Mafia #33 - Bruce Campbell Vs. Army of Darkness

Geesch, leading by example, what a weak statement, even from a newbie.

I find it odd you have kept basically quiet this game and never came up with this wonderful idea of yours when the first two people cast votes before me.

Bkw voted hooked in post 13 and judge voted catfish in post 28. My vote for pix did not come until post 105, Sat, 5/24 at 2:18 PM.

My post about folks being sackless and not voting was post #233 on Sun at 4:50 PM. Guess that post has really led the folks down a foolish path, eh?
 
Maybe it was more the timing of your vote.

How does this list NARROW hisher choices? IMO, it would only help him/her at this point.
Evil Ash will probably not want to pick someone to turn who has a lot of suspicion on them or who appears on a lot of people's lists. Nor do I think EA will pick someone most ppl have on their list as most likely to be turned. With EA's choices narrowed it will be easier for the Town to track EA down in the long run. If you don't see what I'm trying to say you probably won't until much later in the game. I don't think it's ever too early to speak our minds, though.
 
I have been thinking and looking over the posts again and thinking some more. There are two people that have me most interested in them. The first is Pix he has played before and is a good player. He knows better than to lay low so why is he doing it now. He just seems off to me I just dont know.

Then there is the newb Aqua, they have 1 post to date and it was a question that was answered in the rules. IMO the newb may have been given a role that they doent know how to handle and as such desided to lay low and not do much at all.

For now my choice will be made on the fact that one person knows the rules and how the game is played and they have started to lay low. I VOTE TO LYNCH PIXL8R
 
Evil Ash will probably not want to pick someone to turn who has a lot of suspicion on them or who appears on a lot of people's lists. Nor do I think EA will pick someone most ppl have on their list as most likely to be turned. With EA's choices narrowed it will be easier for the Town to track EA down in the long run. If you don't see what I'm trying to say you probably won't until much later in the game. I don't think it's ever too early to speak our minds, though.
Plant, i do see what your saying (kinda) YES, it would help Evil Ash/ly to decide who NOT to pick at first.....in turn helping them to decide who TO pick, later in the game yep, I can see it later in the game like after a couple night falls that is, not now though is my point. We are going to have a hard enough time not getting an innocent this first night fall, let alone helping him/her decide who would be the safest bet to pick.
 
... Those of you waiting to the last minute are not much of any help.

I'm not sure I understand the rush to vote. It's basically a crap shoot so why not wait and maybe better information will surface. If we're talking about our suspicions doesn't this serve the same purpose as voting as far as getting information out.

At this point my vote would be one of respect. Evil Ash requires a quality player so who do I have to vote for the person I think could pull off the part. Being new I don't have a lot to base that on.
 
I'm not sure I understand the rush to vote. It's basically a crap shoot so why not wait and maybe better information will surface. If we're talking about our suspicions doesn't this serve the same purpose as voting as far as getting information out.

At this point my vote would be one of respect. Evil Ash requires a quality player so who do I have to vote for the person I think could pull off the part. Being new I don't have a lot to base that on.

Well, my answer would be that the votes would generate conversation.

Most of these games have 4-5 extremely active players, posting fairly often.

Another 4-8 that post mid level wise, but often not explaining anything or cught skimmimg.

An the last 4-6, are rare posters offering little input.

Sometimes, real life issues interfere and I understand that. Sometimes, RL issues are spouted, but I rarely believe them.

Now toss in this holiday weekend and the long first day, and a "build a team" layout, the sooner folks are willing to commit, the sooner their posting and responses can help us.

We already have almost impossible odds. Just take a look at how the votes are spread as of right now and realize we are trying to lynch 1 of 16.

Sometimes if we are a bit harsh, people respond....that is usually when they slip up, in my experience.

Right Charlie...?
 
I have been thinking and looking over the posts again and thinking some more. There are two people that have me most interested in them. The first is Pix he has played before and is a good player. He knows better than to lay low so why is he doing it now. He just seems off to me I just dont know.

He will have many alibis this weekend as to why he couldn't be on the boards. Not sure how much weight to place on this just yet.

Then there is the newb Aqua, they have 1 post to date and it was a question that was answered in the rules. IMO the newb may have been given a role that they doent know how to handle and as such desided to lay low and not do much at all.

I highly doubt this is the case but it is tough to tell since Aqua has no posts from which to derive any information from.
 
I'm not sure I understand the rush to vote. It's basically a crap shoot so why not wait and maybe better information will surface. If we're talking about our suspicions doesn't this serve the same purpose as voting as far as getting information out.

At this point my vote would be one of respect. Evil Ash requires a quality player so who do I have to vote for the person I think could pull off the part. Being new I don't have a lot to base that on.

It is a crap shoot...but as RB stated it does bring out the discussions which is the only way to gain information. Talking about suspicions doesn't bring out as much as accusing someone outright (right RB ;)). Don't forget...you can change your vote at any time.
 
AquariaCentral.com