Mafia 58-

Yeah, but I don't expect them to be protecting someone the town thinks is 98% innocent ;)

I know, I was just mentioning that for the record. Hopefully this nightfall will give us more leads.....Let's pray the hit is an accurate one.
 
One thing that I have been thinking about is that the non-communicating mafia wouldn't want to risk implicating their teammate in the headlines. Does anyone else think that then it would be best for them to avoid naming specific players, like the first one, in case people catch on and it ends up that they caused another mafia player to be lynched?

You're trying to be helpful, Pappy, and I'm trying to give you the benefit of doubt. But... if you are mafia, this sounds a lot like you're coaching the non-communicating mafia journalist along... providing this helpful bit of advice and all. The fact that I was called out by name (in relation to scum-Dawg's death the same nightfall) is what gave credibility to the opposing headline's content (regarding Rich).

How am I supposed to read a speculative paragraph like this with the idea in mind that you're pro-town? And if you're working for the town side, why post something like this at all?
 
Zaffy, let's get you on record. In this post, you proposed a deliberate run-off vote between me and Rich.. because of the headlines. That appears to be your only rationale for voting me at this point.

I vote to lynch Kashta

We know one of them is scum, so I'd hate to have full train on just one, lets set the scum up so that they have to make a move.

I think this makes the votes 3-1 in richs favor?

Then in this post, you go on to provide a fall-back reason you can use as an excuse later on if I get lynched and turn up innocent.

That very well may be, and if nothing happens then I'll switch. Till then, it's research.

Frankly, I'd like to pin you down a little more than this, so... Are you voting me because I'm your top suspect?
 
I wish I had put it in the rules but I didn't.

I'm saying it now though. The journalists can't come out. It would defeat the reason both headlines are posted at once.
..,

that makes the whole thing a moot point I suppose.

I retract my vote to lynch kashta and vote to lynch rich311k.

I think he's way more scummier than Kash. I only put my vote on kash to make it a close race in hopes that there would be a move to save him. It appears at this point that is not the case. So he's probably run of the mill regular scum, not the communicating kind. Unless we're all wrong, but I'm comfortable with that.
 
...


Frankly, I'd like to pin you down a little more than this, so... Are you voting me because I'm your top suspect?

Not at all, see my previous post. I think you're an innocent.
 
You're trying to be helpful, Pappy, and I'm trying to give you the benefit of doubt. But... if you are mafia, this sounds a lot like you're coaching the non-communicating mafia journalist along... providing this helpful bit of advice and all. The fact that I was called out by name (in relation to scum-Dawg's death the same nightfall) is what gave credibility to the opposing headline's content (regarding Rich).

How am I supposed to read a speculative paragraph like this with the idea in mind that you're pro-town? And if you're working for the town side, why post something like this at all?

Because then it nails the first headline as being mafia, which makes Rich scum and you likely innocent. If I think it already happened (it didn't say "Kash is king" which would be much more direct) how can you consider it coaching at all?
 
I completely agree with this

I third this, seems the best strategy to me.

that makes the whole thing a moot point I suppose.

I retract my vote to lynch kashta and vote to lynch rich311k.

I think he's way more scummier than Kash. I only put my vote on kash to make it a close race in hopes that there would be a move to save him. It appears at this point that is not the case. So he's probably run of the mill regular scum, not the communicating kind. Unless we're all wrong, but I'm comfortable with that.

Not at all, see my previous post. I think you're an innocent.

Zaffy, if you think she is Innocent then why vote her to keep it from becoming a train? If you think her Innocent then Rich is Mafia and it makes since to vote him right away.

As I said earlier, this is not the scenario where you run two candidates. In that scenario you run two as you suspect both but want to see vote shifts to see who saves whom (who/whom?) In this case one person IS Mafia and one is Most Likely Innocent.

It makes sense to run the votes on the one most likely to be MAfia so the Mafia can't shift a few votes and lynch the Innocent of the two assuming they know which is which. They are down two but the numbers are still rather close.

That's why I am keeping you high on my suspect list Zaffy. Glad to see you've joined the movement for now though, that leaves just MC and Ogre.
 
Wow you guys are convincing I may vote for myself. I still don't see how you all find this as overwhelming. Considering how many mafia there are out there you think you would at least pause and try to find a good candidate. as we know though following the ,masses makes it much easier to stay alive in this game. I still say you come to the conclusion that Kash is innocent because she talked more than me. Surely you could find something more than that,
 
AquariaCentral.com