a comment on UhOH, not 3toes...so my mistake and I take that back and apologize...this actually helps me see Hammer a little less mafia IMO.
Glad you corrected yourself. I interpret you saying you see me less Mafia as "Darn, can't find anything to hang Hammer on yet! Maybe we'll just have to put a hit on them." :lipssealedsmilie:
 
Alright My Revised List:

Driver8
Tiburon
C-Note

Reasons previously mentioned.


And to a slightly less degree I also suspect Maelstrom for his vote on O3T and grilling O3T for asking everyone for their thoughts on ppl. Communication within the thread is all we innocents have to fight against the Mafia. Why limit it even in the beginning?


I still am leary of all the low posters, though I know not all are Mafia. Some do seem to have plausible thoughts.


For now and unless a better suspect comes to light,
I vote to lynch Driver.
 
You know after reading through again, the parinoia is definatly setting in here...sooo many look guilty. I have to say though Narwhal is looking very scummy at this point.

[AC] narwhal;1378328 said:
So, I've read a bit more, and am not happy with my vote. I'm gonna try to get on again before nightfall, but don't know if I'll make it.

I retract my vote for maelstrom.

I vote to lynch no one.
So two days in a row you vote to lynch no one, now yes I realize you have time to come on and vote someone before night fall....but you state you don't know it you will make it back before nightfall, why would you not at least put your vote on the one you think to look most scummy at this point? Is it because you want to see where all the votes are landing first, are you afraid to be "linked" to an innocents lynch? I really do not like this at all.

[AC] narwhal;1377367 said:
'K. The new logging on thing threw me, as I didn't see it until I had used up all my tries. It's only 8pm here, so I don't think that I'm really late in posting, or not following, or laying low. Busy day.

1) Being the first to post is neat, not mafia.

Driver8:

2) Meanie! :silly: Wasn't much to post about last night, so I didn't post.

3) Who the heck cares who is who? Roles weren't assigned based on previous play, right? Be done with it.

4) Maelstrom's avatar gets me everytime! I keep trying to wipe at my screen.

5) I don't see anything there, but am concerned that you won't tell us what you see. Tell us. If you're a townie, then, as I have been told countless times, the possible sacrifice (you) is worth the certainty (who was gunning for you).This is shady.

6) I don't know why, but this post struck me wrong. I thought, on the first read, that it was a noob mafia admitting to purposefully not protecting fellow mafia. Rereading it, I understand what was posted, but the thought seemed to have merit, because t crossed my mind, and so there might have been a subconscious reason for it.

7) I don't like the tone of TreeHugger's posts. Or of CNotes, but this could be an OMGUS feeling creeping in.

8) lol. I think it's funny to see people trying to change up the posting style, using different vocab etc, but only sometimes. :)

9) Will read some more, look over things, and vote before I go to bed.

--narwhal--
You say you are not laying low....but you have only posted a handful of times, yes I realize RL does take up time from posting, but this and your list for today are the only posts that really say anything in them...if your time is so limited for the game, why would you at least not try and get as many thoughts in as possible when you can?
 
AquariaCentral.com