Mafia #48 - Blarney Castle

Wyomingite said:
Not much to explain, Jpappy. Simple observation, by a "rookie". Ice drew more from it than I meant. Not sayin' Nar is innocent, but it doesn't seem significant enough that any conclusion should be drawn from it. I wasn't around for Mafia 1 or 2, so don't know what was done in the past, but I never thought it would stir up all kinda accusations and didn't realize it would be construed as "protection without consultation", as Ice put it. My feet are wet now, LOL.

That said, I vote to lynch mostlycichlids. The whole "I know who Nar is" thing is curious.

WYite
Click to expand...

jpappy789 said:
Sorry, your post was there for reference. I was asking that question to Ice.



Interesting. Only 2 posts and one is a quick vote without any explanation. Judge knows better than that...a quick way to move onto my suspect list.



Ice may be "too good to jump", but he made it his vote so either way your reasoning makes no sense.
Click to expand...



jpappy789 said:
Interesting. 2/3 of the votes on WY are random and they are currently tied for the lead...very interesting.

I hope MC at least votes, I don't want mine to end up a UD vote, but there's not other place to move to right now so it'll stay.
Click to expand...

I am looking through some of wyom's post for hints. He had some dialoge with jpap he also tied his votes up with MC.

Something doesn't sit right with some of this and it almost appears staged.
 
IceH2O said:
Sucks MC UDed... Not having the healer is going to make the game tougher.

To the doubters. Bite me :lipssealedsmilie:






add my vote and you have 4 innocents. I'd like to say known but there is a lone evil out there and one of them could have voted Wyom. Also Wyom could have been the lone evil in which any of us 4 could be evil. I'm leaning all 4 of us innocent till I see differently though.




Now I must ask....

So JL do you think Wyom was protecting Nar or do you think he was trying to latch onto an innocent?

Jpap, do you get it now? Same question to you.

Rich,You said in post 45 my logic was as good as any. Then in post 61 you vote me with the reasoning that its not enough proof. You need more proof?

So who wasn't around much today? They didn't send in a hit so it has to be someone that either couldn't consult with the team or wasn't around.
Click to expand...

LOL...do you want me to say you were right and I was wrong? I'll acknowledge the fact that you voted for the right person but your reasoning was still barely better than the random votes that got him lynched as well. Lucky guess, as it is St. Patricks day after all...

I can't, in my mind, say WY protected Narwhal only because WY's post came out of no where as sort of a "randomish" post. But of all the stuff out there the connection is the strongest, although that is not saying much. So I do have to say I don't feel entirely comfortable with a Narwhal vote right now.

I still don't understand Jmax's vote. Sure, she voted WY but it seemed like a vote from a confused non-communicating leprechaun. I understand RL comes into play but why not least say it was random? It's just bothering me.
 
johnlarson66 said:
I am looking through some of wyom's post for hints. He had some dialoge with jpap he also tied his votes up with MC.

Something doesn't sit right with some of this and it almost appears staged.
Click to expand...

I'd hardly call that dialogue. He responded to a question of mine that was directed to Ice so I pointed it out to him. The last post was merely a fact, both sploke and Jm voted randomly and were lucky...how is that not interesting?
 
jpappy789 said:
I can't, in my mind, say WY protected Narwhal only because WY's post came out of no where as sort of a "randomish" post. But of all the stuff out there the connection is the strongest, although that is not saying much. So I do have to say I don't feel entirely comfortable with a Narwhal vote right now.
Click to expand...

My thought is that Wyom being a rookie doesn't know to NOT protect a team mate. When they saw something that stood out and was called on they reacted as most would and tried to squash it.

I'm keeping an open mind to others but I think Nar will end up getting my vote come night fall.

I agree with JL on the fact that something about you isn't sitting right.
 
My thinking thus far:

I am focusing on the "no hit" aspect first, since I think that could give away a lot.

Here is what I found to be the last post times of all members still in the game...I did my best to get them right, but if I made a mistake, please let me know.

 JPappy –8:42
Rich- 7:31
IceH2o- 8:58
Johnlarson- 9
Luckydud13- 8:02
Judgemax- 7:47
Sploke- 4:38
Dangerdoll- 7:40
cjtabares- 8:14
[ac] Narwhal- 8:11

I find it doubtful that JPap, Ice, or JL is the King given their posting times, and the fact they are all pros who wouldn't let something like that happen.

While I think it is totally possible for an evil to cast a vote on another evil, I think this is more commonly done when the votes are not so close. So, for now, I am going to cast those people who voted for Wyom as "non-suspects"...NOT innocent...just not at the top of my radar. So...Sploke, JM, Cj, Ice.

This leaves me with:
Rich- 7:31
Luckydud13- 8:02
Dangerdoll- 7:40
[ac] Narwhal- 8:11

The only other valuable evidence that I may consider is who voted for MC, and innocent....there is only 1 match, DD.

As of now, my top suspects are:
DD
Rich, Lucky, Nar
 
IceH2O said:
My thought is that Wyom being a rookie doesn't know to NOT protect a team mate. When they saw something that stood out and was called on they reacted as most would and tried to squash it.

I'm keeping an open mind to others but I think Nar will end up getting my vote come night fall.

I agree with JL on the fact that something about you isn't sitting right.
Click to expand...


I want to expand on this.

Since Wyom is a rookie he also wouldn't know to latch onto an innocent. More reason to me that I should....


I vote to lynch Narwhal

I am wary of JL and Jpap for the 3rd degree of why I was choosing Nar and why I had Wyom listed as evil.

DD I'm not really liking her floundering between MC and me.
 
I almost forgot about Rich...

He said the reason for my vote was as good as any better not that it was good.

Turned out to be the best reason.

Why of my "bad reason" did you choose me to vote for? Because it was weak? Can you tell me who had stronger reasoning and why you didn't vote them?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom