Mafia 58-

This is a fabulous idea, the thing I like most about it is that it works off of a statistical principle where if you survey a random sample of people about a particular subject, their average answer will be pretty darn close to the actual answer.

Do you also speak Klingon???
 
Do you also speak Klingon???

You might want to work on being more subtle with your sarcasm if you are striving to reach Kashta's level....:p:
 
Do you also speak Klingon???

You might want to work on being more subtle with your sarcasm if you are striving to reach Kashta's level....:p:

:rofl:

Still.. don't pick on Zaff too much because he's analytical. I like that about his posts... Of course, being like that probably messes up his game as much as me being that way messes up mine. But hey, it could be worse. He could be long-winded too!!

:p:
 
:rofl:

Still.. don't pick on Zaff too much because he's analytical. I like that about his posts... Of course, being like that probably messes up his game as much as me being that way messes up mine. But hey, it could be worse. He could be long-winded too!!

:p:

:lol:
 
Okay, so here's Plan B....

Since they're all scummy anyway, we might as well lynch TRS and Ogre first (for not posting much). Then we can keep Zaffy around for a bit longer for intellectual debates and Annie for comic relief.

Whatd'ya think???

:rofl:
 
I like that idea!
 
Regarding the journalist revealing the investigation results...maybe only if the current top suspects (Zaffy, Ogre, etc.) are in fact innocent? I know it would be helpful to have known innocents, but I think it would end up creating more confusion when both come out and start naming names. Plus, not sure if it's still against the rules.

I guess it is something we can mull over today. Those were just the first thoughts that popped into my head. It's early too...

For that comment in red.

I was thinking about that possibility too, Pappy. But I think, if the townie journalist had investigated either Zaffy or Ogre already and the results came back innocent... I believe we would have seen somebody post something in their defense. Or at least urging us in some subtle way to maybe vote a different suspect sooner than them (giving the journalist time to share that piece of information in their next headline).

Since we haven't seen anything like that.. (1) one or the other may be their latest invest and the result we'll read in tomorrow's headline is evil not innocent... or (2) neither of them got investigated yet.
 
AquariaCentral.com