Mafia 34-Time Crisis(the Play)

[FireDancer7905]

So night was interesting. Cool that the terrorists hit Z for us. One more down!

I think that the NewFlash tells us nothing. We have no idea what/how it was changed, or if it was, and so it is useless.

I don't know how I feel about HN being saved by the Doc. I don't think that it makes him automatically innocent. And, now the Doc only has one lynch protection left, which could be bad if s/he is investigated by the SWAT and has more info to go on.

Right now, I'm not sure who looks the most Terrorist-y to me. I'm going to celebrate the last day of school with hubby, make dinner, and come back later.

 

[IceH2O]

good point...but dawg was around during nightfall. Is it worth the risk...I'm not sure.

How does that prove my innocence?

I can't believe no one is looking at Dawg. His vote would have killed HN if the Dr didn't save him.

Since everyone is against the tie votes I vote to lynch Dawg

Just because they can swap the newsflash doesn't mean they would. Since we know they can and they know we know they can they don't have to because we won't believe it anyway.

I explained why right here.

If I knew the innocents wouldn't trust the newsflash why change it?

 

[jpappy789]

That's fuzzy math at best. Them knowing they don't have the bomb is a given unless I missed a major event.

Thats what I said...they know people who DON'T have the bomb, which makes it easier to find the person who does. So if we don't lynch suspects to find terrorists we give them free chances to hit people.

 

[Hooked Newbie]

I'm waiting for G's take on things, but right now I have 4 people that I'm leary of.

G- Obvious reasons.
Ice- I'm not sure, but gotta be curious. Playing a great game if evil.
Dawg- The newsflash reference can't be totally ignored.
Mad- fits the bill of the quiet person and I believe he's stubborn enough to spurn Rb's protest.

 

[jpappy789]

I explained why right here.

If I knew the innocents wouldn't trust the newsflash why change it?

who said no one is trusting the newsflash? you are right now.

and is there a reason why you said "If I knew the innocents wouldn't trust the newsflash why change it?":lipssealedsmilie:

 

[IceH2O]

who said no one is trusting the newsflash? you are right now.

and is there a reason why you said "If I knew the innocents wouldn't trust the newsflash why change it?":lipssealedsmilie:

I was speaking from the terrorists viewpoint. but if thats the best you have then quit posting fluff and vote me.

 

[dirtydawg10]

When I first read the news flash I saw the same as the rest of you. But if I was the terrorist and had the chance to change it don't you think I would have? I'm done talking about this because I know you guys have to figure this out for yourselves.

 

[jpappy789]

that's why I asked.

 

[jpappy789]

I agree with dawg on this one. Even if you figured that the innocents wouldn't trust the newsflash why wouldn't you at least change it for safety's sake? No reason to have one of your names floating around.

 

[Madcrawdad]

voting no one night one could go either way for me for reasons already stated...



I've been invisible ever since I've been playing mafia...I just haven't changed back because I am lazy...

okay, I was thinking about this while at work so just bear with me...because of the game format we don't need to lynch all of the terrorists to win the game, just need the person with the bomb to survive until the time limit is up. So based on that we should all be careful not to get carried away and lynch people for dumb reasons and keep a sharp eye out as usual for any one pushing lynches based on weak reasons...they could be mafia digging for the bomb carrier. This is kinda why I am iffy about a no vote night one...the more citizens gone the better chance that the terrorists get the bomb...

its night but I am going to post anyways because Ice doesn't seem to get that all it takes is one hit or lynch for us to not have the bomb anymore, it doesn't matter how many off us there are compared to the terrorists. If we sit back at let them pick at us the chances get better that they end up with the bomb as the game gets closer to the end...I see quite a different attitude from Ice. Why are you backing off so much?

Jpap, a question for you...

If you look in the 1st quote above from Day 1, you seem to have a much more laidback approach to the game, urging caution, and considering a 'no lynch' vote, as you claim that lynching innocents narrows down the field for the terrorists who want to find the bomb.

In the second quote you say you see a different attitude from Ice, but I kind of see a different attitude from you... acting like we really need to lynch people.

Makes me wonder if you weren't the turn on Night 1... Thoughts?