Mafia 50/50 The play..back to Basics..almost

Defense to what? The banter between me and Blue? Please explain what it is i am supposed to defend?
whatever you want to call the discussion between you and Blue, Noods....
I am sensing something from you atm too.... not sure if it's panic or what... or for the fact that you have only a little time to post since it is during lunch.... whatever the case, I stick with my vote until I see something more obvious.
 
I thought this was odd that right after I placed my vote on Blue, Luvbugz followed. Distancing maybe? Makes me uncomfortable........



Neither Blue or I have defended eachother, in fact, quite the opposite. Trying to divert the attention away from the connection of you and Blue?



Do you seriously believe that 3 communicating mafia would be so stupid to draw so much attention to eachother and vote on eachother? I could see a single vote for distancing or diversion but this is too much....:headshake2:

more distancing?



As stated before, I have not questioned your vote on TRS in fact I agree with it, just not enough to vote him out on the first nite; as I said I like to give noobs a chance on the first night. If you are inno Blue and get lynched than I have tied my own noose - if I make it thru the nite.

I went back and looked over the posts between us. You are right, neither of us are defending each other and it seems as though luvbugz did what he did intentionally. This is really odd to me because I placed my vote on TRS, this was after LB placed his vote onto TRS, but for different reasons. This makes LB look really scummy because he obviously is trying to divert attention from TRS because he had no reason to divert it from himself, he in turn put attention on himself then used Noods and me to try and divert the attention he put on himself. If luvbug was trying to distance himself from me, why is he defending TRS, it seems more appropriate that he is trying to get the attention shifted from TRS because of the idotic move he made when placing a lynch vote without backing up why he did. We all know that being the town idot doesn't help.

I think that I have my vote in the appropriate place, however if TRS is willing to explain himself and why he voted the way he did and why he randomly picked someone it may convince me to change my vote to someone else.
 
whatever you want to call the discussion between you and Blue, Noods....
I am sensing something from you atm too.... not sure if it's panic or what... or for the fact that you have only a little time to post since it is during lunch.... whatever the case, I stick with my vote until I see something more obvious.

Not sure what you are getting at here. For the record I made 4 posts during my lunch break and spent the rest of the time reading and thinking about it..........Not sure what you are sensing either, I am playing the way I always play........
 
I am tempted to retract my vote for Blue. I am not getting a good feeling about Luvbugz and with her vote following mine on Blue it makes me nervous......

Also, Dawg what's up? Not much input of any value this game; just floating along and agreeing that Kash is playing good.....Wierd......

I better get back to work before I get in trouble!! :lipssealedsmilie:
 
Yes, LG and I have played several games together. Why?

I just wanted to make sure you weren't the same person. :lipssealedsmilie:
 
It appears that Kash's list is not a summary of each player but some sort of timeline or list of random notes.

Whatever it is, seems odd that some players would merit multiple listings.
 
I just wanted to make sure you weren't the same person. :lipssealedsmilie:

And what are you implying?! Contrary to popular opinion/assumption, I am not a blonde! :silly:
 
I am getting no good or even slight feelings at all here.

Some people are more active than others but the people talking a lot are the people who always talk a lot.

I can see the arguments for Bugz but just not sure.

I still am clueless why TRS voted for me. I hope he lets me know at some point.

For the moment, I vote to lynch Dawg.

Lets see what that gets me.
 
I am going to take this as a compliment but this is only my 4th game,...

You're more than welcome to take that however you wish, cjt. Referring to you as a "veteran player" was not being complimentary..... neither was it intended to be unflattering..... as haven't the slightest idea how many mafia games anyone has played before.

Certain players made reference to having prior experience in previous games while others identified themselves as newbies. That's where those distinctions came from on the list I made to keep track of everything.

...and i stated that i thought you were grasping at straws, as you put it, this dose not make you a bad player i think you are trying to get the attention on others.

Sure I was. That's exactly what I was doing when this got started. I even told everyone what I was doing and why I was doing it...

Nope, DD.. first time here. (I just tend to post a lot.. lmao.)

There's really not a lot to go on, so I'm fishing around. Hoping I'll get lucky and figure something out.

I asked for opinions because I'm new to this. Simple as that. I wouldn't venture an opinion with no experience or anything else to base it on. BUT.... it occurred to me the responses we get might flush out clues who the bad guys are. All we really know is that they're connected.

I wasn't all that interested in JL's statement at first. Mostly just curious. It seemed random enough that he would raise questions about this mysterious "alias" player named wing nut... suggesting this was "odd."

Your reaction, however, is very interesting. You completely ignored the fact that JL pointed our suspicion in your direction. Instead, you came after me. Why would you do that? Or rather, why would you do that if you're not trying to protect him?

If you remember at that point on the first day, none of us had anything to go on but a lot of hot air. Very few of us were posting at all (12 pages ago) and what did appear in the thread at the time was lighthearted and playful.

Now then... as everyone else who's cast their vote for lynching has been asked to explain why, I'll ask the same of you.


But my vote will stand unless i see something someone else doses that really seems evil, because of my reasons stated before and something just dose not seem right about Kashta to me.

At the time, you didn't actually give reasons...

Ok well i have a lot to do today, leaving for Jamaica. on Wed, am not sure how much time i will have to get back on here.

So

I vote to lynch Kashta

I dont think we have a lot to go on being Day 1 it is not anything new but Kashta has risen the most flags to me to this point. Kind of just a gut feeling but there are a few small things.

They seem to be playing very well for a newbie maybe to well, getting help from others maybe.

They also seem to be making some weak arguments, something i have used as mafia to try to get attention looking at others.

well I thought nightfall was today

That's it? That's all it took for you to vote to hang someone?

You forgot the fact that "nightfall" doesn't happen until Monday and needed to pick out someone in a hurry. The reasons you cited were gut feelings, vague statements that something doesn't seem right about me... over what, the fact that I jumped in right away hoping to get my feet wet? That I threw out some arbitrary ideas that were weak suggestions so I could find out what everyone else thought? Is it even possible for someone to be LESS specific than you've been?
 
AquariaCentral.com