Mafia 40 "Life behind bars" The Play

It's a typo....

This is why i dont post ideas, having a plan is viewed as being guilty.

You realize too, despite what everyone says, it's still true that if you talk more, you get lynched, even if it's just conjecture and trying to sound out ideas. And people who talk less, don't. So that's my cue.
 
You realize too, despite what everyone says, it's still true that if you talk more, you get lynched, even if it's just conjecture and trying to sound out ideas. And people who talk less, don't. So that's my cue.

There's no common sense to this game :cry:
 
:shakehead:

Only innocents get investigations, so we dont have to worry bout that

Im tryin to figure out how you and LG see me pushing. I mentioned it and laid it out, people asked questioned and i answered. I never said everyone had to do it. The only reason it stayed around so long was cause ppl kept bringing it back up.

Really......how would they be safe? the idea was to get the most from the investigations. If the snitches were lined up then it would mean we might find 1......why is that bad?




It's a typo....

This is why i dont post ideas, having a plan is viewed as being guilty.


Welcome to the club lol.


As for the other things you bolded.

If we do it by lineup and only find 1 when we could just invest who we think and find more is a better option.

As for the snitches not getting invests I'd need clarification from HN on that one. Usually the terminology covers the population and snitches are also part of the population. It only says the Underground doesn't get invests, it doesn't say the snitches don't.

But either way going down the list doesn't work as well as randomized invests would.

If HN says snitched don't get invests I might retract. If you are a snitch it might not out the PRs but you could have looked at the list seen this protected some of you and why you decided to run with it.
 
In the rules under the Roles heading it states that snitches "have the power to investigate once per night"..............
 
NJ every other game you say you don't want to chance lynching an innocent person on day 1, so why shank G right out of the gate. This is very inconsistent with your normal play. The more I think about this the more inclined I am to vote for you.
 
Snitches: You were planted by the corrupt Warden to keep an eye out and to inform him each night of who should be beaten to death by the Guards. Before night, the snitches must email or PM me their top 2 choices for a beating. I will randomly choose which is selected. You have the power to investigate once per night to find someone’s true identity. Before night, the snitches must email or PM me their top 2 choices for investigation. Members of the Underground will appear innocent on night 1.
 
Bahahaha, Mad you are not one I'd expect to slip either. 1:39 to 1:45 when Doomsday posted, you could be him trying to cover it up, but it doesn't matter so i'll leave it at that.

My top two right now are scoop and Chill. I think noodles has been sort of anti-innocents (or whatever you's call us this game) and nothing major but Chills defensiveness to the investigation plan bothered me. I totally think the plan has holes but to try and completely derail all concept of a cooperative movement is silly.

I probably lean my trust most towards BKW right now, he is at least trying to have us all come together.

I don't think it is safe to assign people to investigate unless there is overlap, otherwise the ones that will find a snitch are up to be beat down. So either we pick a list of most likely snitches and double up or we all keep our choice to ourself. I lean to the latter. I think we should all agree to a pact that we will use our invest tomorrow so we get the max number of chances. Waiting later narrows the field but also possibly lowers our number of invests. An invest should ONLY be revealed if it was on a snitch. Innocents or PRs should not be said for protection purposes.

Also I vote to shank scoop.


If the plan is flawed and endangers power roles why is arguing against it bad? I'm not arguing against cooperation I have consistently said we should all use our investigations on day 2 to get maximum benefit, and we should out any snitches. I'm saying we should be careful that we don't hurt the town by tipping our hand too soon or leaving our PR's out to dry. That you find a problem with that makes me wonder about you.
 
Yeah that's true - but I already explained that I assumed Sunday night would be lynch, and I still had ONE vote change I could use if I had to, whereas if I didn't vote at all, and I missed the vote, I might UD, if I couldn't get back before Sunday night. Pretty self explanatory if you ask me. If you check out my Avatar/title, you'll see I have a real bad history of waiting too long to vote :/. Didn't want that to happen this game, because if I can't put a vote out at least once per day, even on the weekends, I shouldn't really be playing. Better for me to look into something, and put the vote out, and come back and change it if need be.

But I'm happy with my vote, actually, which is why I didn't recant it or change it, even once I learned that two days from Friday was NOT Sunday night, in fact, but Monday night.
 
Welcome to the club lol.


As for the other things you bolded.

If we do it by lineup and only find 1 when we could just invest who we think and find more is a better option.

As for the snitches not getting invests I'd need clarification from HN on that one. Usually the terminology covers the population and snitches are also part of the population. It only says the Underground doesn't get invests, it doesn't say the snitches don't.

But either way going down the list doesn't work as well as randomized invests would.

If HN says snitched don't get invests I might retract. If you are a snitch it might not out the PRs but you could have looked at the list seen this protected some of you and why you decided to run with it.

Everytime i try to get away....They keep pulling me back in!!

The reason for the lineup, as stated, would so we could find increase chances. If everyone picks there own then the more popular players will prob get doubles on them. It doesnt have to be the line up, if its dice or whatever.

The reason i picked the list was
A. because it's established by someone not in the game
b. it removes bias to pick popular players, and spreads the votes out.
c. Keeps snitches from saying they investigated this person.

There isnt any other real way to do it random and trust everyone.

i took it as "true" innocents. HN can we get a ruling

The other part of the list would be this. The snitches prob woulda hit the person that woulda revealed them.

To spell it out: The mafia would've(past tense) tried to silence the person below them, as not to be found out. So more then likly night 2 beatdown woulda prob been someone who woulda found them out. That's just more info that coulda been used.

Once again im not pushing the idea im explaining it.:crazy:
 
AquariaCentral.com