Mafia 58-

We have an odd number of players, so this won't end up in a tie.. unless someone else draws votes. Should be interesting.

Day 4 Vote Tally (So Far)

3 Zaffy - Kashta Zsand DD
4 Ogre - Annie Jpappy Noods Zaffy

No vote: TRS and Ogre

Ogre has Zaffy as an innocent, so I would be surprised if he threw his vote there.
 
We all seem to be in consensus that Ogre and Zaffy are at the top of the list, but that leaves one more scum player.....The town does not win until all mafia are eliminated. This is going to be interesting.....we need to be extra careful and not get fooled by the mafia and start voting eachother out. As my mom used to say "There's a fungus among us".
 
Also, I do not think it would help if the town journalist came out and stated who they investigated. there is no way to validate what they are saying as truth and it would be the perfect set up for the mafia journalist to mess us up. I say we are doing pretty darn good at this point, so why make a mess of things?
 
wow! Has anyone looked at the post count lately? All I can say is, "Pap, do your homework!" ;)
 
Also, I do not think it would help if the town journalist came out and stated who they investigated. there is no way to validate what they are saying as truth and it would be the perfect set up for the mafia journalist to mess us up. I say we are doing pretty darn good at this point, so why make a mess of things?

My question wasn't about them coming out or posting invest results. Ice won't allow that. I was just talking about that info in the headlines.
 
4 Zaffy - Kashta Zsand DD TRS
4 Ogre - Annie Jpappy Noods Zaffy

No vote: Ogre

So it's a tie. Ogre may not like Zaffy as a vote but he's not going to vote himself. So it might stay a tie if Ogre names someone else.
 
That was my thinking too, Zaffy. While the mafia team could still kill a known innocent with their hit, it would put them at risk (as I was for tomorrow). All three of them are gone now, so it should be safe enough now to reveal innocent invest results.

Certainly tonight it's safe to make a headline saying who's who.

Also, maybe the journalist can give hints as to who is innocent. I don't think that would violate Ice's rule.

Or, if the innocent communicating team thought they knew who the journalist was they could give signals so tonight investigation isn't wasted on another communicator.
 
The good thing is the group tally seems to be working really well and I think it is something we should revisit later in this Day as it pointed soundly to MC.

This is a fabulous idea, the thing I like most about it is that it works off of a statistical principle where if you survey a random sample of people about a particular subject, their average answer will be pretty darn close to the actual answer.

[FONT=&quot]

[/FONT]
 
Certainly tonight it's safe to make a headline saying who's who.

Also, maybe the journalist can give hints as to who is innocent. I don't think that would violate Ice's rule.

Or, if the innocent communicating team thought they knew who the journalist was they could give signals so tonight investigation isn't wasted on another communicator.

I'd venture to say we each have a pretty good idea who's who. It'll be nice though to have some of these confirmed.
 
AquariaCentral.com