Mafia #33 - Bruce Campbell Vs. Army of Darkness

Lady G said:
Simply I freaked at the time, I have said this a few times now Dawg. When I first switched, I really didn't realize I hadn't "retracted" and that it didn't count. I did not want the night to end in a tie. When HN, switched to me, I figured I was the one going but at least it wasn't going to be a tie, then when Hooked switched to Jensons, in the end when I switched to Jensons, I THOUGHT it was making her the lead vote getter.

Actually, now that I think about it more, I wonder if RB was trying to get me to come off Jensons and on to Chill to save myself.
Click to expand...

I understand the confusion...trust me. I went back and looked and when I put my vote on RB you originally went to RB and then took yours off RB to follow HN's vote. HN never went to RB, though he expressed interest in doing so.

I guess this question may be more for HN.
 
Well, I'm sure RB will get a kick out the chaos he has caused, but I have to go for a while...I'll be back on in a few.

If my actions get me lynched I am sorry everyone...but I did freak out, and I did loose track of who was where, how, why all that. IF Rb is innocent, that was defiantly NOT a town friendly move..there is enough confusion on things here as it is adding more did NOTHING in any way to help.

I still don't get what the switch to JM was all about, the one thing I can think of which I said earlier is he was trying to get me to "save" my self buy moving my vote to Chill and lynching him. HN, had already stated if it ends in a tie he would switch to me. I don't know what he was trying to prove by doing that (RB not HN).
 
Lady G said:
I have to say...at this point, I just do not know what I think. I still feel something with Jensons, but if she is EA then RB can't be. RB throwing so much confusion out I just don't get it. Then who he voted on made no sense at all, because he had earlier stated he pretty much had her as innocent. So, why of ALL people playing pick one of the 2 ppl you have already put down as innocent in your mind.
Click to expand...
Yes, it is weird that he chose to vote Judge if he just wanted a tie. I would like an answer from him as well.
 
Guys, and dolls ;), You keep discussing the switching, and vote tallies, prior to nightfall, last night, yet you keep ignoring my vote for judgemax.
 
pixl8r said:
Guys, and dolls ;), You keep discussing the switching, and vote tallies, prior to nightfall, last night, yet you keep ignoring my vote for judgemax.
Click to expand...
LOL, I didn't forget you Pix. If you'll go back and look at the vote tallies I posted 854 and 856 your vote was noted. We are discussing RB's vote for JM which didn't make sense unless he was just shooting for a tie and didn't care who he voted. But he voted JM when his post to you about JM posting alot when evil suggested he thought she wasn't evil.
 
dirtydawg10 said:
Two major things from last night that don't feel right to me.

At 8:33pm RB ties up the game. Then in the next 27 minutes RB never chimes in to back up his vote change.

Even more disturbing at this point is that when I changed my vote to RB, after I thought LG voted for him and HN expressed interest in voting for RB neither of them ultimately went to RB after I switched my vote there. Why waste my vote? I was trying to put the vote over the top on RB. Why not keep your votes on RB? I understand it seemed to go by quicker than it looks on paper, believe me my adrenaline was rushing. Can HN and LG please elaborate on this??
Click to expand...

dirtydawg10 said:
I understand the confusion...trust me. I went back and looked and when I put my vote on RB you originally went to RB and then took yours off RB to follow HN's vote. HN never went to RB, though he expressed interest in doing so.

I guess this question may be more for HN.
Click to expand...

At the time (and still now pending Rb posting), Jensons was my number one choice. I thought it was 4-3 at the end until I read back over and by then Z had posted night. At the end of the night, LG was my #2 suspect which is why I initially switched to her. I thought the lack of a retraction may have been intentional (she's played enough games to know better), but she then followed up on the change so I went back to Jensons. I voted Rb immediately after nightfall because I want some sort of explanation. I'll help to lynch him happily now even if he is innocent because that was a completely anti-town move. If you all want to vote all the late changers starting with Rb as JL suggested, I'm good with being included in that. The confusing part is that part of me thinks strongly that the sole evil would have either sat back with their vote locked in or changed to push a lynch. Someone (I forget who) posted about the EA's vote already being on one of the 3 in contention and I find that to make alot of sense (and fits with Jensons vote on Chill).
 
pixl8r said:
Guys, and dolls ;), You keep discussing the switching, and vote tallies, prior to nightfall, last night, yet you keep ignoring my vote for judgemax.
Click to expand...
Yes, Pix you voted Jmax...we know, didn't mean to ignore you...now your vote is on me so is there a point to you bringing it up?
 
Well, I am good with a vote to RB my other choice would be Jensons. I'm not sold on Jmax just yet, I know I said I could see RB changing her if he was the E.Ash, and I still can...but at the moment RB and Jensons are highest on my list.
 
Hooked Newbie said:
At the time (and still now pending Rb posting), Jensons was my number one choice. I thought it was 4-3 at the end until I read back over and by then Z had posted night. At the end of the night, LG was my #2 suspect which is why I initially switched to her. I thought the lack of a retraction may have been intentional (she's played enough games to know better), but she then followed up on the change so I went back to Jensons. I voted Rb immediately after nightfall because I want some sort of explanation. I'll help to lynch him happily now even if he is innocent because that was a completely anti-town move. If you all want to vote all the late changers starting with Rb as JL suggested, I'm good with being included in that. The confusing part is that part of me thinks strongly that the sole evil would have either sat back with their vote locked in or changed to push a lynch. Someone (I forget who) posted about the EA's vote already being on one of the 3 in contention and I find that to make alot of sense (and fits with Jensons vote on Chill).
Click to expand...
Looking back on things I do find Jensons very suspect. If she wanted to avoid a ud and hadn't read thru the postings why did she put her vote on the highest vote getter? While I think RB is suspect for the vote tie I'm not so sure he would do that as EA. I think you're right about the EA wanting to push a lynch and their vote being tied up already.

I vote to lynch Jensons

Subject to change if a better suspect comes along.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom