A few thoughts. (JL's going to hate this because I haven't quoted everything as I'm in a rush going through a lot of posts to catch up from my weekend dalliance).
It's a little early to say anything definate but let me try and catch up my thoughts:
1) RBishop- day one switching to make the first "favourite" talking about making a "train" - then later despite it being a "not much to go on vote" makes the comment "2 people not much of a train".
2) Ogre - I'm not going to make the mistake again to ever say on day two that Ogre looks innocent... LOL (see Maf 53.5)... but right now- I really don't see what the fuss is about against him. Could he be guilty- maybe- but there seems to be a strong effort to get him removed.
3) Zaffy - Not said much (neither have I)- but I think what Zaffy has said has been helpfull and insightfull so far. I don't think you can read anything from his quietness.
4) JohnL - seems to be trying very hard to push for Ogre to be removed. To me the whole Ogre vs JohnL thing looks suspicious. They both go back a ways in this sport- and I think have a mutual respect for each other's abilities. JohnL seems to be trying to build a case against Ogre out of nothing- as mentioned by others above- Ogre is one of those that are easy to build a case against regardless of guilt.
5) Why was Dawg removed- I don't see it as really a bad move on their part- he's a respected player. When you have to worry is when newer players are targeted- because then you can be fairly sure that most of the better veterans are likely all mafia or they would have been voted off.
6) Lady G - If Bishop is guilty (and he is on my suspect list) - Lady G would be next... because of her earlier reluctance to vote Bishop despite thinking him suspicious. I don't really have anything against her individually- but it's worth noting if Bishop is guilty to look at her.
7) Annie - I can't read Annie. He's a bit of a wild-card in every game. I'm not sure if it is deliberate but he's always bouncing around all over the place being unpredicatable. Makes it hard to pin anything on him- but he can look guilty even when innocent- bit of a teflon player though- hard to make anything stick to him.
I don't think his pre-night one shenanigans really say anything. I'm certainly not saying I'm leaning him innocent- I'd always treat him as a suspect because he is always an unknown.
I'm saying he's an unknown and I think people are reading too much into his late day one actions.
It's a little early to say anything definate but let me try and catch up my thoughts:
1) RBishop- day one switching to make the first "favourite" talking about making a "train" - then later despite it being a "not much to go on vote" makes the comment "2 people not much of a train".
2) Ogre - I'm not going to make the mistake again to ever say on day two that Ogre looks innocent... LOL (see Maf 53.5)... but right now- I really don't see what the fuss is about against him. Could he be guilty- maybe- but there seems to be a strong effort to get him removed.
3) Zaffy - Not said much (neither have I)- but I think what Zaffy has said has been helpfull and insightfull so far. I don't think you can read anything from his quietness.
4) JohnL - seems to be trying very hard to push for Ogre to be removed. To me the whole Ogre vs JohnL thing looks suspicious. They both go back a ways in this sport- and I think have a mutual respect for each other's abilities. JohnL seems to be trying to build a case against Ogre out of nothing- as mentioned by others above- Ogre is one of those that are easy to build a case against regardless of guilt.
5) Why was Dawg removed- I don't see it as really a bad move on their part- he's a respected player. When you have to worry is when newer players are targeted- because then you can be fairly sure that most of the better veterans are likely all mafia or they would have been voted off.
6) Lady G - If Bishop is guilty (and he is on my suspect list) - Lady G would be next... because of her earlier reluctance to vote Bishop despite thinking him suspicious. I don't really have anything against her individually- but it's worth noting if Bishop is guilty to look at her.
7) Annie - I can't read Annie. He's a bit of a wild-card in every game. I'm not sure if it is deliberate but he's always bouncing around all over the place being unpredicatable. Makes it hard to pin anything on him- but he can look guilty even when innocent- bit of a teflon player though- hard to make anything stick to him.
I don't think his pre-night one shenanigans really say anything. I'm certainly not saying I'm leaning him innocent- I'd always treat him as a suspect because he is always an unknown.
I'm saying he's an unknown and I think people are reading too much into his late day one actions.
: